Difference between revisions of "Government2"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(United States)
(United States)
Line 214: Line 214:
 
* The city of Washington, D.C. has made available an unofficial copy of the [http://dccouncil.us/UnofficialDCCode DC Code] under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
 
* The city of Washington, D.C. has made available an unofficial copy of the [http://dccouncil.us/UnofficialDCCode DC Code] under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
  
=== Local government ===
 
* [http://recoverysf.org/intranet/RecoverySF/ RecoverySF], CC BY 3.0 US.
 
  
 
See [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Intergovernmental_Organizations Intergovernmental Organizations] page for information about CC license use by Intergovernmental Organizations such as the World Bank, United Nations, and the Commonwealth of Learning.
 
See [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Intergovernmental_Organizations Intergovernmental Organizations] page for information about CC license use by Intergovernmental Organizations such as the World Bank, United Nations, and the Commonwealth of Learning.

Revision as of 23:06, 5 February 2014

Argentina


Australia

Australian government reports recommending CC usage

Austria

Open Government Data Portal by the City of Vienna under CC BY.

Brazil

Bulgaria

Canada

  • Canada has developed the Government of Canada Open Data License Agreement for their open data portal website Government of Canada Open Data Pilot Project. While not a Creative Commons license it would seem that this is heavily inspired by the Creative Commons philosophy and has many similar aspects. The license includes sections on 1.0 Definitions; 2.0 Intellectual Property Rights; 3.0 License Grant; 4.0 Acknowledgement of Source; 5.0 No Warranty and no Liability; and 6.0 Effective Date and Termination.
  • The license permits individuals or commercial interests to use, reproduce, or add value to government data provided they use the required attribution and that they do not imply any warranty to, nor make any claim of exclusive rights to the data.
  • This has similarities to the Open Government Licence for public sector information used in the United Kingdom as seen farther down this list.

Chile

Croatia

  • http://otvorenikod.nsk.hr - Centar za otvoreni kod, Nacionalna i sveučilišna knjižnica u Zagrebu / Center for Open Source, National and University Library in Zagreb, licensed under CC BY SA 3.0 Croatia.

Czech Republic

Georgia

Greece

Guatemala

Israel

Italy

Korea

Macedonia

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

  • NZ Government Open Access and Licensing (NZGOAL) framework standardises the licensing of government copyright works for re-use using Creative Commons licences and recommends the use of ‘no-known rights’ statements for non-copyright material. It is widely recognised that re-use of this material by individuals and organisations may have significant creative and economic benefit for New Zealand. It was released for public discussion on August 27, 2009 and approved by Cabinet on July 5, 2010. The framework will enable greater access to many public sector works by encouraging State Services agencies to license material for reuse on liberal terms, and recommends Creative Commons as an important tool in this process.
  • In 2011 The Ministers of Finance and Internal Affairs adopted a statement detailing a new Declaration on Open and Transparent Government. The Declaration has been approved by Cabinet, and directs all Public Service departments, the New Zealand Police, the New Zealand Defence Force, the Parliamentary Counsel Office, and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service; encouraged other State Services agencies; and invited State Sector agencies to commit to releasing high value public data actively for re-use, in accordance with the Declaration and Principles, and in accordance with the NZGOAL Review and Release process.

Poland

Russian Federation

Serbia

Spain

Taiwan

Ukraine

United Kingdom

Venezuela

  • The Canaima project aims to give one laptop computer to every pupil in Venezuela (300,000 computers has been distributed so far) is preloaded with educational content (about 400 pieces of content) all of it is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

United States

Federal

State

  • New York State Senate, Senate Content, CC-BY-NC-ND with CC+ allowing non-political fundraising use of content.
  • State of Virginia, legislation that indicates a preference for state-funded materials to be released with a CC (or equivalent open) license.
  • Washington State open policy and requirement of CC BY
  • New Hampshire adopts Open Source and Open Data requirements (policy friendly to CC use, but not a specific CC tool adoption)
  • OER K-12 bill passed in WA state. The focus of the bill is to help school districts identify existing high-quality, free, openly licensed, common core state standards aligned resources available for local adoption; in addition, any content built with public funds, must be licensed under “an attribution license” (CC BY)
  • The city of Washington, D.C. has made available an unofficial copy of the DC Code under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.


See Intergovernmental Organizations page for information about CC license use by Intergovernmental Organizations such as the World Bank, United Nations, and the Commonwealth of Learning.