ShareAlike compatibility: FAL - Revision history

CCID-shinchpearson at 16:02, 21 October 2014

2014-10-21T16:02:26Z

CCID-shinchpearson at 20:10, 4 October 2014

2014-10-04T20:10:52Z

CCID-shinchpearson at 19:49, 3 October 2014

2014-10-03T19:49:22Z

CCID-diane peters: /* Other process notes */

2014-10-03T19:10:34Z

‎Other process notes

CCID-diane peters: /* Other process notes */

2014-10-03T19:09:55Z

‎Other process notes

CCID-diane peters: /* Policy decisions and related determinations */

2014-10-03T19:07:18Z

‎Policy decisions and related determinations

CCID-diane peters: /* Official license texts */

2014-10-03T19:03:30Z

‎Official license texts

CCID-diane peters: /* Timeline */

2014-10-03T18:49:14Z

‎Timeline

CCID-diane peters: /* Option to comply with later versions */

2014-10-03T18:47:59Z

‎Option to comply with later versions

CCID-diane peters: /* Policy decisions */

2014-10-03T18:42:08Z

‎Policy decisions

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *CC published a [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/ShareAlike_compatibility_analysis:_FAL preliminary analysis] of the FAL on its wiki.
 *Public discussion period ran from 22 July to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2014-October/007628.html 4 October 2014].
-*Compatibility determination published on ______ and FAL 1.3 added to [https://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses the CC compatible license page]
+*Compatibility determination published on 21 October 2014 and FAL 1.3 added to [https://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses the CC compatible license page]
 ==License texts analyzed==
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 When someone adapts an FAL work and applies BY-SA 4.0, the the terms and conditions of the BY-SA 4.0 license apply to the entire work, including those elements originally licensed under the FAL. As in the BY-SA to FAL scenario, however, both authors must be attributed.<ref>The interpretation of the FAL steward on this issue was provided in this [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2014-September/007625.html email] during the compatibility process.</ref>
-For more information [LINK]
+For more information, see the compatibility-specific FAQs and explanatory information [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/ShareAlike_compatibility here].
 ==Gatekeeping determination==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 *The FAL was [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2014-July/007602.html formally proposed] by CC and Copyleft Attitude as a candidate for two-way compatibility on 22 July 2014.
 *CC published a [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/ShareAlike_compatibility_analysis:_FAL preliminary analysis] of the FAL on its wiki.
-*Public discussion period ran from 22 July to __ October 2014 [LINK TO CLOSING POST ON LICENSE-DEV].
+*Public discussion period ran from 22 July to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2014-October/007628.html 4 October 2014].
 *Compatibility determination published on ______ and FAL 1.3 added to [https://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses the CC compatible license page]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 When someone adapts a BY-SA work and applies the FAL to her contributions, both licenses apply and downstream users must comply with both. However, because of [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode#s2a5B Section 2(a)(5)(B)] of BY-SA 4.0, anyone who receives the adapted material downstream may satisfy the conditions of both BY-SA and FAL (i.e. attribution and ShareAlike) in the manner dictated by the FAL.
-When someone adapts an FAL work and applies BY-SA 4.0, the the terms and conditions of the BY-SA 4.0 license apply to the entire work, including those elements originally licensed under the FAL. As in the BY-SA to FAL scenario, however, both authors must be attributed.  [Diane note:  This needs a citation since it depends on the other steward's opinion -- insert a link to the email forwarded to license-dev from the FAL lawyer.]
+When someone adapts an FAL work and applies BY-SA 4.0, the the terms and conditions of the BY-SA 4.0 license apply to the entire work, including those elements originally licensed under the FAL. As in the BY-SA to FAL scenario, however, both authors must be attributed.<ref>The interpretation of the FAL steward on this issue was provided in this [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2014-September/007625.html email] during the compatibility process.</ref>
 For more information [LINK]
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 In 2008, Creative Commons published the [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_Attribution-ShareAlike_Intent CC Attribution-ShareAlike Statement of Intent], in which CC articulated its intentions as steward for the SA licenses.  In point 4 of the statement, CC commits that "any candidate for compatibility must also satisfy the definition of a Free Cultural License set out in the Definition of Free Cultural Works."  This criteria serves as the initial gatekeeping factor for all candidate licenses.
-The Free Art License 1.3 is [http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses#Free_Art_License listed as a Free Cultural License], as well as conforms to the [http://opendefinition.org/licenses/ Open Definition].
+The Free Art License 1.3 is [http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses#Free_Art_License listed as a Free Cultural License], and conforms to the [http://opendefinition.org/licenses/ Open Definition].
 ==Policy decisions==
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 BY-SA requires:
-[INSERT]
+#creator and attribution parties
 CC determined that the minor differences in attribution and marking requirements were not significant enough to disrupt licensor expectations or cause problems for licensees.
@@ Line 60: / Line 65: @@
 ==Related policy notes==
 Creative Commons consulted extensively with the steward of the Free Art License during the 4.0 versioning process, as well as throughout the compatibility process on the policy matters described above.  Especially where two-way compatibility is at issue, the opinions, interpretations, and support of the candidate steward are critical components of CC's analysis, as are the support and expectations of the community the steward serves.  The final determination and policy statements above reflect the best interpretations by both stewards of their respective licenses.

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 The FAL gives licensees the option to comply with a later version of the FAL, regardless of whether the work has been adapted. BY-SA, on the other hand, allows licensees to comply with the conditions of future versions of BY-SA, but only if that version was applied to an adaptation of the work. When a BY-SA work is adapted and the FAL is applied, licensees may attribute and ShareAlike according to the '''conditions''' of the FAL 1.3. The FAL provision giving the option to comply with later versions should not affect licensees' obligations vis-a-vis BY-SA 4.0 unless and until later versions of the FAL are deemed compatible to BY-SA 4.0.
-==Other process notes==
+==Related policy notes==
 Creative Commons consulted extensively with the steward of the Free Art License during the 4.0 versioning process, as well as throughout the compatibility process on the policy matters described above.  Especially where two-way compatibility is at issue, the opinions, interpretations, and support of the candidate steward are critical components of CC's analysis, as are the support and expectations of the community the steward serves.  The final determination and policy statements above reflect the best interpretations by both stewards of their respective licenses.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 3 October 2014
Line 59:		Line 59:

	==Other process notes==		==Other process notes==
−	Creative Commons consulted extensively with the steward of the Free Art License during the 4.0 versioning process as well as throughout the compatibility process on the policy matters described above. ~~Where~~ two-way compatibility is at ~~stake~~, the opinions, interpretations, and support of the candidate steward are critical to CC's analysis, as are the support and expectations of the community the steward serves. The final determination and policy statements above reflect the best interpretations by both stewards of their respective licenses.	+	Creative Commons consulted extensively with the steward of the Free Art License during the 4.0 versioning process, as well as throughout the compatibility process on the policy matters described above. Especially where two-way compatibility is at issue, the opinions, interpretations, and support of the candidate steward are critical components of CC's analysis, as are the support and expectations of the community the steward serves. The final determination and policy statements above reflect the best interpretations by both stewards of their respective licenses.

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 For more information [LINK]
-==Policy decisions and related determinations==
+==Gatekeeping determination==
-===CC Attribution-ShareAlike Statement of Intent===
+In 2008, Creative Commons published the [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_Attribution-ShareAlike_Intent CC Attribution-ShareAlike Statement of Intent], in which CC articulated its intentions as steward for the SA licenses.  In point 4 of the statement, CC commits that "any candidate for compatibility must also satisfy the definition of a Free Cultural License set out in the Definition of Free Cultural Works."  This criteria serves as the initial gatekeeping factor for all candidate licenses.
-In 2008, Creative Commons published the [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_Attribution-ShareAlike_Intent CC Attribution-ShareAlike Statement of Intent], setting out CC's intentions as steward for the SA licenses.  In point 4 of the statement, CC commits that "any candidate for compatibility must also satisfy the definition of a Free Cultural License set out in the Definition of Free Cultural Works."  This criteria serves as the initial gatekeeping factor for all candidate licenses.
+The Free Art License 1.3 is [http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses#Free_Art_License listed as a Free Cultural License], as well as conforms to the [http://opendefinition.org/licenses/ Open Definition].
 ===Attribution===

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *Compatibility determination published on ______ and FAL 1.3 added to [https://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses the CC compatible license page]
-==Official license texts==
+==License texts analyzed==
 *[http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License 1.3] (English)
 *[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode BY-SA 4.0] (English)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 3 October 2014
Line 57:		Line 57:
	===Option to comply with later versions===		===Option to comply with later versions===
	The FAL gives licensees the option to comply with a later version of the FAL, regardless of whether the work has been adapted. BY-SA, on the other hand, allows licensees to comply with the conditions of future versions of BY-SA, but only if that version was applied to an adaptation of the work. When a BY-SA work is adapted and the FAL is applied, licensees may attribute and ShareAlike according to the '''conditions''' of the FAL 1.3. The FAL provision giving the option to comply with later versions should not affect licensees' obligations vis-a-vis BY-SA 4.0 unless and until later versions of the FAL are deemed compatible to BY-SA 4.0.		The FAL gives licensees the option to comply with a later version of the FAL, regardless of whether the work has been adapted. BY-SA, on the other hand, allows licensees to comply with the conditions of future versions of BY-SA, but only if that version was applied to an adaptation of the work. When a BY-SA work is adapted and the FAL is applied, licensees may attribute and ShareAlike according to the '''conditions''' of the FAL 1.3. The FAL provision giving the option to comply with later versions should not affect licensees' obligations vis-a-vis BY-SA 4.0 unless and until later versions of the FAL are deemed compatible to BY-SA 4.0.
		+
		+	==Other process notes==
		+	Creative Commons consulted extensively with the steward of the Free Art License during the 4.0 versioning process as well as throughout the compatibility process on the policy matters described above. Where two-way compatibility is at stake, the opinions, interpretations, and support of the candidate steward are critical to CC's analysis, as are the support and expectations of the community the steward serves. The final determination and policy statements above reflect the best interpretations by both stewards of their respective licenses.