Legal Concepts - Revision history

CCID-marimoreshead at 18:46, 12 January 2017

2017-01-12T18:46:08Z

Mike Linksvayer: Reverted edits by CCeditman (talk) to last revision by CCmatt

2013-09-15T20:35:10Z

Reverted edits by CCeditman (talk) to last revision by CCmatt

CCeditman: /* The Public Domain */

2013-06-08T21:33:14Z

‎The Public Domain

CCeditman: /* The Public Domain */

2013-06-08T21:32:36Z

‎The Public Domain

CCmatt: /* The Public Domain */

2013-05-10T13:27:35Z

‎The Public Domain

Guaka: Reverted edits by Nextlevel (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

2013-05-08T00:42:35Z

Reverted edits by Nextlevel (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

Nextlevel: /* Legal Concepts From Law Firms */

2013-04-10T15:06:27Z

‎Legal Concepts From Law Firms

Nextlevel: /* Legal Concepts From Law Firms */

2013-04-10T14:57:04Z

‎Legal Concepts From Law Firms

Nextlevel: /* Legal Concepts From Law Firms */

2013-03-31T22:42:47Z

‎Legal Concepts From Law Firms

Nextlevel: /* Legal Concepts From Law Firms */

2013-03-27T00:11:49Z

‎Legal Concepts From Law Firms

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 12 January 2017
Line 66:		Line 66:

	*[http://artlibre.org/licence/lalgb.html Free Art License]		*[http://artlibre.org/licence/lalgb.html Free Art License]
−
−	*[http://www.fmpl.org/ Free Music Public License]

	*[http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml Open Content License]		*[http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml Open Content License]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Creativity and innovation rely on a rich heritage of prior intellectual endeavor. We stand on the shoulders of giants by revisiting, reusing, and transforming the ideas and works of our peers and predecessors. Digital communications promise a new explosion of this kind of collaborative creative activity. But at the same time, expanding intellectual property protection leaves fewer and fewer creative works in the “public domain” — the body of creative material unfettered by law and, to quote Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, “free as the air to common use.”
-Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their[http://www.teamlaw.com legal] rights. It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
+Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their legal rights[http://www.teamlaw.com .] It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
 ===Background on and examples of the value of the public domain===

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Creativity and innovation rely on a rich heritage of prior intellectual endeavor. We stand on the shoulders of giants by revisiting, reusing, and transforming the ideas and works of our peers and predecessors. Digital communications promise a new explosion of this kind of collaborative creative activity. But at the same time, expanding intellectual property protection leaves fewer and fewer creative works in the “public domain” — the body of creative material unfettered by law and, to quote Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, “free as the air to common use.”
-Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their[http:www.teamlaw.com legal] rights. It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
+Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their[http://www.teamlaw.com legal] rights. It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
 ===Background on and examples of the value of the public domain===

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Creativity and innovation rely on a rich heritage of prior intellectual endeavor. We stand on the shoulders of giants by revisiting, reusing, and transforming the ideas and works of our peers and predecessors. Digital communications promise a new explosion of this kind of collaborative creative activity. But at the same time, expanding intellectual property protection leaves fewer and fewer creative works in the “public domain” — the body of creative material unfettered by law and, to quote Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, “free as the air to common use.”
-Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their legal rights[http://www.teamlaw.com .] It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
+Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their[http:www.teamlaw.com legal] rights. It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
 ===Background on and examples of the value of the public domain===

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Creativity and innovation rely on a rich heritage of prior intellectual endeavor. We stand on the shoulders of giants by revisiting, reusing, and transforming the ideas and works of our peers and predecessors. Digital communications promise a new explosion of this kind of collaborative creative activity. But at the same time, expanding intellectual property protection leaves fewer and fewer creative works in the “public domain” — the body of creative material unfettered by law and, to quote Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, “free as the air to common use.”
-Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their legal rights. It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
+Until 1976, creative works were not protected by U.S. copyright law unless their authors took the trouble to publish a copyright notice along with them. Works not affixed with a notice passed into the public domain. Following legislative changes in 1976 and 1988, creative works are now automatically copyrighted. We believe that many people would not choose this “copyright by default” if they had an easy mechanism for turning their work over to the public or exercising some but not all of their legal rights[http://www.teamlaw.com .] It is Creative Commons’ goal to help create such a mechanism.
 ===Background on and examples of the value of the public domain===

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 8 May 2013
Line 89:		Line 89:

	*[http://www.tsc.org/ The Software Conservancy]		*[http://www.tsc.org/ The Software Conservancy]
−
−	~~===Legal Concepts From Law Firms===~~
−
−	*[http://www.cprlaw.com Cohen Placitella Roth]
−
−	*[http://www.teamlaw.com Team Law]
−
−	*[http://philadelphiacourtreporting.com Court System]
−
−	*[http://courtreportingagency.com Court System]
−
−	*[http://www.goldsteinbachman.com Goldstein Bachman]
−
−	*[http://www.begelmanorlow.com Begelman Orlow & Melletz]
−
−	*[http://www.debtfreefrombankruptcy.com McDowell Postenock]
−
−	*[http://www.mrpattorneys.com McDowell]
−
−	*[http://www.njfop.org NJ FOP]
−
−	*[http://www.sugarmanlawfirm.com Barry Sugarman]
−
−	*[http://www.seikalystewart.com Jeff Stewart]
−
−	*[http://www.losangelescourtreporting.com Courts]
−
−	*[http://www.tomeslaw.com Frances Tomes]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 10 April 2013
Line 115:		Line 115:

	*[http://www.losangelescourtreporting.com Courts]		*[http://www.losangelescourtreporting.com Courts]
		+
		+	*[http://www.tomeslaw.com Frances Tomes]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 10 April 2013
Line 111:		Line 111:

	*[http://www.sugarmanlawfirm.com Barry Sugarman]		*[http://www.sugarmanlawfirm.com Barry Sugarman]
		+
		+	*[http://www.seikalystewart.com Jeff Stewart]
		+
		+	*[http://www.losangelescourtreporting.com Courts]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 31 March 2013
Line 109:		Line 109:

	*[http://www.njfop.org NJ FOP]		*[http://www.njfop.org NJ FOP]
		+
		+	*[http://www.sugarmanlawfirm.com Barry Sugarman]

@@ Line 95: / Line 95: @@
 *[http://www.teamlaw.com Team Law]
 *[http://courtreportingagency.com Court System]
@@ Line 103: / Line 105: @@
 *[http://www.debtfreefrombankruptcy.com McDowell Postenock]
 *[http://www.njfop.org NJ FOP]