Difference between revisions of "Talk:Frequently Asked Questions"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(u)
(Anyone can discuss the FAQ here)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
At the end of the first question a sentence containing questionable grammar appears. <--The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via Creative Commons-enabled search engines. -->  I understand the intent of the answer but the poor grammar may be confusing to non-native English speakers - and irritating to native English speakers.
 
At the end of the first question a sentence containing questionable grammar appears. <--The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via Creative Commons-enabled search engines. -->  I understand the intent of the answer but the poor grammar may be confusing to non-native English speakers - and irritating to native English speakers.
 +
 +
----------------
  
 
In the response to the question: "I used part of a Creative Commons-licensed work, which Creative Commons license can I relicense my work under?"
 
In the response to the question: "I used part of a Creative Commons-licensed work, which Creative Commons license can I relicense my work under?"

Revision as of 06:47, 6 June 2009

Anyone can discuss the FAQ here

Although the article is only editable by admins.

At the end of the first question a sentence containing questionable grammar appears. <--The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via Creative Commons-enabled search engines. --> I understand the intent of the answer but the poor grammar may be confusing to non-native English speakers - and irritating to native English speakers.


In the response to the question: "I used part of a Creative Commons-licensed work, which Creative Commons license can I relicense my work under?"

The second paragraph contains the sentence: "Thus, for example, if you are using work issued under an Attribution-NoDerivatives license, you may be able to relicense it under either another Attribution-NoDerivatives license or an Attribution-NonCommercial license."

It would make more sense to me if that sentence were replaced with: "Thus, for example, if you are using work issued under an Attribution-NoDerivatives license, you may be able to relicense it under either another Attribution-NoDerivatives license or an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license."

In the first two questions ("how to apply a license"), could you add a link to License_HTML_Code, as that information seems to be missing from this site and from creativecommons.org? (If it's not missing, then providing a link to it would be helpful.) The License_HTML_Code information is targeted more at web developers than software developers, but it should still be available somewhere, and this seems like a good spot.