Case Studies/Association for Progressive Communications Australia - Revision history

CCID-jane at 20:01, 3 September 2010

2010-09-03T20:01:16Z

CCID-jane at 20:00, 3 September 2010

2010-09-03T20:00:55Z

Agarton: /* License Usage */

2010-08-26T12:51:10Z

‎License Usage

Move page script: moved Association for Progressive Communications Australia to Case Studies/Association for Progressive Communications Australia

2009-09-18T18:55:14Z

moved Association for Progressive Communications Australia to Case Studies/Association for Progressive Communications Australia

Rachel cobcroft at 08:04, 21 June 2008

2008-06-21T08:04:54Z

Grant.mcherron: Final tweak to the

2008-06-20T08:19:25Z

Final tweak to the

Grant.mcherron: Reduced the size of the

2008-06-20T08:16:29Z

Reduced the size of the

Grant.mcherron: Removed the Media section

2008-06-20T08:14:16Z

Removed the Media section

Grant.mcherron: /* Media */ Removed the link to the DFD 08 pamphlet

2008-06-20T08:13:21Z

‎Media: Removed the link to the DFD 08 pamphlet

Grant.mcherron: /* Motivations */ Added bold to "apc" text and changed Grant's title

2008-06-20T08:11:05Z

‎Motivations: Added bold to "apc" text and changed Grant's title

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
 |importance=High
-|quality=A-Class
+|quality=B-Class
 |Description='''apc'''.au, a digital media communications organisation advocating for open content and flexible licensing models, is engaged in both the development of and sustainable access to community-owned information communication technologies and infrastructure.
 |Quote='''apc'''.au advocates for and employs open licenses such as GNU and Creative Commons, as tools that provide a legal framework that would ensure ownership of cultural and intellectual property remains within the public domain and for the public good.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
 |Description='''apc'''.au, a digital media communications organisation advocating for open content and flexible licensing models, is engaged in both the development of and sustainable access to community-owned information communication technologies and infrastructure.
 |Quote='''apc'''.au advocates for and employs open licenses such as GNU and Creative Commons, as tools that provide a legal framework that would ensure ownership of cultural and intellectual property remains within the public domain and for the public good.
@@ Line 8: / Line 10: @@
 |User_Status=Creator
 |Tag=open access, community, development, ICTs, democracy, participation
-|License short name=CC BY-NC-ND, CC BY-NC-SA
+|License_short_name=CC BY-NC-ND, CC BY-NC-SA
 |License=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/au/, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/au/
 |Format=Image, Sound, Text, MovingImage

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 Further examples of '''apc'''.au’s current projects employing Creative Commons include:
 *[http://wiki.apc.org.au/index.php?title=Home_Lands Home Lands]: Connecting young refugees to their homelands and separated communities via online media and Creative Commons rights management in association with the Cultural Development Network, the Home Lands Reference Committee, and with support from the City of Melbourne;
 *[http://openchannel.org.au/blogs/videoslam/ Video Slam]: Rights and production management workshops that encourage cross-discipline collaboration in the use of flexible licenses. This results in the production of new works that put Creative Commons licenses into direct contact with screen practitioners. Video Slam explores whether these licences can be used to create new works from Share Alike content and whether there is enough material in the public domain to produce works that are both meaningful and watchable.
 Detailed information on the projects '''apc'''.au undertakes can be found on their [http://wiki.apc.org.au wiki].  In addition to their projects, '''apc'''.au is working to establish an open business model that provides operational transparency, effectively applying the open and flexible concept to the company itself.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 21 June 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:

	:These tools apply a sense of collective ownership and that which strives for the common good, that stimulates innovation and the transformation of unsustainable practices without the burden of patents. '''apc'''.au, through its various projects, from broadcast spectrum policy to public performance, from online media advisory to research in collective music making, we seek a more liberal, sustainable society that respects, protects and enhances both bio and cultural diversity and is nourished by it.’		:These tools apply a sense of collective ownership and that which strives for the common good, that stimulates innovation and the transformation of unsustainable practices without the burden of patents. '''apc'''.au, through its various projects, from broadcast spectrum policy to public performance, from online media advisory to research in collective music making, we seek a more liberal, sustainable society that respects, protects and enhances both bio and cultural diversity and is nourished by it.’
		+	== Media ==
		+
		+	Delete this line and add text here.
		+
		+	Add media that is relevant.
		+
		+	{{Incomplete\|Media\|formedit}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Case Study
-|Description='''apc'''.au is a digital media communications organisation advocating for open content and flexible licensing models, engaged in both the development of and sustainable access to community-owned information communication technologies and infrastructure.
+|Description='''apc'''.au, a digital media communications organisation advocating for open content and flexible licensing models, is engaged in both the development of and sustainable access to community-owned information communication technologies and infrastructure.
 |Quote='''apc'''.au advocates for and employs open licenses such as GNU and Creative Commons, as tools that provide a legal framework that would ensure ownership of cultural and intellectual property remains within the public domain and for the public good.
 |Quote_Attribution=Grant McHerron, Program Manager - Technical, apc.au

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:55, 18 September 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 20 June 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:

	:These tools apply a sense of collective ownership and that which strives for the common good, that stimulates innovation and the transformation of unsustainable practices without the burden of patents. '''apc'''.au, through its various projects, from broadcast spectrum policy to public performance, from online media advisory to research in collective music making, we seek a more liberal, sustainable society that respects, protects and enhances both bio and cultural diversity and is nourished by it.’		:These tools apply a sense of collective ownership and that which strives for the common good, that stimulates innovation and the transformation of unsustainable practices without the burden of patents. '''apc'''.au, through its various projects, from broadcast spectrum policy to public performance, from online media advisory to research in collective music making, we seek a more liberal, sustainable society that respects, protects and enhances both bio and cultural diversity and is nourished by it.’
−
−	~~== Media ==~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 20 June 2008
Line 66:		Line 66:

	== Media ==		== Media ==
−	~~http://www.documentfreedom.org/images/a/a3/Dfd_leaflet_back.png~~

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 == Motivations ==
-apc.au advocates for and employs open licenses such as GNU and Creative Commons as tools that provide a legal framework to ensure that ownership of cultural and intellectual property remains within the public domain and for the public good.
+'''apc'''.au advocates for and employs open licenses such as GNU and Creative Commons as tools that provide a legal framework to ensure that ownership of cultural and intellectual property remains within the public domain and for the public good.
-In an email interview with Grant McHerron, Technical Director of apc.au, with Rachel Cobcroft from Creative Commons Australia in May 2008, he expressed the following opinion:
+In an email interview with Grant McHerron, Program Manager - Technical of '''apc'''.au, with Rachel Cobcroft from Creative Commons Australia in May 2008, he expressed the following opinion:
 :‘Open models for licensing, for research and education, the arts and cultural practice, science and business... for everything that we make and the resources we rely on, are an imperative towards the need to move from the dire outcomes of opportunistic development and the mechanisms currently in place to protect them.
-:These tools apply a sense of collective ownership and that which strives for the common good, that stimulates innovation and the transformation of unsustainable practices without the burden of patents. apc.au, through its various projects, from broadcast spectrum policy to public performance, from online media advisory to  research in collective music making, we seek a more liberal, sustainable society that respects, protects and enhances both bio and cultural diversity and is nourished by it.’
+:These tools apply a sense of collective ownership and that which strives for the common good, that stimulates innovation and the transformation of unsustainable practices without the burden of patents. '''apc'''.au, through its various projects, from broadcast spectrum policy to public performance, from online media advisory to  research in collective music making, we seek a more liberal, sustainable society that respects, protects and enhances both bio and cultural diversity and is nourished by it.’
 == Media ==
 http://www.documentfreedom.org/images/a/a3/Dfd_leaflet_back.png