Talk:Frequently Asked Questions - Revision history

Hamilton Abreu: /* combining different versions in a collection image */

2013-11-29T23:43:50Z

‎combining different versions in a collection image

Hamilton Abreu: /* combining different versions in a collection image */

2013-11-29T23:31:08Z

‎combining different versions in a collection image

Barbara waxer: /* combining different versions in a collection image */

2013-11-29T23:18:17Z

‎combining different versions in a collection image

Barbara waxer: /* combining different versions in a collection image */

2013-11-29T23:01:36Z

‎combining different versions in a collection image

Barbara waxer: /* combining different versions in a collection image */

2013-11-29T23:00:35Z

‎combining different versions in a collection image

Irenosal at 22:29, 19 October 2012

2012-10-19T22:29:47Z

Irenosal at 22:28, 19 October 2012

2012-10-19T22:28:08Z

PippaLyles at 22:27, 9 April 2012

2012-04-09T22:27:11Z

PippaLyles at 22:26, 9 April 2012

2012-04-09T22:26:17Z

Mcouture: /* The manner of attribution? */

2012-03-13T13:08:21Z

‎The manner of attribution?

@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
 It would be really helpful to have examples that match the content students create. Barbara Waxer Nov 29, 2013
-:Hi Barbara, section [[Frequently Asked Questions#How do I properly attribute material offered under a Creative Commons license?]] states: "CC licenses have a flexible attribution requirement, so there is not necessarily one correct way to provide attribution. The proper method for giving credit will depend on the medium and means you are using, and may be implemented in any reasonable manner. Additionally, you may satisfy the attribution requirement by providing a link to a place where the attribution information may be found.". Does his not address your concern? -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] ([[User talk:Hamilton Abreu|talk]]) 23:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
+:Hi Barbara, section [[Frequently Asked Questions#How do I properly attribute material offered under a Creative Commons license?]] states: "CC licenses have a flexible attribution requirement, so there is not necessarily one correct way to provide attribution. The proper method for giving credit will depend on the medium and means you are using, and may be implemented in any reasonable manner. Additionally, you may satisfy the attribution requirement by providing a link to a place where the attribution information may be found.". Does his not address your concern? - [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] ([[User talk:Hamilton Abreu|talk]]) 23:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 == SVG graphics ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 29 November 2013
Line 103:		Line 103:

	It would be really helpful to have examples that match the content students create. Barbara Waxer Nov 29, 2013		It would be really helpful to have examples that match the content students create. Barbara Waxer Nov 29, 2013
		+
		+	:Hi Barbara, section [[Frequently Asked Questions#How do I properly attribute material offered under a Creative Commons license?]] states: "CC licenses have a flexible attribution requirement, so there is not necessarily one correct way to provide attribution. The proper method for giving credit will depend on the medium and means you are using, and may be implemented in any reasonable manner. Additionally, you may satisfy the attribution requirement by providing a link to a place where the attribution information may be found.". Does his not address your concern? -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu\|Hamilton Abreu]] ([[User talk:Hamilton Abreu\|talk]]) 23:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

	== SVG graphics ==		== SVG graphics ==

@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Energiaberriztagarriak.jpg This] image collection uses four images. Two of them are PD or only require attribution. But two are Cc-by-sa-3.0 or Cc-by-2.0. I could not find in the FAQ what to do with the different version numbers. Is Cc-by-sa-3.0 for the complete image okay?  Or do we need to list both CC licenses separately? Would be great if I could get an answer or a section in the FAQ for this. Thank you! Cheers --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 20:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
-*******
+**
 This is a very important question for my students in Media Arts - they correctly obtain CC-A media, but feel overwhelmed on how to document their changes, especially if they've applied multiple image-editing filters, combined parts from different photos, added music, and so on. The vast majority of your markup examples assume the attribution and editing provenance can be made on the page where the content appears, which is just not possible or practicable for web content.

@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Energiaberriztagarriak.jpg This] image collection uses four images. Two of them are PD or only require attribution. But two are Cc-by-sa-3.0 or Cc-by-2.0. I could not find in the FAQ what to do with the different version numbers. Is Cc-by-sa-3.0 for the complete image okay?  Or do we need to list both CC licenses separately? Would be great if I could get an answer or a section in the FAQ for this. Thank you! Cheers --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 20:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 This is a very important question for my students in Media Arts - they correctly obtain CC-A media, but feel overwhelmed on how to document their changes, especially if they've applied multiple image-editing filters, combined parts from different photos, added music, and so on. The vast majority of your markup examples assume the attribution and editing provenance can be made on the page where the content appears, which is just not possible or practicable for web content.
-It would be really helpful to have examples that match the content students create.
+It would be really helpful to have examples that match the content students create. Barbara Waxer Nov 29, 2013
 == SVG graphics ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 29 November 2013
Line 98:		Line 98:

	[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Energiaberriztagarriak.jpg This] image collection uses four images. Two of them are PD or only require attribution. But two are Cc-by-sa-3.0 or Cc-by-2.0. I could not find in the FAQ what to do with the different version numbers. Is Cc-by-sa-3.0 for the complete image okay? Or do we need to list both CC licenses separately? Would be great if I could get an answer or a section in the FAQ for this. Thank you! Cheers --[[User:Saibo\|Saibo]] ([[User talk:Saibo\|<small>Δ</small>]]) 20:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)		[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Energiaberriztagarriak.jpg This] image collection uses four images. Two of them are PD or only require attribution. But two are Cc-by-sa-3.0 or Cc-by-2.0. I could not find in the FAQ what to do with the different version numbers. Is Cc-by-sa-3.0 for the complete image okay? Or do we need to list both CC licenses separately? Would be great if I could get an answer or a section in the FAQ for this. Thank you! Cheers --[[User:Saibo\|Saibo]] ([[User talk:Saibo\|<small>Δ</small>]]) 20:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	This is a very important question for my students in Media Arts - they correctly obtain CC-A media, but feel overwhelmed on how to document their changes, especially if they've applied multiple image-editing filters, combined parts from different photos, added music, and so on. The vast majority of your markup examples assume the attribution and editing provenance can be made on the page where the content appears, which is just not possible or practicable for web content.
		+
		+	It would be really helpful to have examples that match the content students create.

	== SVG graphics ==		== SVG graphics ==

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 Thank you very much!
-Read about [http://bestelectricshaverhq.org/ Electric shaver reviews]
+Read about
+V

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 and that
-''Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses'' [those listed at the Free Software Foundation or at the Open Source Initiative] ''were designed specifically for use with software. '' ([[Frequently Asked Questions#Can I use a Creative Commons license for] [http://www.planetsofts.com software?]].
+''Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses'' [those listed at the Free Software Foundation or at the Open Source Initiative] ''were designed specifically for use with software. '' ([[Frequently Asked Questions#Can I use a Creative Commons license for]] [http://www.planetsofts.com software?].
 I suggest that you add one more question with the following title : "Can I use a Creative Commons license for vector graphics ?", containing a warning telling people that even the least permissive CC-BY-SA license enables reusers to create derivative JPG or PNG graphics, or derivated printed material without any obligation to release their own source vector code.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 13 March 2012
Line 86:		Line 86:

	/Magnus (again)		/Magnus (again)
		+
		+	'''Comment'''
		+
		+	The intermediate layer between the CC notice and the complete legal code is a good idea, because the full text is, well... aimed at people used to legal subtelties (disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, but have read of lot of legal code). But in the present case I would say it's somewhat misleading, because it has always been clear that one of the purposes of CC licenses is to provide ''standard'' licenses, which cannot be tailored by authors according to their whishes. As Magnus rightly points out, the legal code describes precisely what is required in the matter of attribution, and contains no such thing as the possibility of additional author defined terms and conditions. Suggesting in the lay-people version that an author may specify the way attribution has to be done, and that users have to comply, goes in the entire opposite direction.
		+
		+	But I don't know how such a wording was accepted, and how it could be changed (it's not a wiki!).
		+
		+	/Mcouture

	== combining different versions in a collection image ==		== combining different versions in a collection image ==