Difference between revisions of "Case Studies/Brad Sucks"
U.S. Curator (talk | contribs) (add category) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Read our full [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/9750 Featured Commoner Interview] with Brad Sucks to learn more. | Read our full [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/9750 Featured Commoner Interview] with Brad Sucks to learn more. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:USA]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:55, 8 September 2011
Well, I resisted officially CC licensing my stuff for a long time, I thought it was unnecessary and a bunch of legal stuff I didn’t think anyone wanted to care about. But now I think the CC license is simply a shortcut to telling people “hey, go ahead”. While I had clearly said on my website “do whatever you like”, people would constantly ask me for permission anyway, which was strange to me. I think CC licenses, the entire open attitude is absolutely essential for artists that don’t have huge promotion budgets. Without the money to force advertising and radio play down people’s throats, you have to rely on the good will of your fans spreading your music for you. And if you handcuff them by making it illegal, I think you’re doing yourself a real disservice. — Brad Sucks
Read our full Featured Commoner Interview with Brad Sucks to learn more.
