4.0/Games 3d printing and functional content - Revision history

Mike Linksvayer: Reverted edits by Alicia Terrysson (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

2013-01-22T22:12:18Z

Reverted edits by Alicia Terrysson (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

Alicia Terrysson: /* GPL compatibility */

2013-01-22T09:06:52Z

‎GPL compatibility

Alicia Terrysson: /* Source release? */

2013-01-22T09:02:43Z

‎Source release?

Mike Linksvayer: Reverted edits by LindaL (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

2012-12-13T09:57:22Z

Reverted edits by LindaL (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

LindaL: /* Background */

2012-12-13T09:40:27Z

‎Background

Mike Linksvayer: Reverted edits by LindaL (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

2012-12-10T17:46:57Z

Reverted edits by LindaL (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

LindaL: /* Source release? */

2012-12-10T15:10:29Z

‎Source release?

Mike Linksvayer: Reverted edits by DorisGreys (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

2012-11-28T07:40:21Z

Reverted edits by DorisGreys (talk) to last revision by Mike Linksvayer

DorisGreys: /* Background on separation of functional/software and cultural layers */

2012-11-28T07:21:04Z

‎Background on separation of functional/software and cultural layers

DorisGreys: /* Background on separation of functional/software and cultural layers */

2012-11-28T07:20:07Z

‎Background on separation of functional/software and cultural layers

@@ Line 207: / Line 207: @@
 that software should still not be released as BY-SA and that this is
 for avoiding conflicts in complicated areas of interwoven cultural and
-functional/software works [http://www.casinoluckywin.com/ online casino]
+functional/software works.
 The other possible downside is whether or not source requirements for
@@ Line 228: / Line 228: @@
 * In other words, just how far does "preferred form of the work for making modifications to it" go down?  What if people are remixing it on different layers, and the artists themselves prefer separate layers?  Does the GPL give flexibility here?
 There is additional discussion about GPL/CC compatibility [[4.0/ShareAlike#Considerations_regarding_compatibility_of_other_licenses| here]].
 == Scoping copyleft across and code ==
@@ Line 410: / Line 410: @@
 * This could mean plenty of works never released with sources before will suddenly become out of compliance
-* Unlike with software, where there's a clear binary of source or no source, in other forms of content it's often a gradient.  See Big Buck Bunny/Sita Sings the Blues examples described the GPL compatibility section of this document. [https://www.whiteknightcasino.com/games/slots.asp Best Online Slots]
+* Unlike with software, where there's a clear binary of source or no source, in other forms of content it's often a gradient.  See Big Buck Bunny/Sita Sings the Blues examples described the GPL compatibility section of this document.
 It's likely we can't or shouldn't make this a requirement for CC BY-SA

@@ Line 207: / Line 207: @@
 that software should still not be released as BY-SA and that this is
 for avoiding conflicts in complicated areas of interwoven cultural and
-functional/software works.
+functional/software works [http://www.casinoluckywin.com/ online casino]
 The other possible downside is whether or not source requirements for
@@ Line 228: / Line 228: @@
 * In other words, just how far does "preferred form of the work for making modifications to it" go down?  What if people are remixing it on different layers, and the artists themselves prefer separate layers?  Does the GPL give flexibility here?
 There is additional discussion about GPL/CC compatibility [[4.0/ShareAlike#Considerations_regarding_compatibility_of_other_licenses| here]].
 == Scoping copyleft across and code ==

@@ Line 410: / Line 410: @@
 * This could mean plenty of works never released with sources before will suddenly become out of compliance
-* Unlike with software, where there's a clear binary of source or no source, in other forms of content it's often a gradient.  See Big Buck Bunny/Sita Sings the Blues examples described the GPL compatibility section of this document.
+* Unlike with software, where there's a clear binary of source or no source, in other forms of content it's often a gradient.  See Big Buck Bunny/Sita Sings the Blues examples described the GPL compatibility section of this document. [https://www.whiteknightcasino.com/games/slots.asp Best Online Slots]
 It's likely we can't or shouldn't make this a requirement for CC BY-SA

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 either blurred or interwoven.  It's likely that as the spaces of free
 software and free culture (ideally) grow, we'll continue to see more
-and more examples of this overlap [http://www.telsgroup.com.de/services/groupage_cargo_transportation_services/ Spedition Sammelgut]
+and more examples of this overlap.
 Most of this wiki page will involve issues of the code/functional and

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 either blurred or interwoven.  It's likely that as the spaces of free
 software and free culture (ideally) grow, we'll continue to see more
-and more examples of this overlap.
+and more examples of this overlap [http://www.telsgroup.com.de/services/groupage_cargo_transportation_services/ Spedition Sammelgut]
 Most of this wiki page will involve issues of the code/functional and

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 historic one.  (The FSF has held this position or something like it
 for a long time; alluded to slightly on their
-[http://www.yourminskapartment.com/apartment-in-minsk.html apartments for rent in Minsk]
+[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html#non-functional-data distribution guidelines about non-functional data].)
 It looks something like: