Difference between revisions of "Case Studies/Evaluation"
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
! B-Class | ! B-Class | ||
| | | | ||
| − | * Contains | + | * Contains good, complete descriptions of the use. |
* Has an image and short description, but might be missing one or two data fields. | * Has an image and short description, but might be missing one or two data fields. | ||
* May need small improvements writing style, gammar, spelling, etc. | * May need small improvements writing style, gammar, spelling, etc. | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
! C-Class | ! C-Class | ||
| | | | ||
| − | * Contains an adequate description of the use. | + | * Contains an adequate description (both short and full) of the use. |
* Some missing image, quote, or metadata. | * Some missing image, quote, or metadata. | ||
* May contain unclear language or obviously incorrect grammar. | * May contain unclear language or obviously incorrect grammar. | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 24 August 2010
It's important for Creative Commons to be able to talk about the impact that our licenses have on the web. Part of this involves collecting use cases from different domains and aggregating some useful metrics. The Case Studies database aims to enable that in addition to providing a way for our community to search and discover interesting uses. But in order for a database like this to be useful, it has to have good solid information.
Evaluation Guide
There are only two axes for evaluating a Case Study on this wiki: Quality and Importance.
Quality
- Quality should be re-assessed following any substantial edits to a Case Study.
| Class | Criteria | Suggested Edits | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-Class |
|
|
|
| B-Class |
|
|
|
| C-Class |
|
|
|
| Start |
|
||
| Stub |
|
