Open Policy - Revision history

CCID-tvol at 23:52, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T23:52:49Z

CCID-tvol at 23:50, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T23:50:53Z

CCID-tvol at 23:49, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T23:49:22Z

CCID-tvol: creating portal page

2015-03-02T23:41:14Z

creating portal page

New page

This is a placeholder page for open policy text and resources.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
-== Open Policy Rationale for US Federal Government ==
+== Open Policy Rationale for U.S. Federal Government ==
 '''What is Open Policy?'''
@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 The fundamental principle that the public should have access to materials it funds has already been validated and embraced through initiatives such as the National Institute of Health’s [http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ Public Access Policy], where the final peer reviewed journal manuscripts resulting from NIH funding (~$30 billion annually) must be deposited in a publicly accessible digital archive within 12 months of publication so that anyone can access them. Similarly, the White House [http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf issued a Directive] supporting public access to publicly-funded research and data where Federal agencies with more than $100M in R&D expenditures must develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 '''What is Open Policy?'''
 Open Policy is the simple idea that publicly funded resources are openly licensed resources. The public should have access to what it paid for, and should not be required to pay twice (or more) to access and use federally funded education resources, research materials, or data. Today the public pays for the development of these resources first through their tax dollars, and then again to access the same federally funded materials such as textbooks, scientific journal articles, or data sets.
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
 '''Why is open licensing important?'''
 While U.S. Federal Agencies typically retain a nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use their grant-funded project materials for government purposes, Departments rarely exercise that license to provide the public free and legal access to those publicly funded resources. The adoption of Creative Commons licensing clarifies to the public how they may access, use, and adapt publicly funded resources.
@@ Line 24: / Line 26: @@
 '''Open licensing precedents at U.S. Federal level'''
 There are several existing initiatives at the U.S. Federal level that have adopted open licensing for publicly funded materials. These include:
 * Department of Labor:
@@ Line 40: / Line 43: @@
 '''Related initiatives'''
 The fundamental principle that the public should have access to materials it funds has already been validated and embraced through initiatives such as the National Institute of Health’s [http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ Public Access Policy], where the final peer reviewed journal manuscripts resulting from NIH funding (~$30 billion annually) must be deposited in a publicly accessible digital archive within 12 months of publication so that anyone can access them. Similarly, the White House [http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf issued a Directive] supporting public access to publicly-funded research and data where Federal agencies with more than $100M in R&D expenditures must develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 2 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is a placeholder page for open policy text and resources.		This is a placeholder page for open policy text and resources.
		+
		+
		+	== Open Policy Rationale for US Federal Government ==
		+
		+	'''What is Open Policy?'''
		+	Open Policy is the simple idea that publicly funded resources are openly licensed resources. The public should have access to what it paid for, and should not be required to pay twice (or more) to access and use federally funded education resources, research materials, or data. Today the public pays for the development of these resources first through their tax dollars, and then again to access the same federally funded materials such as textbooks, scientific journal articles, or data sets.
		+
		+	Open Policy is made possible through the funder’s use of open licenses, whereby the acceptance of public funds requires grantees to share content developed with those funds broadly under an open license, such as the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license] for content and the [https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ CC0 Public Domain dedication] for data.
		+
		+	'''Why is open licensing important?'''
		+	While U.S. Federal Agencies typically retain a nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use their grant-funded project materials for government purposes, Departments rarely exercise that license to provide the public free and legal access to those publicly funded resources. The adoption of Creative Commons licensing clarifies to the public how they may access, use, and adapt publicly funded resources.
		+
		+	There are multiple benefits of requiring open licenses on publicly funded resources:
		+	* Government increases the impact, reach and scalability of its grants,
		+	* Government is more efficient and a better steward of public funds,
		+	* Public has access to the education, research and data resources it funded,
		+	* Innovative and entrepreneurial uses of openly licensed materials are enabled,
		+	* Resources are available for reuse and value-add by anyone, including individual citizens, educators, scientists, public sector employees, entrepreneurs, and commercial businesses.
		+
		+	Creative Commons licenses are public copyright licenses that grant permission to the public to reproduce, distribute, perform, display or adapt the licensed materials for any purpose, and typically contain a minimal set of conditions, such as the requirement that a user provide attribution to the author. Creative Commons licenses are built on top of and encourage respect for copyright and copyright holders. Open policies leveraging open licenses allow creators to retain copyright, the government to retain its nonexclusive, irrevocable license, and provide the public with free, legal access to publicly funded resources.
		+
		+	Creative Commons licenses are the global standard for open content licensing. There are over [https://stateof.creativecommons.org/ 880 million CC-licensed objects] available on the web. CC licenses have been adopted globally by governments and public sector bodies, scientific publishers, and cultural heritage institutions such as national museums and libraries. CC licenses are the legal standard for collaboration on the web, used by businesses like Microsoft to communities like Wikipedia to philanthropy like the Ford Foundation.
		+
		+	'''Open licensing precedents at U.S. Federal level'''
		+	There are several existing initiatives at the U.S. Federal level that have adopted open licensing for publicly funded materials. These include:
		+	* Department of Labor:
		+	** [http://www.doleta.gov/grants/pdf/SGA-DFA-PY-13-10.pdf Trade Adjustment Assistance College and Career Training Grant Program]
		+	** [http://www.doleta.gov/grants/pdf/SGA-DFA-PY-10-06.pdf Career Pathways Innovation Fund Grant Program]
		+	** [http://www.doleta.gov/grants/pdf/SGA_DFA_PY_13_07.pdf H-1B Ready to Work Partnership grant program]
		+
		+	* Department of Education:
		+	** [https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/05/16/2014-11463/applications-for-new-awards-first-in-the-world-program-development-grants First in the World Program-Development Grants]
		+
		+	* Project Open Data
		+	** [https://project-open-data.cio.gov/license-examples/ usable examples of open licenses for potential use by agencies]
		+
		+	* Data.gov
		+	** [http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/climate-data-online-cdo http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/climate-data-online-cdo]
		+
		+	'''Related initiatives'''
		+	The fundamental principle that the public should have access to materials it funds has already been validated and embraced through initiatives such as the National Institute of Health’s [http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ Public Access Policy], where the final peer reviewed journal manuscripts resulting from NIH funding (~$30 billion annually) must be deposited in a publicly accessible digital archive within 12 months of publication so that anyone can access them. Similarly, the White House [http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf issued a Directive] supporting public access to publicly-funded research and data where Federal agencies with more than $100M in R&D expenditures must develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication.