Difference between revisions of "Global Melt/Sparklez"
(→initial notes added on Flickr) |
(→initial notes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Sparklez= | =Sparklez= | ||
| − | ==initial notes == | + | == initial notes == |
<big>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/pipstar/sets/72157626379423306/with/5571329486/ added on Flickr]</big> | <big>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/pipstar/sets/72157626379423306/with/5571329486/ added on Flickr]</big> | ||
| − | later notes | + | == later notes == |
'''Purpose''' -- finding the best ways... to cherish sparks that happen between people @ live events. | '''Purpose''' -- finding the best ways... to cherish sparks that happen between people @ live events. | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 29 March 2011
Sparklez
initial notes
later notes
Purpose -- finding the best ways... to cherish sparks that happen between people @ live events.
First hunch -- Organisr commits to follow up, when aprticipants hand in 2 email addresses and a 1-line spark description.
Simplest unit? - An event organizer just exlpanis what a sparkle is, and provides a big sheet of paper on which they are tracked.
Lightest system? Needs: willing event organiser / sparklez admin to oversee the follow-up (using followup.cc, et al).
- At events without a [fill register?] need -- participanst willing to put emails addresses and sparklez on a wall poster.
Principle - Creating a system /more/ work intensive than the xisting setup (biz cards, pens, emmory) does not cherish the sparks, so does not meet our purpose.
(hat tip to Charlie for articulating the above)
