Difference between revisions of "Legal Project Lead produces second draft"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Back to Worldwide Overview >> Step VI. Public discussion <b>Suggested Timeframe:</b> two weeks =Revision and explanation= Once the Project Leads agree that enough time in the pu...)
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Back to [[Worldwide Overview]] >> Step VI. [[Public discussion]]
+
Back to [[International Overview]] >> Step VI. [[Public discussion]]
  
 
<b>Suggested Timeframe:</b> two weeks
 
<b>Suggested Timeframe:</b> two weeks
Line 5: Line 5:
 
=Revision and explanation=
 
=Revision and explanation=
  
Once the Project Leads agree that enough time in the public discussion has elapsed, then they can begin to work on a second draft. This draft should be a revision based on comments gained in the public discussion.  
+
Once the Project Leads agree that enough time in the public discussion has elapsed, then they can begin to work on a next draft. This draft should be a revision based on comments gained in the public discussion.  
  
When the second draft is finalized, we kindly ask for another English re-translation of the draft, and please point out and explain the changes that have been made.  
+
When this next draft is finalized, we kindly ask for another English re-translation of the draft (if necessary), and that the Legal Lead please point out and explain the changes that have been made.  
  
If any interesting and relevant material has surfaced during the public discussion that you would like to share, we encourage you to forward the information to us so that we can inform the CC community. Examples of relevant material include:
+
If any interesting and relevant material has surfaced during the public discussion that you would like to share, please complete a [[media:Public Discussion Report Template.ods|public discussion report]]. Examples of relevant material include:
  
 
* a brief history of copyright law and intellectual property rights in your jurisdiction
 
* a brief history of copyright law and intellectual property rights in your jurisdiction
 
* outline and links to major legislation and international treaties that affect copyright and IP rights in your jurisdiction
 
* outline and links to major legislation and international treaties that affect copyright and IP rights in your jurisdiction
 
* how Creative Commons fits into the current legislation
 
* how Creative Commons fits into the current legislation
* changes that were made to the licenses to accommodate local legislation and policy
+
* changes that were made to the licenses to accommodate relevant law and policy
  
 
----
 
----
  
 
Next: Step VIII. [[CCi reviews second draft]]
 
Next: Step VIII. [[CCi reviews second draft]]

Latest revision as of 21:47, 28 September 2011

Back to International Overview >> Step VI. Public discussion

Suggested Timeframe: two weeks

Revision and explanation

Once the Project Leads agree that enough time in the public discussion has elapsed, then they can begin to work on a next draft. This draft should be a revision based on comments gained in the public discussion.

When this next draft is finalized, we kindly ask for another English re-translation of the draft (if necessary), and that the Legal Lead please point out and explain the changes that have been made.

If any interesting and relevant material has surfaced during the public discussion that you would like to share, please complete a public discussion report. Examples of relevant material include:

  • a brief history of copyright law and intellectual property rights in your jurisdiction
  • outline and links to major legislation and international treaties that affect copyright and IP rights in your jurisdiction
  • how Creative Commons fits into the current legislation
  • changes that were made to the licenses to accommodate relevant law and policy

Next: Step VIII. CCi reviews second draft