Difference between revisions of "Case Law"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Cases: description of drauglis)
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<h3>[[:Special:FormEdit/Case_Law|Add Case]]</h3>
+
There is a [[:Category:Case_Law|a listing of court decisions]] that discuss or are directly relevant to Creative Commons licenses. The decisions can come from any jurisdiction around the world. It is a list of decisions, not cases.
  
−
==Cases==
+
== Cases ==
−
{{#ask: [[Category:Case Law]]|format=category}}
+
{|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[09-1684-A_(Lichôdmapwa_v._L'asbl_Festival_de_Theatre_de_Spa)]]
 +
| Belgium 2010/10/28
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Äventyrsgruvan i Tuna Hästberg v. Gunnarsson]]
 +
| Sweden 2016-02-25
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| [[Chang v. Virgin Mobile]]
 +
| US (N.D. Tex.) 2009/01/16
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Curry v. Audax]]
 +
| Netherlands 2006/03/09
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Drauglis v. Kappa Map Group, LLC]]
 +
| US (D.C. D.C.) 2015/08/18
 +
| Atlas company's inclusion of a CC-BY-SA 2.0 photograph on the cover of an atlas did not violate the CC license. The atlas was a '''compilation''' not a derivative work, so did not need to be licensed under the SA term, and attribution on back cover was appropriate under the BY term.
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Gerlach vs. DVU]]
 +
| Germany 2010/10/08
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Internet Brands v. Holliday]]
 +
| US (C.D. Cal. 2012/11/19)
 +
| Litigation involving ownership of wiki material contributed by a broad community and licensed under CC BY-SA. At no point in either case was the validity of the CC license contested.
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Jacobsen v. Katzer]]
 +
| US (Fed. Cir.) 2010/02/22
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[No. 71036 N. v. Newspaper]]
 +
| Israel 2011/09/27
 +
| Photographer who used BY-SA licenses on his photographs had some photographs used in a Newspaper. The newspaper did not provide proper attribution.  The newspaper had also used Wikipedia text without proper attribution.
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[SGAE v. Fernandez]]
 +
| Spain 2006/02/17
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[SGAE v. Luis]]
 +
| Spain 2005/11/29
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[Spirit]]
 +
| Germany 2016/11/18
 +
| German court required removal of hyperlink to CC-licensed image used in violation of license terms. ''Note: the parties names are redacted in the published decision. The case number is ref. 310 O 402/16.''
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[TA 3560/09, 3561/09, Avi Re'uveni v. Mapa inc. ישראל: לראשונה, ביהמ"ש אכף רישיון קריאייטיב קומונס]]
 +
| Israel 
 +
|
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
To add a new court decision to [[:Category:Case_Law|the list]], create a new page here on the wiki and add a copy of [[Template:Case_Law|the Case Law template]] and edit it to contain details of the case. Then add a link to the case to the list above.
 +
 
 +
If you are unfamiliar with creating pages, [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Starting_a_new_page instructions are available] There are also [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Templates comprehensive guides] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:A_quick_guide_to_templates quick start instructions] for working with wiki templates. If you are unfamiliar with creating Wiki tables, [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Tables instructions are available for this as well].
 +
 
 +
For cases taking place across multiple courts, add separate pages for each decision.

Latest revision as of 15:10, 9 August 2017

There is a a listing of court decisions that discuss or are directly relevant to Creative Commons licenses. The decisions can come from any jurisdiction around the world. It is a list of decisions, not cases.

Cases

09-1684-A_(Lichôdmapwa_v._L'asbl_Festival_de_Theatre_de_Spa) Belgium 2010/10/28
Äventyrsgruvan i Tuna Hästberg v. Gunnarsson Sweden 2016-02-25
Chang v. Virgin Mobile US (N.D. Tex.) 2009/01/16
Curry v. Audax Netherlands 2006/03/09
Drauglis v. Kappa Map Group, LLC US (D.C. D.C.) 2015/08/18 Atlas company's inclusion of a CC-BY-SA 2.0 photograph on the cover of an atlas did not violate the CC license. The atlas was a compilation not a derivative work, so did not need to be licensed under the SA term, and attribution on back cover was appropriate under the BY term.
Gerlach vs. DVU Germany 2010/10/08
Internet Brands v. Holliday US (C.D. Cal. 2012/11/19) Litigation involving ownership of wiki material contributed by a broad community and licensed under CC BY-SA. At no point in either case was the validity of the CC license contested.
Jacobsen v. Katzer US (Fed. Cir.) 2010/02/22
No. 71036 N. v. Newspaper Israel 2011/09/27 Photographer who used BY-SA licenses on his photographs had some photographs used in a Newspaper. The newspaper did not provide proper attribution. The newspaper had also used Wikipedia text without proper attribution.
SGAE v. Fernandez Spain 2006/02/17
SGAE v. Luis Spain 2005/11/29
Spirit Germany 2016/11/18 German court required removal of hyperlink to CC-licensed image used in violation of license terms. Note: the parties names are redacted in the published decision. The case number is ref. 310 O 402/16.
TA 3560/09, 3561/09, Avi Re'uveni v. Mapa inc. ישראל: לראשונה, ביהמ"ש אכף רישיון קריאייטיב קומונס Israel

To add a new court decision to the list, create a new page here on the wiki and add a copy of the Case Law template and edit it to contain details of the case. Then add a link to the case to the list above.

If you are unfamiliar with creating pages, instructions are available There are also comprehensive guides and quick start instructions for working with wiki templates. If you are unfamiliar with creating Wiki tables, instructions are available for this as well.

For cases taking place across multiple courts, add separate pages for each decision.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Case_Law&oldid=116375"