Difference between revisions of "Spirit"
(Created page with "{{Case Law |title=ref. 310 O 402/16 |region=Germany |court=Regional Court of Hamburg (Landgericht Hamburg) |date=2016/11/18 |description=German court upheld removal of hyperli...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|court=Regional Court of Hamburg (Landgericht Hamburg) | |court=Regional Court of Hamburg (Landgericht Hamburg) | ||
|date=2016/11/18 | |date=2016/11/18 | ||
| − | |description=German court | + | |description=German court required removal of hyperlink to CC-licensed image used in violation of license terms |
| + | |||
| + | ''Note: the parties names are redacted in the published decision. The case number is ref. 310 O 402/16.'' | ||
| + | |||
|summary=BACKGROUND | |summary=BACKGROUND | ||
Latest revision as of 14:09, 30 March 2017
Country/Region
Germany
Court name
Regional Court of Hamburg (Landgericht Hamburg)
Published
2016/11/18
More decisions in this case
Description
German court required removal of hyperlink to CC-licensed image used in violation of license terms
Note: the parties names are redacted in the published decision. The case number is ref. 310 O 402/16.
Case summary
BACKGROUND
A German website posted a hyperlink to image on another website. That image was available under a CC license, but the website where the image was posted had not complied with the CC license terms and was therefore in violation of the copyright. The photographer who had taken the image filed a lawsuit requesting that the German website take down the link.
RESULT
The court granted an injunction requiring that the link be removed from the German website.
TAKEAWAY
This case was an interpretation of an earlier European Court of Justice ruling that held that a website that would be held liable for copyright infringement when it posted links to infringing material intending to make a profit. The court in this case broadly interpreted what it means for a link to be posted "for profit," stating that the determination is made based on whether the website is intended to make money and not based on whether publishing the particular hyperlink in question was.
As it relates to CC licenses, the significance of the case is that the court took as a given that using a CC license in violation of its terms constitutes copyright infringement.
Full decision here (in German)
