Difference between revisions of "DiscussionDraftNonCommercial Guidelines"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Thank you for your interest in the NC license term. If you are looking for the document previously posted on this page as the "NC Draft Discussion Guidelines", please be aware that having served its purpose to prompt discussion of the NC term, it has been taken down. As a result of feedback on the draft discussion guidelines and many other conversations that have taken place within the community, CC has begun a major study focused on understandings of "noncommercial use". The results of this study, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, will be made publicly available in 2009. For more information on the study, you can read the [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/9557 announcement].
 
Thank you for your interest in the NC license term. If you are looking for the document previously posted on this page as the "NC Draft Discussion Guidelines", please be aware that having served its purpose to prompt discussion of the NC term, it has been taken down. As a result of feedback on the draft discussion guidelines and many other conversations that have taken place within the community, CC has begun a major study focused on understandings of "noncommercial use". The results of this study, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, will be made publicly available in 2009. For more information on the study, you can read the [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/9557 announcement].
  
As part of the study, later this year CC is conducting a poll of interested community members. Please [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/11045 read the announcement and participate!]
+
Please watch the [http://creativecommons.org/weblog CC blog] for opportunities to participate.
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>

Revision as of 18:27, 3 February 2009