Difference between revisions of "Global Melt/Facilitator ToDo"

From Creative Commons
Jump to: navigation, search
(STFW)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Event Facilitator/Organizer To-Do-List'''
 
'''Event Facilitator/Organizer To-Do-List'''
 
  
 
A check-list for organizing events in "the Open":  
 
A check-list for organizing events in "the Open":  
  
 +
=== STFW ===
 +
google Event check-list and pick a suitable one for your event. (e.g. [http://www.thegreatevent.com/content/ap.asp?id=4 random event check-list])
  
=== 1.) STFW ===
+
=== Check sites of previous events ===
google Event check-list and pick a suitable one for your event. (e.g. [http://www.thegreatevent.com/content/ap.asp?id=4 http://www.thegreatevent.com/content/ap.asp?id=4])
+
Are you first in the world planning such an event? If yes: return to point one. Otherwise: look up respective online documention of similar or related or previous events.
  
 
+
=== Ask the collaboration question ===
=== 2.) Check sites of previous events ===
 
Are you first in the world planning such an event? If yes: return to point one. Otherwise: look up respective online documention of similar or related or previous events.
 
 
 
=== 3.) Ask the collaboration question ===
 
 
Is it necessary/helpful to do the event on your own or would the event benefit from collaboration with other (local) partners? Partner’s may facilitate your facilitation in the following way:
 
Is it necessary/helpful to do the event on your own or would the event benefit from collaboration with other (local) partners? Partner’s may facilitate your facilitation in the following way:
 
* a) Funding partners (e.g. corporate sponsors
 
* a) Funding partners (e.g. corporate sponsors
Line 22: Line 19:
 
* g) other partners  
 
* g) other partners  
  
 
+
=== Think about the participant's point of view: ===
=== 4.) Think about the participant's point of view: ===
 
 
* a) create different spaces/formats, i.e. mix open with structured sessions, talks with discussions, free and working time,  
 
* a) create different spaces/formats, i.e. mix open with structured sessions, talks with discussions, free and working time,  
 
* b) facilitate serendipity by setting the stage also aside the formal event program (e.g. breakfast at the venue, not in the hostel)
 
* b) facilitate serendipity by setting the stage also aside the formal event program (e.g. breakfast at the venue, not in the hostel)
Line 31: Line 27:
 
* f) provide coffee and, if possible, Club Mate
 
* f) provide coffee and, if possible, Club Mate
  
=== 5.) Also plan the social gatherings and circumstances ===
+
=== Plan the social gatherings and circumstances ===
 
* a) find out about social events in the city during the event
 
* a) find out about social events in the city during the event
 
* b) leave space for unorganized and spontaneous social activities
 
* b) leave space for unorganized and spontaneous social activities
 
* c) but don't underestimate the importance of organized and planned social activities as an offer to participants
 
* c) but don't underestimate the importance of organized and planned social activities as an offer to participants
  
=== 6) Documentation is critical before, during and after the event ===
+
=== Documentation is critical before, during and after the event ===
 
* a) if possible, apply for funding for documentation staffers
 
* a) if possible, apply for funding for documentation staffers
 
* b) choose one central tool for documentation and stick to it
 
* b) choose one central tool for documentation and stick to it
Line 43: Line 39:
 
* e) extensive documentation (e.g. minutes, video or audio-documentation) is helpful but you also need shorter documentation formats (e.g. one paragraph summaries of sessions, bullet point lists, biblographies, contact details, links, etc.)
 
* e) extensive documentation (e.g. minutes, video or audio-documentation) is helpful but you also need shorter documentation formats (e.g. one paragraph summaries of sessions, bullet point lists, biblographies, contact details, links, etc.)
  
 
+
=== Evaluate your event ===
=== 7.) Evaluate your event ===
 
 
* a) Ask participants for (oral or written) feedback at the venue (last day, end of workshop, etc.)
 
* a) Ask participants for (oral or written) feedback at the venue (last day, end of workshop, etc.)
 
* b) Make an internal feedback meeting among organizers and partners
 
* b) Make an internal feedback meeting among organizers and partners
 
* c) Offer the possibility for participant feedback online (e.g. public wishlist and/or Online feedback forms)
 
* c) Offer the possibility for participant feedback online (e.g. public wishlist and/or Online feedback forms)
* d) Do a follow-up evaluation when some time has passed (e.g. Sparkelz)
+
* d) Do a follow-up evaluation when some time has passed (e.g. [[Global_Melt/Sparklez|'''Sparklez''']])

Latest revision as of 17:24, 1 April 2011

Event Facilitator/Organizer To-Do-List

A check-list for organizing events in "the Open":

STFW

google Event check-list and pick a suitable one for your event. (e.g. random event check-list)

Check sites of previous events

Are you first in the world planning such an event? If yes: return to point one. Otherwise: look up respective online documention of similar or related or previous events.

Ask the collaboration question

Is it necessary/helpful to do the event on your own or would the event benefit from collaboration with other (local) partners? Partner’s may facilitate your facilitation in the following way:

  • a) Funding partners (e.g. corporate sponsors
  • b) Infrastructure partners (e.g. location, hostels)
  • c) Media partner (e.g. (local) newspapes, blogging networks, etc.)
  • d) Program partners (e.g. local initiatives, GLAM, universities, NGOs, labs, etc.)
  • e) Mobilizaton partners that help promote events among their constitutents (potentially all of the above)
  • f) individual partners (e.g. bloggers, activists) >> check out the human resource directory
  • g) other partners

Think about the participant's point of view:

  • a) create different spaces/formats, i.e. mix open with structured sessions, talks with discussions, free and working time,
  • b) facilitate serendipity by setting the stage also aside the formal event program (e.g. breakfast at the venue, not in the hostel)
  • c) breaks are important and useful in their non-goal-orientedness
  • d) redundancy is useful when it helps to find information (e.g. put the program online, on paper, send via mail and pin it on blackboards at the site)
  • e) experiment with short but interactive formats, especially in the beginning and the end of a day (e.g. quick introductory rounds; lightning talks at the end)
  • f) provide coffee and, if possible, Club Mate

Plan the social gatherings and circumstances

  • a) find out about social events in the city during the event
  • b) leave space for unorganized and spontaneous social activities
  • c) but don't underestimate the importance of organized and planned social activities as an offer to participants

Documentation is critical before, during and after the event

  • a) if possible, apply for funding for documentation staffers
  • b) choose one central tool for documentation and stick to it
  • c) start with documentation continuously during the event
  • d) make sure you have the contact details of your participants to distribute links to documentation following-up the event
  • e) extensive documentation (e.g. minutes, video or audio-documentation) is helpful but you also need shorter documentation formats (e.g. one paragraph summaries of sessions, bullet point lists, biblographies, contact details, links, etc.)

Evaluate your event

  • a) Ask participants for (oral or written) feedback at the venue (last day, end of workshop, etc.)
  • b) Make an internal feedback meeting among organizers and partners
  • c) Offer the possibility for participant feedback online (e.g. public wishlist and/or Online feedback forms)
  • d) Do a follow-up evaluation when some time has passed (e.g. Sparklez)