Difference between revisions of "Talk:Podcasting Legal Guide"
(Legal Basis - US Government Work?) |
(→Guide Corrections) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
But you have to [[CcWiki:About#Register|register and confirm]] first. | But you have to [[CcWiki:About#Register|register and confirm]] first. | ||
| + | My question is this: If there is a copyrighted recording of a performer performing his or her song BUT I am not using the recorded version, but instead am having the performer perform live, do I need to get the mechanical rights from Harry Fox? NOTE: this performer has made a recording before; however, the copyrighted recording is not being used. | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
Can you provide the legal basis for "[http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Podcasting_Legal_Guide#You_Are_Using_A_US_Government_Work. You Are Using A US Government Work]", I am interested in promoting a similar approach in the Canadian government and would like more information about the US Context. Please drop me a note at cormier (dot) patrick (at) gmail (dot) com - Thanks! | Can you provide the legal basis for "[http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Podcasting_Legal_Guide#You_Are_Using_A_US_Government_Work. You Are Using A US Government Work]", I am interested in promoting a similar approach in the Canadian government and would like more information about the US Context. Please drop me a note at cormier (dot) patrick (at) gmail (dot) com - Thanks! | ||
| − | + | [[User:Patrick Cormier|Patrick Cormier]] 19:04, 23 May 2006 | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[User:Patrick Cormier|Patrick Cormier]] | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 15: | ||
Two things that would be good would be: (1) an expansion of section 1.2.3 with respect to the TEACH Act, and (2) any information on how the restriction of a podcast (by requiring authentication, etc.) might motify the provisions of some of the different laws discussed. In regard to the TEACH Act, it seems to me that podcasting could be violating the provisions regarding using technological provisions to prevent students from retaining copyrighted materials past the end of the class or redistributing them. | Two things that would be good would be: (1) an expansion of section 1.2.3 with respect to the TEACH Act, and (2) any information on how the restriction of a podcast (by requiring authentication, etc.) might motify the provisions of some of the different laws discussed. In regard to the TEACH Act, it seems to me that podcasting could be violating the provisions regarding using technological provisions to prevent students from retaining copyrighted materials past the end of the class or redistributing them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Guide Corrections === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Errors have been noticed in the Guide. Someone with sufficient editing rights should make the following corrections: | ||
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | <li>Under the [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Finding_CC-Licensed_Materials.|Finding CC-Licensed Materials]] section, the link is malformed. <strong>.&rdquo</strong> should be removed. --[[User:Patrick Cormier|Patrick Cormier]] 19:04, 23 May 2006 </li> | ||
| + | <li>Under the [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#What_Other_Issues_Should_I_Be_Thinking_About.3F|What Other Issues Should I Be Thinking About]] section, <strong>(aka “Section 230)</strong> is missing a closing quote. --[[User:Jkimrey|Jkimrey]] 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Under the [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Interviewing_Someone_Or_Asking_Someone_To_Join_You_In_Conversation_As_Part_Of_Your_Podcast|Interviewing Someone Or Asking Someone To Join You In Conversation As Part Of Your Podcast]] section, 3rd paragraph, <strong>but it safest to get your interviewee's written consent</strong> should be changed to <strong>but it <em>is</em> safest to get your interviewee's written consent</strong>. (<strong>is</strong> needs to be added). --[[User:Jkimrey|Jkimrey]] 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Under the [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Using_Music|Using Music]] section, 1st paragraph, <strong>does no fall within one of the 5 types</strong> should be changed to <strong>does <em>not</em> fall within one of the 5 types</strong>. (<strong>not</strong> is missing a <strong>t</strong>). --[[User:Jkimrey|Jkimrey]] 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Under the [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Two_Types_Of_Copyright_.E2.80.9CRights.E2.80.9D.|Two Types of Copy "Rights"]] section, 4th paragraph, <strong>(udner theories of ”contributory” or ”vicarious” infringement)</strong> should be changed to <strong>(under theories of ”contributory” or ”vicarious” infringement)</strong>. (<strong>under</strong> is misspelled). --[[User:Jkimrey|Jkimrey]] 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Under the [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Two_Types_Of_Copyright_.E2.80.9CRights.E2.80.9D.|Two Types of Copy "Rights"]] section, 7th paragraph, <strong>athttp://</strong> should be changed to <strong>at http://</strong>. (a space needs to be added). --[[User:Jkimrey|Jkimrey]] 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)</li> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ul> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:01, 14 March 2007
Anyone may comment here
But you have to register and confirm first. My question is this: If there is a copyrighted recording of a performer performing his or her song BUT I am not using the recorded version, but instead am having the performer perform live, do I need to get the mechanical rights from Harry Fox? NOTE: this performer has made a recording before; however, the copyrighted recording is not being used.
Legal Basis - US Government Work?
Can you provide the legal basis for "You Are Using A US Government Work", I am interested in promoting a similar approach in the Canadian government and would like more information about the US Context. Please drop me a note at cormier (dot) patrick (at) gmail (dot) com - Thanks!
Patrick Cormier 19:04, 23 May 2006
For somebody with sufficient rights to fix the Guide: section "Finding CC licensed content" has malformed URL for cc license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/.&rdquo
Two things that would be good would be: (1) an expansion of section 1.2.3 with respect to the TEACH Act, and (2) any information on how the restriction of a podcast (by requiring authentication, etc.) might motify the provisions of some of the different laws discussed. In regard to the TEACH Act, it seems to me that podcasting could be violating the provisions regarding using technological provisions to prevent students from retaining copyrighted materials past the end of the class or redistributing them.
Guide Corrections
Errors have been noticed in the Guide. Someone with sufficient editing rights should make the following corrections:
- Under the Finding CC-Licensed Materials section, the link is malformed. .&rdquo should be removed. --Patrick Cormier 19:04, 23 May 2006
- Under the What Other Issues Should I Be Thinking About section, (aka “Section 230) is missing a closing quote. --Jkimrey 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Under the Interviewing Someone Or Asking Someone To Join You In Conversation As Part Of Your Podcast section, 3rd paragraph, but it safest to get your interviewee's written consent should be changed to but it is safest to get your interviewee's written consent. (is needs to be added). --Jkimrey 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Under the Using Music section, 1st paragraph, does no fall within one of the 5 types should be changed to does not fall within one of the 5 types. (not is missing a t). --Jkimrey 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Under the Two Types of Copy "Rights" section, 4th paragraph, (udner theories of ”contributory” or ”vicarious” infringement) should be changed to (under theories of ”contributory” or ”vicarious” infringement). (under is misspelled). --Jkimrey 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Under the Two Types of Copy "Rights" section, 7th paragraph, athttp:// should be changed to at http://. (a space needs to be added). --Jkimrey 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
