Difference between revisions of "Case Studies/Evaluation"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Quality)
(→‎Quality)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
{| cellpadding="5" class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
 
{| cellpadding="5" class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
 
! style="width:10%;" |Class
 
! style="width:10%;" |Class
−
! style="width:30%;" |Criteria
+
! style="width:40%;" |Criteria
−
! style="width:30%;" |Reader Experience
 
 
! style="width:30%;" |Suggested Edits
 
! style="width:30%;" |Suggested Edits
 +
! style="width:20%;" |Examples
 
|-
 
|-
 
! A-Class
 
! A-Class

Revision as of 18:00, 24 August 2010

It's important for Creative Commons to be able to talk about the impact that our licenses have on the web. Part of this involves collecting use cases from different domains and aggregating some useful metrics. The Case Studies database aims to enable that in addition to providing a way for our community to search and discover interesting uses. But in order for a database like this to be useful, it has to have good solid information.

Evaluation Guide

There are only two axes for evaluating a Case Study on this wiki: Quality and Importance.

Quality

Class Criteria Suggested Edits Examples
A-Class
  • Contains a concise and complete description of the use.
  • Explains the novelty and importance of the use-case.
  • Has an accompanying image with attribution information.
  • Would be worthy of being featured elsewhere on the web.
B-Class
  • Contains a good description of the use.
  • Has an image.
C-Class
  • Contains an adequate description of the use.
Start
  • Has the beginnings of a descriptions of the use.
Stub
  • Has no description.

Importance

Needs Evaluation

Retrieved from "https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Case_Studies/Evaluation&oldid=40400"