Difference between revisions of "Talk:Content Directories"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎wow, I have to say I love creative commons in theory)
(→‎wow, I have to say I love creative commons in theory)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
----
 
----
  
−
== wow, I have to say I love creative commons in theory ==
 
−
...practice not so much.  I made an album, it went out of print thanks to Tower Records so I decided that I wanted to give it away, its a christmas record, but not a sucky one so I t seemed in keeping with the spirt.  I gave it a creative commons license. So that it could live new exciting lives as soundtracks or samples or what have you.  I wanted to list it so that  it could be  searchable within CC.  Almost two hours later I have yet to find a place to put anything.  Now if i had remixed my music, there are forty places to do that.  but where can you give something, thats not remixed? it seems like a simple content directory would be so much more useful. uggh sorry I know this isn't the ranting space, that is probably hid under some obscure sub menu three levels down,
 
  
−
so heres the deal if someone wants  to  list this somewhere cool
 
−
its a christmas record: Snaildartha : the story of Jerry the Christmas Snail-which is more a less a retelling of
 
  
 
==Agnula Libre Music==
 
==Agnula Libre Music==

Revision as of 08:55, 11 March 2009

<math>Insert formula here</math>== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==

I started an open soapmaking wiki in which all content is Creative Commons licensed. So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups. I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site. Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful. I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it. But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info. If anyone can help, please help me. People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site. I'm not even running ads. I work as a web developer. This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing. I have one other moderator. There seems to be a trust disconnect. Maybe there's just not enough information there yet. Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com. or find me here

simuze and promocioname need to be re-added

openphoto.net?<math>Insert formula here</math>HECTOR^+LOPEZ

== agnula libre music has been down for months ==File:Example.jpgGOOGLE


Agnula Libre Music

  • Main URL: http://muzik.agnula.org/
  • CC-only portal: almost everything is CC-licensed (some EFF OAL)
  • CC-only feed: ?
  • Formats: audio
  • Size and scope of CC-licensed collection: ?
  • Notes:

Removed this from the article. Mike Linksvayer 21:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I would like to ad a new section for this but I don't know how..

Website URLs?

For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. BlankVerse 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

'education' and 'geodata' are not content formats

Well, at least education isn't.

I removed the education and geodata queries -- they weren't working properly as those are not allowable values of Property:Format

I suspect we should have another property that education would be the value of (audience?).

We may want to add geodata as a format, but I'm not sure -- there are lots of other kinds of data, and licensing around any of them is controversial. Mike Linksvayer 03:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&oldid=21380"