Difference between revisions of "Custom Licenses"
(Created page with "Open Government License UK UK Parliament France Italy Norway CUSTOM LICENSES Canada http://www.data.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=46D15882-1 >Montreal - http://donnees.vill...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:59, 11 June 2012
Open Government License UK UK Parliament France Italy Norway
CUSTOM LICENSES
Canada http://www.data.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=46D15882-1 >Montreal - http://donnees.ville.montreal.qc.ca/licence
France at local level, several different licenses used federal level, there is a new national license: http://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/4/37/99/26/licence/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence-ENG.pdf
Peru
UK OGL is the policy for central government Open Data (and extends to almost all non-charged Crown Copyright material automatically) and is recommended for local authorities and wider public sector (in LA sector over 50% have adopted it already). http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/
OGL-NC: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/non-commercial-government-licence/ Parliament - http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/open-parliament-licence/
Ireland (not sure if this was created by the government because I saw a recent blog post calling for the Irish government to create its own OGL-type license) Nevertheless, the Irish PSI license is reportedly a fairly popular license: http://psi.gov.ie/files/2010/03/PSI-Licence.pdf
Italy http://www.formez.it/iodl/
Norway created its own BY licence because CC does not have database rights http://data.norge.no/blogg/2011/04/about-norwegian-licence-open-data-nlod
British Columbia http://www.data.gov.bc.ca/dbc/admin/terms.page
Japan