Difference between revisions of "NonCommercial"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [http://www.appropedia.org/Non-commercial_licenses_vs_free_licenses Non-commercial licenses vs free licenses] (on Appropedia - the problems of NC licenses in the context of sharing knowledge sustainability and international development.) | * [http://www.appropedia.org/Non-commercial_licenses_vs_free_licenses Non-commercial licenses vs free licenses] (on Appropedia - the problems of NC licenses in the context of sharing knowledge sustainability and international development.) | ||
Blog posts by Rob Myers: | Blog posts by Rob Myers: | ||
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2004/08 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2004/08/the-noncommercial-fallacy.html The NonCommercial Fallacy], August 17, 2004, Fallacy: ''"NC stops anyone who uses the work from making money off of it."'' |
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2005/10 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2005/10/the-noncommercial-fallacy-revisited.html The NonCommercial Fallacy Revisited], October 16, 2005. "How to make money off of CC-NC music..." |
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2005/10 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2005/10/the-noncommercial-fallacy-three.html The NonCommercial Fallacy Three], October 23, 2005. Fallacy: ''"I don't mind other people using my work but if they make money off it I want my cut."'' |
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2006/11 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2006/11/why-the-nc-permission-culture-simply-doesnt-work.html Why The NC Permission Culture Simply Doesn't Work], November 8, 2006. |
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/02 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/02/noncommercial-sharealike-is-not-copyleft.html NonCommercial Sharealike Is Not Copyleft], February 24, 2008. |
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/03 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/03/persuasion-1.html Persuasion 1], March 14, 2008. (Long post, referencing Richard Stallman's arguments for [[free software]].) |
| − | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/07 | + | * [http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/07/the-emerging-nc-consensus.html The Emerging NC Consensus], July 23, 2008. |
[[Category:NonCommercial]] | [[Category:NonCommercial]] | ||
Revision as of 16:50, 4 February 2010
Noncommercial or NC is one of the terms available in the Creative Commons license suite, present in the BY-NC, BY-NC-SA, and BY-NC-ND licenses.
The Defining Noncommercial study published in 2009 looks at how the online population understands "commercial" and "noncommercial" and contains some rules of thumb for licensors and licensees using or thinking about using licenses with the NC term.
Links: Arguments for and against
- The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License - on the Freedom Defined wiki.
- Does the Noncommercial Creative Commons license make sense? (CNet blog post, November 27, 2007). "Especially in today's world of interlocking personal and professional lives, defining where "noncommercial use" begins and ends can get extraordinarily tricky."
- Non-commercial licenses vs free licenses (on Appropedia - the problems of NC licenses in the context of sharing knowledge sustainability and international development.)
Blog posts by Rob Myers:
- The NonCommercial Fallacy, August 17, 2004, Fallacy: "NC stops anyone who uses the work from making money off of it."
- The NonCommercial Fallacy Revisited, October 16, 2005. "How to make money off of CC-NC music..."
- The NonCommercial Fallacy Three, October 23, 2005. Fallacy: "I don't mind other people using my work but if they make money off it I want my cut."
- Why The NC Permission Culture Simply Doesn't Work, November 8, 2006.
- NonCommercial Sharealike Is Not Copyleft, February 24, 2008.
- Persuasion 1, March 14, 2008. (Long post, referencing Richard Stallman's arguments for free software.)
- The Emerging NC Consensus, July 23, 2008.
