Difference between revisions of "Liblicense 03 release todo"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(informal)
(informal)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
** <del>cc-devel</del>
 
** <del>cc-devel</del>
 
** <del>cc-community</del>
 
** <del>cc-community</del>
* <del>sourceforge</del>
+
* <del>sourceforge</del> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=721153
 
* <del>cc frontpage blog ('''written''')</del>
 
* <del>cc frontpage blog ('''written''')</del>
* <del>digg</del>
+
* <del>digg</del> http://digg.com/software/Creative_Commons_releases_licensing_on_the_desktop
 
* <del>Boing Boing</del>
 
* <del>Boing Boing</del>
 
* <del>lwn@lwn.net</del>
 
* <del>lwn@lwn.net</del>

Revision as of 22:38, 3 August 2007

  • issues
    • Nautilus writes a license to every file whose property dialog is displayed
    • license chooser returns devnations -- should we mark this as retired and then not return retired licenses? (added isReplacedBy by/3.0)
    • Unicode filename issues? Licenses aren't loaded for some test files with Japanese filenames. (Um, seems to work fine, now) (0.4)
    • Update gui_gtk.py to use license chooser API once the above is taken care of
    • configure --prefix=/usr/local dies trying to install the python bindings
      • libtool: install: error: cannot install `liblicense.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/liblicense
      • Update: works after a 'make distclean'
    • new license chooser API not wrapped in Ruby (0.4)
    • nautilus emblems don't work for me (Needed to touch /usr/share/icons/hicolor on installation)
    • No sampling licenses' RDF include the prohibits commericial use statement
  • package press release
  • tag svn
  • package
    • source
    • rpm
    • deb
    • ebuild (Exempi, nautilus-python, and Liblicense ebuilds, courtesy of jakin)

publicity

informal

formal

other