Talk:4.0/ShareAlike - Revision history

Mike Linksvayer: fmt/sign

2011-12-11T01:58:52Z

fmt/sign

Mike Linksvayer: resposes to kt

2011-12-11T01:57:58Z

resposes to kt

Kt: /* How about reinstating ShareAlike (1.0)? */ clarify heading

2011-12-11T01:02:46Z

‎How about reinstating ShareAlike (1.0)?: clarify heading

Kt: Does it make sense to discuss "ShareAlike" generically?

2011-12-11T01:01:47Z

Does it make sense to discuss "ShareAlike" generically?

Kt: Created page with "==Libre Puro== The Share-Alike license is closest to Libre Puro of all the licenses CC has ever produced. Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this..."

2011-12-11T00:26:09Z

Created page with "==Libre Puro== The Share-Alike license is closest to Libre Puro of all the licenses CC has ever produced. Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this..."

New page

==Libre Puro==

The Share-Alike license is closest to Libre Puro of all the licenses CC has ever produced.

Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this discussion (on ShareAlike 4.0).

Is there room to consider formalisation of something as pro-freedom as this?

http://wikieducator.org/Libre_Puro_License

Please also read the preamble:

http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License#Preamble_for_the_Libre_Puro_License

and check out the license deed:

http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License_Draft_Creative_Commons_Deed

Thanks :-) - [[User:Kt|Kt]] 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::CC-BY-SA is pro-freedom for society.
 ::CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers.
+- [[User:Kt|Kt]] 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
-:Yes. Please add this to http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/NonCommercial -- it is a rationale for retiring, rebranding, or otherwise clearly demarcating BY-NC-SA as not an equivalent level of sharing as BY-SA. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
+:Yes. Please add this to http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/NonCommercial -- it is a rationale for retiring, rebranding, or otherwise clearly demarcating BY-NC-SA as not an equivalent level of sharing as BY-SA. --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 ==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0] to 4.0)?==
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 Thanks :-) - [[User:Kt|Kt]] 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
-:Highly unlikely, as explained in http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2011-December/006430.html [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
+:Highly unlikely, as explained in http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2011-December/006430.html --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::CC-BY-SA is pro-freedom for society.
 ::CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers.
 ==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0] to 4.0)?==
@@ Line 28: / Line 30: @@
 Thanks :-) - [[User:Kt|Kt]] 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ::CC-BY-NC-SA is pro-choice on behalf of authors - including the choice to impose restrictions on readers.
-==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0])?==
+==How about reinstating ShareAlike ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0] to 4.0)?==
 Of all the licenses CC has ever produced, the Share-Alike license ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ 1.0]) is closest to (a suggested) Libre Puro License.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Libre Puro==
+==Does it make sense to discuss "ShareAlike" generically?==
-The Share-Alike license is closest to Libre Puro of all the licenses CC has ever produced.
+Why not?
 Some of the rationale for the Libre Puro License might help with this discussion (on ShareAlike 4.0).
 Is there room to consider formalisation of something as pro-freedom as this?
 http://wikieducator.org/Libre_Puro_License
-Please also read the preamble:
+the preamble:
 http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License#Preamble_for_the_Libre_Puro_License
-and check out the license deed:
+and the license deed:
 http://wikieducator.org/Libre_License_Draft_Creative_Commons_Deed
 Thanks :-) - [[User:Kt|Kt]] 00:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)