Case Studies/Cleanup - Revision history

Michelle Thorne: updating Case Studies URL

2009-05-05T10:03:22Z

updating Case Studies URL

2009-05-05T09:55:11Z

updating Case Studies URL

2009-05-05T09:53:47Z

2009-04-15T09:45:55Z

‎Case Study Form

2009-04-15T09:26:32Z

‎Landing Page

2009-04-15T09:25:49Z

‎Landing Page

2009-04-15T09:22:22Z

‎Landing Page

2009-04-15T09:21:43Z

‎Landing Page

2009-04-15T09:19:24Z

‎Case Study Main Body

2009-04-15T09:16:24Z

‎Case Study Form

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 === Duplicate Wiki pages===
-Adding a Case Study for a project that already has an entry in the wiki is problematic (see: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Valkaama) These are entries from Content Directories. Maybe case studies should have the folder /casestudies before them?
+Adding a Case Study for a project that already has an entry in the wiki is problematic (see: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Valkaama) These are entries from Content Directories. Maybe case studies should have the folder /Case_Studies before them?
 ** Meta: Ask Mike. Moving content and/or setting up redirects affects content.
 * Brings up an interesting point: we could have the Content Directory form autofill based on the case study form. No need to duplicate some of this info, right?

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * Brings up an interesting point: we could have the Content Directory form autofill based on the case study form. No need to duplicate some of this info, right?
 ===Show Preview===
-<strike>This function is buggy for me. After pressing Preview, I see multiple boxes like this: "Facts about Casestudies/Cleanup RDF feed Revision time 	23 March 2009 15:33  + Revision user 	Michelle Thorne  +"</strike>
+<strike>This function is buggy for me. After pressing Preview, I see multiple boxes like this: "Facts about Case_Studies/Cleanup RDF feed Revision time 	23 March 2009 15:33  + Revision user 	Michelle Thorne  +"</strike>
 * Tech: known bug. NK has ticket for. http://code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue110
@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 Can this pull or link to example/featured cases from each category? Might catch eyes better.</strike>
-Back to [[Casestudies/Roadmap]]
+Back to [[Case_Studies/Roadmap]]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ===Images===
 Have link to CC wiki's "Upload File"? Or other way to integrate file upload within form.
 ** Tech: possible. Just copy the link Special Page>>Upload File.
 ===Author/Organisation===
 Is slightly confusing. Does it mean the author of the case study? Or the author of the content?

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 == Landing Page ==
 See mock-up: [[User:Michelle_Thorne/DevCasestudies]]
 <strike>* Meta: work with Greg to redesign. lots of mediawiki tweaking.
 ** What kinds of changes are you thinking of? [[User:Greg.grossmeier|greg.grossmeier]] 20:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 == Landing Page ==
-* Meta: work with Greg to redesign. lots of mediawiki tweaking.
+See mock-up: [[User:Michelle_Thorne/DevCasestudies]]
 ** What kinds of changes are you thinking of? [[User:Greg.grossmeier|greg.grossmeier]] 20:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
-** See mock-up: [[User:Michelle_Thorne/DevCasestudies]]
 === CCau Book Design===
 The book jacket cover should be prominent and link to the whole PDF or new booklets. @Jess any further design elements we can include from the book?
@@ Line 80: / Line 81: @@
 * Tech: possible. May also involve overriding CSS stylesheets.
 ===View Case Studies Box===
-Can this pull or link to example/featured cases from each category? Might catch eyes better.
+Can this pull or link to example/featured cases from each category? Might catch eyes better.</strike>
 Back to [[Casestudies/Roadmap]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:53, 5 May 2009
(No difference)

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 It may not be worth it?? [[User:Nkinkade|nkinkade]] 19:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
-Ok, good to know. I think this boils down to a question of benefit vs. time required to install it. I'm not sure how much work is needed to set up the extension, but I won't call this a high priority bug. So, if it's too intensive, we should just leave it out. --[[User:Michelle Thorne|Michelle Thorne]] 16:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
+Another, less tech-inclined user just made this same suggestion again. Maybe we should reconsider installing the extension? I think it would overall help the formatting quality of the studies, and elsewhere on the wiki. --[[User:Michelle Thorne|Michelle Thorne]] 09:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 ===Media===