Difference between revisions of "Liblicense 03 release todo"
m |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
** <del>ebuild</del> (Exempi, nautilus-python, and Liblicense ebuilds, courtesy of jakin) | ** <del>ebuild</del> (Exempi, nautilus-python, and Liblicense ebuilds, courtesy of jakin) | ||
** test them! | ** test them! | ||
| + | ** Known dependencies. | ||
| + | *** libraptor | ||
| + | *** nautilus-python | ||
| + | *** exempi | ||
* publicity | * publicity | ||
| Line 34: | Line 38: | ||
** digg (?) | ** digg (?) | ||
** slashdot (?) | ** slashdot (?) | ||
| + | ** Boing Boing (?) | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 30 July 2007
- issues
Nautilus writes a license to every file whose property dialog is displayedlicense chooser returns devnations -- should we mark this as retired and then not return retired licenses?(added isReplacedBy by/3.0)Unicode filename issues? Licenses aren't loaded for some test files with Japanese filenames.(Um, seems to work fine, now) (0.4)Update gui_gtk.py to use license chooser API once the above is taken care ofconfigure --prefix=/usr/local dies trying to install the python bindings- libtool: install: error: cannot install `liblicense.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/liblicense
- Update: works after a 'make distclean'
new license chooser API not wrapped in Ruby(0.4)nautilus emblems don't work for me(Needed to touch /usr/share/icons/hicolor on installation)No sampling licenses' RDF include the prohibits commericial use statement
- package press release
- tag svn
- package
- source
- rpm
- deb
ebuild(Exempi, nautilus-python, and Liblicense ebuilds, courtesy of jakin)- test them!
- Known dependencies.
- libraptor
- nautilus-python
- exempi
- publicity
- mailing lists
- cc-devel
- cc-community
- freshmeat
- sourceforge
- cc frontpage blog (written)
- press release
- packaged PRESS file
cc techblog how to(Liblicense_tutorial)- digg (?)
- slashdot (?)
- Boing Boing (?)
- mailing lists
