Case Studies/GateHouse Media - Revision history

U.S. Curator: add category

2011-09-06T14:32:41Z

add category

Akozak at 19:54, 9 September 2010

2010-09-09T19:54:34Z

Akozak: moved Case Studies/GATEHOUSE MEDIA: CREATIVE COMMONS CREATES COMMUNITY to Case Studies/GateHouse Media

2010-08-31T21:31:34Z

moved Case Studies/GATEHOUSE MEDIA: CREATIVE COMMONS CREATES COMMUNITY to Case Studies/GateHouse Media

Akozak at 21:31, 31 August 2010

2010-08-31T21:31:18Z

Akozak at 21:31, 31 August 2010

2010-08-31T21:31:03Z

CCID-jane at 18:08, 31 August 2010

2010-08-31T18:08:36Z

Akozak at 17:49, 30 August 2010

2010-08-30T17:49:46Z

Jacinta Roberts at 12:05, 19 March 2010

2010-03-19T12:05:32Z

Jacinta Roberts at 12:03, 19 March 2010

2010-03-19T12:03:23Z

Jacinta Roberts at 12:02, 19 March 2010

2010-03-19T12:02:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 6 September 2011
Line 60:		Line 60:

	<i>"I've been geeked out about CC for a while because it is so perfect for the digital media age, an era where there is true economic value in sharing. In fact, in the present era, failure to share is detrimental to a publisher," - Howard Owen - Director of Digital Publishing for GateHouse.</i>		<i>"I've been geeked out about CC for a while because it is so perfect for the digital media age, an era where there is true economic value in sharing. In fact, in the present era, failure to share is detrimental to a publisher," - Howard Owen - Director of Digital Publishing for GateHouse.</i>
		+
		+	[[Category:USA]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
 |Description=GateHouse Media is a newspaper conglomerate that owns 75 daily and 231 weekly newspapers across America.  It is the largest local media company in America.  In December 2006, they rolled Creative Commons licensing across 96 (http://www.wickedlocal.com/) sites with the sole purpose of switching copyright licensing to Creative Commons licensing.  Their intention was to encompass most of the 121 daily and weekly newspapers both online and in print in Massachusetts, with Creative Commons Licenses.
 |Mainurl=http://www.gatehousemedia.com/
 |Author=Jacinta Roberts
 |User_Status=Creator
 |Format=Other
-|Country=United States of America
+|Country=United States
 |Quote=For Newspapers to give up Copyright is a remarkable step.
 |Quote_Attribution=Dan Kennedy, Northeastern University
 |License=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
-|importance=Medium
+|importance=High
 |quality=B-Class
 |Description=GateHouse Media is a newspaper conglomerate that owns 75 daily and 231 weekly newspapers across America.  It is the largest local media company in America.  In December 2006, they rolled Creative Commons licensing across 96 (http://www.wickedlocal.com/) sites with the sole purpose of switching copyright licensing to Creative Commons licensing.  Their intention was to encompass most of the 121 daily and weekly newspapers both online and in print in Massachusetts, with Creative Commons Licenses.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
-|importance=High
+|importance=Medium
 |Description=GateHouse Media is a newspaper conglomerate that owns 75 daily and 231 weekly newspapers across America.  It is the largest local media company in America.  In December 2006, they rolled Creative Commons licensing across 96 (http://www.wickedlocal.com/) sites with the sole purpose of switching copyright licensing to Creative Commons licensing.  Their intention was to encompass most of the 121 daily and weekly newspapers both online and in print in Massachusetts, with Creative Commons Licenses.
 |Mainurl=http://www.gatehousemedia.com/

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
 |Description=GateHouse Media is a newspaper conglomerate that owns 75 daily and 231 weekly newspapers across America.  It is the largest local media company in America.  In December 2006, they rolled Creative Commons licensing across 96 (http://www.wickedlocal.com/) sites with the sole purpose of switching copyright licensing to Creative Commons licensing.  Their intention was to encompass most of the 121 daily and weekly newspapers both online and in print in Massachusetts, with Creative Commons Licenses.
 |Mainurl=http://www.gatehousemedia.com/
 |Author=Jacinta Roberts
 |User_Status=Creator
-|License short name=CC BY-NC-ND
+|License_short_name=CC BY-NC-ND
 |Format=Other
 |Country=United States of America

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:31, 31 August 2010
(No difference)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 |Country=Across Massachusetts with plans of expansion throughout other states in America.
 }}
-DESCRIPTION:
+<b>DESCRIPTION</b>
 GateHouse Media is a newspaper conglomerate that owns 75 daily and 231 weekly newspapers across America.  It is the largest local media company in America.  In December 2006, they rolled Creative Commons licensing across 96 (http://www.wickedlocal.com/) sites with the sole purpose of switching copyright licensing to Creative Commons licensing.  Their intention was to encompass most of the 121 daily and weekly newspapers both online and in print in Massachusetts, with Creative Commons Licenses.
-OVERVIEW:
+<b>OVERVIEW</b>
-“We operate in what is sometimes referred to as the ‘hyper-local’ or local community market within the media industry.  Media companies that serve this segment provide highly focused local content and advertising that is generally unique to each market they serve.” – GateHouse Media’s prospectus 2006.
+<i>“We operate in what is sometimes referred to as the ‘hyper-local’ or local community market within the media industry.  Media companies that serve this segment provide highly focused local content and advertising that is generally unique to each market they serve.” – GateHouse Media’s prospectus 2006.</i>
 GateHouse Media represents itself as a company for local community papers.  They boast of providing superior coverage, which has allowed them to reach 10 million readers nationally, all by being not only local but ‘hyper’ local.
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Their business model is to be the preeminent provider of local content and advertising.  They promise to ensure higher levels of exposure for local advertisers towards targeted markets.  Research has shown that the delivery of advertising in this way has proven to be beneficial.  Personalising the news for local communities has given it more meaning and has not only captured the attention and interests of the community, but raised advertising revenue exponentially.
-LICENCE USAGE:
+<b>LICENCE USAGE</b>
 GateHouse Media have used an Attribution Noncommercial No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported licence.
-“GateHouse Media are using the most restrictive of the Creative Commons licenses”.
+<i>“GateHouse Media are using the most restrictive of the Creative Commons licenses”. - Charlene Li, VP and Principal Analyst at Forrester Research.</i>
 The Creative Commons license, Attribution Noncommercial No Derivative Works, is the most restrictive licence of the six available options.  Creative Commons note -
-This license is the most restrictive of our six main licenses, allowing redistribution. This license is often called the “free advertising” license because it allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to you, but they can’t change them in any way or use them commercially.
+<i>This license is the most restrictive of our six main licenses, allowing redistribution. This license is often called the “free advertising” license because it allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to you, but they can’t change them in any way or use them commercially.</i>
 This kind of license seems a clever ploy by GateHouse Media.  Howard Owens, Director of digital publishing for GateHouse explains -
-"It's really not a big change from how a lot of newspaper sites handle content -- free non-commercial use, but generally only if you ask.  This licensing removes the middle man of asking, because now it's explicitly stated that free non-commercial use is permitted. It's also a way to draw attention to: feel free to redistribute our content in non-commercial ways, please just be sure to link back to the originating site."
+<i>"It's really not a big change from how a lot of newspaper sites handle content -- free non-commercial use, but generally only if you ask.  This licensing removes the middle man of asking, because now it's explicitly stated that free non-commercial use is permitted. It's also a way to draw attention to: feel free to redistribute our content in non-commercial ways, please just be sure to link back to the originating site."</i>
-MOTIVATIONS:
+<b>MOTIVATIONS</b>
 Analysis of GateHouse Media’s decision to CC license its Wickedlocal.com and Townonline.com sites, has seen speculation that it is a response to the cut-and-paste world of weblogs, where news is quite often quoted and pages linked back to the original source of information.   Creative Commons Licensing in this circumstance has meant that this kind of behaviour is legal, as long as bloggers attribute and link their work back to the original article.
-“For a major publisher with significant numbers of people reading to be doing this is great.”
+<i>“For a major publisher with significant numbers of people reading to be doing this is great.” - Mia Garlick, former chief council of the Creative Commons Foundation.</i>
 Major advantages can be found when using Creative Commons Licensing.  The ability to, look, like, copy, comment and link to original, has seen greater numbers of visitors to originating sites.   This increased traffic flow will draw advertisers to Creative Commons Licensed sites as the more visitors there are, the more revenue is to be found.
 When implementing the Creative Commons License, GateHouse Media had a main objective, to move the local newspaper sites firmly into the “two=way” web and point them into the direction of greater openness.
@@ Line 53: / Line 52: @@
 To open up the site to user-submitted content, GateHouse Media used open-source web framework Zope as the backbone for the TownOnline operations.  The move from commercial software to open source software, had many advantages.
-Going to open source has obvious “the price is right” advantages, but may also confer stability: small software companies fail at rates comparable to restaurants, a famously tough business.  Such business failures leave a software company’s customers stranded on a platform that won’t be updated as time goes on, and which they can’t update themselves, since they don’t have access to the source code.  Sharing content, letting non-professionals submit content, and connecting with a global network of open-source tinkerers reveal a picture of a firm that’s open to the wide world of the web. That doesn’t sound like your average media company, whose value is based on control of unique content, content whose value is boosted by exclusivity, not by contributions from Just Anybody. But instead of plugging leaks, GateHouse has taken out a Creative Commons can opener and put a hole the size of the Internet in the side of Battleship Content.
+<i>Going to open source has obvious “the price is right” advantages, but may also confer stability: small software companies fail at rates comparable to restaurants, a famously tough business.  Such business failures leave a software company’s customers stranded on a platform that won’t be updated as time goes on, and which they can’t update themselves, since they don’t have access to the source code.  Sharing content, letting non-professionals submit content, and connecting with a global network of open-source tinkerers reveal a picture of a firm that’s open to the wide world of the web. That doesn’t sound like your average media company, whose value is based on control of unique content, content whose value is boosted by exclusivity, not by contributions from Just Anybody. But instead of plugging leaks, GateHouse has taken out a Creative Commons can opener and put a hole the size of the Internet in the side of Battleship Content. - Lisa Williams. </i>
-CONCLUSION:
+<b>CONCLUSION</b>
 Many argue that although strict, the Creative Commons licence remains a beneficial and exciting move.
@@ Line 62: / Line 60: @@
 It seems that many news publishing companies are starting to note the benefits of a Creative Commons License.  It is hoped that these benefits will soon be realised and implemented in Australia’s news publishing environment.
-"I've been geeked out about CC for a while because it is so perfect for the digital media age, an era where there is true economic value in sharing. In fact, in the present era, failure to share is detrimental to a publisher,"
+<i>"I've been geeked out about CC for a while because it is so perfect for the digital media age, an era where there is true economic value in sharing. In fact, in the present era, failure to share is detrimental to a publisher," - Howard Owen - Director of Digital Publishing for GateHouse.</i>