Difference between revisions of "Case Studies/Brad Sucks"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(add category)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Case Study
 
{{Case Study
 
|Description=Brad Sucks, a CC license using pop/rock musician, is one of the most remixed artists over at ccMixter - he runs an active blog, interacts with fans directly, and released his latest album Out Of It for free online and under a CC BY-SA license.
 
|Description=Brad Sucks, a CC license using pop/rock musician, is one of the most remixed artists over at ccMixter - he runs an active blog, interacts with fans directly, and released his latest album Out Of It for free online and under a CC BY-SA license.
 +
|Mainurl=http://www.bradsucks.net/
 +
|Author=Brad Sucks
 +
|User_Status=Creator
 +
|Tag=music
 +
|Format=Sound
 +
|Country=United States
 
|Quote=Well, I resisted officially CC licensing my stuff for a long time, I thought it was unnecessary and a bunch of legal stuff I didn’t think anyone wanted to care about. But now I think the CC license is simply a shortcut to telling people “hey, go ahead”. While I had clearly said on my website “do whatever you like”, people would constantly ask me for permission anyway, which was strange to me. I think CC licenses, the entire open attitude is absolutely essential for artists that don’t have huge promotion budgets. Without the money to force advertising and radio play down people’s throats, you have to rely on the good will of your fans spreading your music for you. And if you handcuff them by making it illegal, I think you’re doing yourself a real disservice.
 
|Quote=Well, I resisted officially CC licensing my stuff for a long time, I thought it was unnecessary and a bunch of legal stuff I didn’t think anyone wanted to care about. But now I think the CC license is simply a shortcut to telling people “hey, go ahead”. While I had clearly said on my website “do whatever you like”, people would constantly ask me for permission anyway, which was strange to me. I think CC licenses, the entire open attitude is absolutely essential for artists that don’t have huge promotion budgets. Without the money to force advertising and radio play down people’s throats, you have to rely on the good will of your fans spreading your music for you. And if you handcuff them by making it illegal, I think you’re doing yourself a real disservice.
 
|Quote_Attribution=Brad Sucks
 
|Quote_Attribution=Brad Sucks
Line 6: Line 12:
 
|Image_attribution=CC BY
 
|Image_attribution=CC BY
 
|Image_license=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
 
|Image_license=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
|Mainurl=http://www.bradsucks.net/
+
|importance=Low
|Author=Brad Sucks
+
|quality=Start
|User_Status=Creator
+
|License_short_name=CC BY-SA
|Tag=music
 
|License short name=CC BY-SA
 
 
|License=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
 
|License=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
|Format=Sound
 
|Country=USA
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
Read our full [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/9750 Featured Commoner Interview] with Brad Sucks to learn more.
 
Read our full [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/9750 Featured Commoner Interview] with Brad Sucks to learn more.
 +
 +
[[Category:USA]]

Latest revision as of 20:55, 8 September 2011


Media
Sound
Adoption date unspecified
Tags
music
Translations

.


Evaluation Information.png
Page Importance: Start
Page Quality: Low
Brad Sucks, a CC license using pop/rock musician, is one of the most remixed artists over at ccMixter - he runs an active blog, interacts with fans directly, and released his latest album Out Of It for free online and under a CC BY-SA license.

Well, I resisted officially CC licensing my stuff for a long time, I thought it was unnecessary and a bunch of legal stuff I didn’t think anyone wanted to care about. But now I think the CC license is simply a shortcut to telling people “hey, go ahead”. While I had clearly said on my website “do whatever you like”, people would constantly ask me for permission anyway, which was strange to me. I think CC licenses, the entire open attitude is absolutely essential for artists that don’t have huge promotion budgets. Without the money to force advertising and radio play down people’s throats, you have to rely on the good will of your fans spreading your music for you. And if you handcuff them by making it illegal, I think you’re doing yourself a real disservice. — Brad Sucks

Read our full Featured Commoner Interview with Brad Sucks to learn more.