Difference between revisions of "License metadata validation web application"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|tags=metadata | |tags=metadata | ||
|is_complete=yes | |is_complete=yes | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Infobox| | ||
| + | '''NOTE''' This challenge completed successfully but has since fallen out of date. If you're interested in working in this area there is now a challenge to [[Rewrite_Metadata_Validator|rewrite the validator]]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:49, 26 March 2008
| Related To: | ,|x|Related To::x}} |
|---|---|
| Tags: | {{#arraymap:metadata|,|x|Has Tag::x}} | (none) }} |
| Challenge Type: | Has Challenge Type::Developer | (none) }} |
| Is Complete: | Is Complete::yes | Is Complete::no }} |
NOTE This challenge completed successfully but has since fallen out of date. If you're interested in working in this area there is now a challenge to rewrite the validator.
This application should work much like the W3C RDF Validation Service. It may even re-use some of the same code. Instead of parsing RDF from a text input box or URL and displaying represented triples, the license metadata version should extract RDF potentially embedded in HTML from a text input box or URL, parse the RDF, and display license and work properties instead of raw RDF triples.
Implementations
- Nathan Yergler's excellent ccValidator meets the challenge! Please send Nathan bug reports, feature requests, and patches. If you have a different (better, thinks you) implementation in mind, don't be dissuaded by existing code -- the W3C RDF validator has used at least two different implementations.
