Difference between revisions of "LRMI/Face-to-Face"
(→Accessibility (10:15-11)) |
(→Meeting Agenda) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Meeting Agenda == | == Meeting Agenda == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Arrive at CC Headquarters (9am) === | ||
+ | * Shuttle provided for those staying at the arranged hotel | ||
=== Kickoff (9-9:30) === | === Kickoff (9-9:30) === | ||
Line 50: | Line 53: | ||
=== Next Steps, added agenda items (2:45-4pm) === | === Next Steps, added agenda items (2:45-4pm) === | ||
* What to say at Schema.org Workshop on 21st | * What to say at Schema.org Workshop on 21st | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Shuttle back to hotel and airport === |
Revision as of 23:57, 6 September 2011
Contents
- 1 Meeting Details
- 2 Meeting Agenda
- 2.1 Arrive at CC Headquarters (9am)
- 2.2 Kickoff (9-9:30)
- 2.3 Schema.org (9:30-10)
- 2.4 Break (10-10:15)
- 2.5 Accessibility (10:15-11)
- 2.6 Competencies/Outcomes/Standards (11-12:45)
- 2.7 Brian Carver’s Report and latent consensus items (1-2:30)
- 2.8 Break (2:30-2:45)
- 2.9 Next Steps, added agenda items (2:45-4pm)
- 2.10 Shuttle back to hotel and airport
Meeting Details
- Date: September 8th
- Time: 9am-4pm Pacific
- Location: CC Headquarters in Mountain View
- Remote participation:
- Call in number: 1.712.432.0850
- Participant Code: 902720#
Meeting Agenda
Arrive at CC Headquarters (9am)
- Shuttle provided for those staying at the arranged hotel
Kickoff (9-9:30)
coffee and bagels provided
Schema.org (9:30-10)
- Background informs rest of project
- How does Schema.org see LRMI?
- Genaral extension mechanisms generally?
- What would be useful for LRMI to say at Sept 21 workshop?
- Is schema.org addressing a11y generally?
Break (10-10:15)
Accessibility (10:15-11)
- Depending on Schema.org discussion, what parts can/should LRMI provide?
- See:
- ISO 24751 part 3 (page 7, section 5.4)
- Dublin Core Accessibility Wiki with Use Cases
- EDItEUR - "Proposals for e-book accessibility description in ONIX" (pdf) DRAFT
- Universal Design for Learning - Guidelines version 2.0 (doc)
Competencies/Outcomes/Standards (11-12:45)
- How can we provide the ability to encode this information in LRMI from the broadest set of available references?
- Pertinent Use Cases:
- netTrekker - Educator plans a lesson that accommodates multiple instructional strategies (Google doc)
- netTrekker - Publisher parses large instructional resource so the components can be referenced with a Dynamic Learning Environment (Google doc)
- netTrekker - Search for instructional resources to support a personal learning goal (Google doc)
- netTrekker - Curriculum specialist identifies effective resources in the context of purchasing new materials to support curriculum (Google doc)
(lunch brought in at noon)
Brian Carver’s Report and latent consensus items (1-2:30)
- Brian shares his report
- We work on generating the list of latent consensus items
- Pertinent Use Cases:
- UCT - University of Cape Town OpenContent (pdf)
- Pearson - Pearson Education North America Curriculum (doc)
Break (2:30-2:45)
Next Steps, added agenda items (2:45-4pm)
- What to say at Schema.org Workshop on 21st