Difference between revisions of "Talk:Defining Noncommercial"

This is one place to leave feedback on the study.

Blogged reactions

For now, using this talk section to track blogged reactions. Please add to the list. --Mike Linksvayer 17:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

• David Wiley, http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1072
• Christopher Allen, http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2009/09/creative-commons-posts-defining-noncommercial-report.html
• Thomas Gideon, http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/14/more-debate-on-defining-broadband-a-zombie-broadcast-flag-google-launches-a-project-to-liberate-your-data-and-more/ (this looks like and is a link dump, but includes a solid paragraph on the report which would stand as a post on its own)
• Jeremy Phillips, http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-does-noncommercial-mean-some.html
• Philipp Lenssen, http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2009-09-15-n56.html
• Cory Doctorow, http://www.boingboing.net/2009/09/14/results-of-creative.html
• Harvey Anderson, http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/creative-commons-research-findings-on-non-commercial/
• Hay Kranen, http://www.haykranen.nl/2009/09/15/the-creative-commons-non-commercial-report/
• Leonhard Dobusch, http://governancexborders.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/standardizing-via-polling-creative-commons%E2%80%99-study-on-its-noncommercial-clause/
• Jonathan Bailey, http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/09/16/creative-commons-debuts-study-on-noncommercial-use/
• Stephen Downes, http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50061
• Glyn Moody, http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/09/nonplussed-by-non-commercial.html