Difference between revisions of "Share Alike"
Craig Hubley (talk | contribs) (category:license unless it should be license_clause or something) |
(→SA, aka Share Alike.) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | __NOTOC__ | |
− | + | =SA, aka Share Alike.= | |
− | + | The Share Alike aspect requires all derivatives of a work to be licensed under the same (or a compatible) license as the original. Thus, if a person were to use parts of a BY-SA movie to create a new short film that new short film would also need to be licensed as BY-SA. The advantage of this license is that future users are not able to add new restrictions to a derivative of your work; their derivatives must be licensed the same way. This is in contrast to the Attribution-only license from CC where a derivative could be released under full copyright restrictions (All Rights Reserved). | |
− | The | + | As changes have been made to the Creative Commons licenses over the years there have been 4 versions of the BY-SA and BY-NC-SA licenses (1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0<ref name="version3">The 3.0 licenses added a compatibility clause. Creative Commons may declare a license compatible with ShareAlike, allowing it to be used instead of the exact same license for derivatives. </ref>). Creative Commons has taken steps to ensure that works licensed under one particular version of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license can be incorporated with a work from a later version. Specifically, any work that is licensed with a BY-SA or BY-NC-SA version 2.0 or higher can be used with any later version of the license. For specifics see the chart below. |
− | + | {| style="width:600px;" border="1" cellpadding="10" | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | colspan="9" align="center" | '''A Derivative can use the corresponding license version''': | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | '''If the original work was:''' || [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/ 1.0] || [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ 2.0] || [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ 2.5] || [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ 3.0] <ref name="version3"/> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/ 1.0] || style="background-color:green;" | || || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-NC-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ 1.0] || style="background-color:green;" | || || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ 2.0] || || style="background-color:green;" | || style="background-color:green;" | || style="background-color:green;" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-NC-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ 2.0] || || style="background-color:green;" | || style="background-color:green;" | || style="background-color:green;" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ 2.5] || || || style="background-color:green;" | || style="background-color:green;" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-NC-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ 2.5] || || || style="background-color:green;" | || style="background-color:green;" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ 3.0] <ref name="version3"/>|| || || || style="background-color:green;" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BY-NC-SA version [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ 3.0] <ref name="version3"/>|| || || || style="background-color:green;" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | + | <references/> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
[[category:license]] | [[category:license]] |
Latest revision as of 19:33, 24 January 2011
The Share Alike aspect requires all derivatives of a work to be licensed under the same (or a compatible) license as the original. Thus, if a person were to use parts of a BY-SA movie to create a new short film that new short film would also need to be licensed as BY-SA. The advantage of this license is that future users are not able to add new restrictions to a derivative of your work; their derivatives must be licensed the same way. This is in contrast to the Attribution-only license from CC where a derivative could be released under full copyright restrictions (All Rights Reserved).
As changes have been made to the Creative Commons licenses over the years there have been 4 versions of the BY-SA and BY-NC-SA licenses (1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0[1]). Creative Commons has taken steps to ensure that works licensed under one particular version of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license can be incorporated with a work from a later version. Specifically, any work that is licensed with a BY-SA or BY-NC-SA version 2.0 or higher can be used with any later version of the license. For specifics see the chart below.
A Derivative can use the corresponding license version: | |||||||||
If the original work was: | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 [1] | |||||
BY-SA version 1.0 | |||||||||
BY-NC-SA version 1.0 | |||||||||
BY-SA version 2.0 | |||||||||
BY-NC-SA version 2.0 | |||||||||
BY-SA version 2.5 | |||||||||
BY-NC-SA version 2.5 | |||||||||
BY-SA version 3.0 [1] | |||||||||
BY-NC-SA version 3.0 [1] |