Difference between revisions of "CCWiki talk:About"
(License bug) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:at the bottom of the pages there is a link to 3.0 license, right? but the image on the bottom/left links to 2.5 | :at the bottom of the pages there is a link to 3.0 license, right? but the image on the bottom/left links to 2.5 | ||
:i couldn't find where to report bugs so i'm doing it here --[[User:Lo'oris|Lo'oris]] 18:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | :i couldn't find where to report bugs so i'm doing it here --[[User:Lo'oris|Lo'oris]] 18:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Community Portal? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I wonder why it was decided to create a view that's completely totally different from the normal MediaWiki view. Also, does this wiki have a [[project:Community Portal]]? I'd suggest creating one and/or putting up a more prominent link to it :) [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 20:30, 14 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I forgot to mention that it ''does'' look good the standard look of this wiki, compared to the Monobook view that I chose now, but in terms of functionality it's not great (especially for people like me who are very much used to MediaWiki). The problem with the Monobook setting here though is that it still has the default "Set $wg.." logo from MediaWiki - and [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] doesn't make sense right now, with links to pages that are not used. [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 20:33, 14 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:33, 15 September 2007
Click on the '+' next to 'Edit' to add a section like this one
If you're logged in you'll see that above. Don't forget to sign your comments. ~~~~ (four tildes) will expand to something like this: Mike Linksvayer 23:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
License bug
- at the bottom of the pages there is a link to 3.0 license, right? but the image on the bottom/left links to 2.5
- i couldn't find where to report bugs so i'm doing it here --Lo'oris 18:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Community Portal?
I wonder why it was decided to create a view that's completely totally different from the normal MediaWiki view. Also, does this wiki have a project:Community Portal? I'd suggest creating one and/or putting up a more prominent link to it :) guaka 20:30, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
I forgot to mention that it does look good the standard look of this wiki, compared to the Monobook view that I chose now, but in terms of functionality it's not great (especially for people like me who are very much used to MediaWiki). The problem with the Monobook setting here though is that it still has the default "Set $wg.." logo from MediaWiki - and MediaWiki:Sidebar doesn't make sense right now, with links to pages that are not used. guaka 20:33, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
