Case Studies/The Archilogy Institute

From Creative Commons
Revision as of 15:08, 27 May 2010 by Tru do khac (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search



[www.archilogie.net Go to URL]
License Used
unspecified
Media
Text
Adoption date unspecified
Tags
Translations

.


Evaluation Information.png
Page Importance:
Page Quality:
The Archilogy Institute addresses dynamics between enterprises, ecosystems, information systems (IT) and intellectual property (IP)under the forces of innovation and co-production. A first project initialized is to develop IT governance framework.

IT governance framework should not be proprietary but open and creative — Tru Dô-Khac

location : global

funding/business model : multiple

partner organizations : community (no central legal entity)

objectives : The Archilogy Institute pursues multiple projects depending on the community.

One project is an alternative to proprietary (copyrighted) information technology governance (IT governance) frameworks.

License Usage

Licenses adopted : all cc and copyright

How is the license applied : depending on the business model of the contributor.

Can you provide any available statistics : too early (project just started)

What has been the author or organization's experience with Creative Commons licenses so far – Tru Dô-Khac is chairman of X-Propriété-Intellectuelle (X-Intellectual-Property), a professional group within Ecole Polytechnique ParisTech alumni association. Discussed items : IP market place, dynamics between IP and IT, evolution of IP usage (such as CC use)

What have been the benefits and lessons learned? : differentiated use of IP (eg use of CC's and C) frees innovation models.

Motivations

How did the authorfirst hear about Creative Commons?

Through President Obama who placed its campaign web site change.gov under a CC

Why did he choose to license under Creative Commons? to innovate in innovation model.

Which license did he select? all CC's and C


Why ? To leverage the capability to use multiple business model

Any other issues you may have come across/comments you’d like to make : no