Difference between revisions of "Talk:4.0/ShareAlike"
(Does it make sense to discuss "ShareAlike" generically?) |
(→How about reinstating ShareAlike (1.0)?: clarify heading) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers. | ::CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers. | ||
| − | ==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0])?== | + | ==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0] to 4.0)?== |
Of all the licenses CC has ever produced, the Share-Alike license ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0]) is closest to (a suggested) Libre Puro License. | Of all the licenses CC has ever produced, the Share-Alike license ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0]) is closest to (a suggested) Libre Puro License. | ||
Revision as of 02:02, 11 December 2011
Why not?
-
- e.g. CC-BY-SA is conceptually very different from CC-BY-NC-SA.
- CC-BY-SA is pro-freedom for society.
- CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers.
Of all the licenses CC has ever produced, the Share-Alike license (1.0) is closest to (a suggested) Libre Puro License.
Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this discussion (on ShareAlike 4.0).
Is there room to consider formalisation of something as pro-freedom as this?
See:
http://wikieducator.org/Libre_Puro_License
the preamble:
http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License#Preamble_for_the_Libre_Puro_License
and the license deed:
http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License_Draft_Creative_Commons_Deed
Thanks :-) - Kt 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
