Difference between revisions of "Case Studies/Dan Gillmor"
(→Motivations) |
(→Impact) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Impact == | == Impact == | ||
| − | ' | + | From Dan Gillmor's http://mediactive.com/epilogue-and-thanks/: |
| − | + | <blockquote>"Almost a decade after Creative Commons was founded, and despite ample evidence that licensing copyrighted works this way doesn’t harm sales, book publishers remain mostly clueless about this option, or hostile to it. As David explained to editors, the main reason I’m still getting royalty checks for We the Media is that the book has been available as a free download since the day it went into bookstores. This is how word about it spread. Had we not published it that way, given the indifference (at best) shown by American newspapers and magazines, the book would have sunk without a trace."</blockquote> | |
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>"Incidentally, had I signed with a traditional publisher, the book would not have reached the marketplace for a year or more from the date when I signed. With a company like Lulu, you wrap up the project and you’re off to the races. In a fast-moving area like media, that’s a huge benefit to foregoing the standard route."</blockquote> | ||
== Technical Details == | == Technical Details == | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 16 December 2010
—
Overview
Please provide an overview of the work. Describe the author or organization (location, funding/business model, partner organizations), objectives, current projects.
Delete the above questions and add text here.
License Usage
Please specify the license adopted. How is the license applied? Can you provide any available statistics? What has been the author or organization's experience with Creative Commons licenses so far – what have been the benefits and lessons learned?
Delete the above questions and add text here.
Motivations
Impact
From Dan Gillmor's http://mediactive.com/epilogue-and-thanks/:
"Almost a decade after Creative Commons was founded, and despite ample evidence that licensing copyrighted works this way doesn’t harm sales, book publishers remain mostly clueless about this option, or hostile to it. As David explained to editors, the main reason I’m still getting royalty checks for We the Media is that the book has been available as a free download since the day it went into bookstores. This is how word about it spread. Had we not published it that way, given the indifference (at best) shown by American newspapers and magazines, the book would have sunk without a trace."
"Incidentally, had I signed with a traditional publisher, the book would not have reached the marketplace for a year or more from the date when I signed. With a company like Lulu, you wrap up the project and you’re off to the races. In a fast-moving area like media, that’s a huge benefit to foregoing the standard route."
Technical Details
Provide any technical details of the implementation here
Media
Please include any screenshots, logos, links to videos, audio files, press hits, etc. To upload a file, open a separate window and click through Special:Upload.
Delete the above questions and add text here.
