Difference between revisions of "Talk:4.0/ShareAlike"

Revision as of 01:01, 11 December 2011

Why not?

e.g. CC-BY-SA is conceptually very different from CC-BY-NC-SA.

CC-BY-SA is pro-freedom for society.

CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers.

Of all the licenses CC has ever produced, the Share-Alike license (1.0) is closest to (a suggested) Libre Puro License.

Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this discussion (on ShareAlike 4.0).

Is there room to consider formalisation of something as pro-freedom as this?

See:

the preamble:

and the license deed:

Thanks :-) - Kt 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Libre Puro==
+==Does it make sense to discuss "ShareAlike" generically?==
-The Share-Alike license is closest to Libre Puro of all the licenses CC has ever produced.
+Why not?
+::e.g. CC-BY-SA is conceptually very different from CC-BY-NC-SA.
+::CC-BY-SA is pro-freedom for society.
+::CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers.
+==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0])?==
+Of all the licenses CC has ever produced, the Share-Alike license ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0]) is closest to (a suggested) Libre Puro License.
 Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this discussion (on ShareAlike 4.0).
 Is there room to consider formalisation of something as pro-freedom as this?
+See:
 http://wikieducator.org/Libre_Puro_License
-Please also read the preamble:
+the preamble:
 http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License#Preamble_for_the_Libre_Puro_License
-and check out the license deed:
+and the license deed:
 http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License_Draft_Creative_Commons_Deed
 Thanks :-) - [[User:Kt|Kt]] 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)