Case Studies/Evaluation - Revision history

Mike Linksvayer: note inspiration

2011-06-17T18:28:14Z

note inspiration

2011-04-28T01:19:05Z

2011-04-28T00:34:46Z

2011-04-28T00:25:27Z

2010-09-13T22:11:35Z

2010-09-08T19:39:06Z

‎Importance as a Case Study

2010-09-08T19:37:17Z

‎Importance as a Case Study

2010-09-07T21:08:26Z

‎Importance as a Case Study

2010-09-07T21:07:27Z

‎Importance as a Case Study

2010-09-07T21:06:31Z

‎Importance as a Case Study

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 17 June 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	See the [[#Needs_Evaluation\|Needs Evaluation]] section to see how you can help evaluate Case Studies, or the [[#Evaluation_Guide\|Evaluation Guide]] section for information on how to help improve the Case Studies.		See the [[#Needs_Evaluation\|Needs Evaluation]] section to see how you can help evaluate Case Studies, or the [[#Evaluation_Guide\|Evaluation Guide]] section for information on how to help improve the Case Studies.
		+
		+	Note this scheme is inspired largely by [http://en.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Assessment_FAQ WikiProject article assessents on English Wikipedia].

	{{Evaluation Summary}}		{{Evaluation Summary}}

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 {{Translations
-| articles = Pt:Casos de Estudo/Pt:Avaliação
+| articles = Pt:Casos de Estudo/Avaliação
 }}

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 {{Translations
-| articles = Pt:Casos de Estudo/Avaliação
+| articles = Pt:Casos de Estudo/Pt:Avaliação
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 It's important for Creative Commons to be able to talk about the impact that our licenses have on the web. Part of this involves collecting use cases from different domains and aggregating some useful metrics. The Case Studies database aims to enable that in addition to providing a way for our community to search and discover interesting uses. But in order for a database like this to be useful, it has to have good solid information.
@@ Line 127: / Line 124: @@
 ===Only Needs Quality Evaluation===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Casestudy]][[Has review status::Needs quality evaluation]]|?Case study title|format=template|template=CS Eval NoUL|link=none|limit=100}}

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 {| cellpadding="7" class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
 ! style="width:10%;" |Class
-! style="width:35%;" |Criteria
+! style="width:35%;" |Description
 ! style="width:35%;" |Suggested Edits
 ! style="width:20%;" |Examples

@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
+|
 * The Case Study is from a region with few CC licensed works and/or is an early adopter for a specific region, culture, or language.
-* The Case study has developed a moderate community of users.
+* The Case Study has developed a moderate community of users.
+|
 {{#if: {{#ask: [[Category:Casestudy]][[Has importance::Medium]]|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask: [[Category:Casestudy]][[Has importance::Medium]]|?Case study title=|format=template|template=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|* No Case Studies have been marked as having Medium importance.}}
@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
 * For platforms or sites, the volume of work represented by the Case Study is low.
 * There are many CC use-cases or Case Studies similar to this Case Study.
-* The Case Study no longer exists.
+* The Case Study no longer exists or has not been active in a while.
+|
 {{#if: {{#ask: [[Category:Casestudy]][[Has importance::Low]]|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask: [[Category:Casestudy]][[Has importance::Low]]|?Case study title=|format=template|template=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|* No Case Studies have been marked as having Low importance.}}