Difference between revisions of "Liblicense 03 release todo"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(formal)
(formal)
Line 57: Line 57:
 
* <del>http://linuxmagazine.com/ - editors@linux-mag.com</del>
 
* <del>http://linuxmagazine.com/ - editors@linux-mag.com</del>
 
** <del>PR: ???</del>
 
** <del>PR: ???</del>
* http://linuxuser.co.uk - http://linuxuser.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=48&Itemid=40
+
* <del>http://linuxuser.co.uk</del>
** PR: terry@linuxuser.co.uk
+
** <del>PR: terry@linuxuser.co.uk</del>
 
* http://www.tuxmagazine.com/ - editor@tuxmagazine.com
 
* http://www.tuxmagazine.com/ - editor@tuxmagazine.com
 
** PR: ???
 
** PR: ???

Revision as of 21:31, 31 July 2007

  • issues
    • Nautilus writes a license to every file whose property dialog is displayed
    • license chooser returns devnations -- should we mark this as retired and then not return retired licenses? (added isReplacedBy by/3.0)
    • Unicode filename issues? Licenses aren't loaded for some test files with Japanese filenames. (Um, seems to work fine, now) (0.4)
    • Update gui_gtk.py to use license chooser API once the above is taken care of
    • configure --prefix=/usr/local dies trying to install the python bindings
      • libtool: install: error: cannot install `liblicense.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/liblicense
      • Update: works after a 'make distclean'
    • new license chooser API not wrapped in Ruby (0.4)
    • nautilus emblems don't work for me (Needed to touch /usr/share/icons/hicolor on installation)
    • No sampling licenses' RDF include the prohibits commericial use statement
  • package press release
  • tag svn
  • package
    • source
    • rpm
    • deb
    • ebuild (Exempi, nautilus-python, and Liblicense ebuilds, courtesy of jakin)

publicity

informal

formal

other