Difference between revisions of "Talk:Content Directories"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(Website URLs?: new section)
('education' and 'geodata' are not content formats: new section)
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. ''[[User:BlankVerse|<font color="green">Blank</font>]][[User talk:BlankVerse|<font color="#F88017">Verse</font>]]'' 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 
For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. ''[[User:BlankVerse|<font color="green">Blank</font>]][[User talk:BlankVerse|<font color="#F88017">Verse</font>]]'' 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== 'education' and 'geodata' are not content formats ==
 +
 +
Well, at least education isn't.
 +
 +
I removed the education and geodata queries -- they weren't working properly as those are not allowable values of [[Property:Format]]
 +
 +
I suspect we should have another property that education would be the value of (audience?).
 +
 +
We may want to add geodata as a format, but I'm not sure -- there are lots of other kinds of data, and licensing around any of them is controversial.

Revision as of 03:29, 7 July 2008

<math>Insert formula here</math>== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==

I started an open soapmaking wiki in which all content is Creative Commons licensed. So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups. I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site. Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful. I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it. But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info. If anyone can help, please help me. People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site. I'm not even running ads. I work as a web developer. This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing. I have one other moderator. There seems to be a trust disconnect. Maybe there's just not enough information there yet. Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com. or find me here

simuze and promocioname need to be re-added

openphoto.net?<math>Insert formula here</math>HECTOR^+LOPEZ

== agnula libre music has been down for months ==File:Example.jpgGOOGLE


wow, I have to say I love creative commons in theory

...practice not so much. I made an album, it went out of print thanks to Tower Records so I decided that I wanted to give it away, its a christmas record, but not a sucky one so I t seemed in keeping with the spirt. I gave it a creative commons license. So that it could live new exciting lives as soundtracks or samples or what have you. I wanted to list it so that it could be searchable within CC. Almost two hours later I have yet to find a place to put anything. Now if i had remixed my music, there are forty places to do that. but where can you give something, thats not remixed? it seems like a simple content directory would be so much more useful. uggh sorry I know this isn't the ranting space, that is probably hid under some obscure sub menu three levels down,

so heres the deal if someone wants to list this somewhere cool its a christmas record: Snaildartha : the story of Jerry the Christmas Snail-which is more a less a retelling of the life of Buddha...only through a Holiday snail.. and its Soul Jazz.

Currently it lives here Snaildartha[1]

If someone doesn't want to list it somewhere, thats fine too,

Agnula Libre Music

  • Main URL: http://muzik.agnula.org/
  • CC-only portal: almost everything is CC-licensed (some EFF OAL)
  • CC-only feed: ?
  • Formats: audio
  • Size and scope of CC-licensed collection: ?
  • Notes:

Removed this from the article. Mike Linksvayer 21:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I would like to ad a new section for this but I don't know how..

Website URLs?

For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. BlankVerse 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

'education' and 'geodata' are not content formats

Well, at least education isn't.

I removed the education and geodata queries -- they weren't working properly as those are not allowable values of Property:Format

I suspect we should have another property that education would be the value of (audience?).

We may want to add geodata as a format, but I'm not sure -- there are lots of other kinds of data, and licensing around any of them is controversial.