4.0/Draft 2/Regional calls - Revision history

Aurelia Schultz: /* Compatibility */

2012-10-09T17:40:31Z

‎Compatibility

CCID-diane peters: /* Termination and cure period */

2012-10-02T00:29:57Z

‎Termination and cure period

Kat Walsh: /* Underakings by licensors with respect to rights in the work */ typo fix

2012-10-01T23:21:57Z

‎Underakings by licensors with respect to rights in the work: typo fix

Aurelia Schultz: /* Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) */

2012-09-20T15:28:04Z

‎Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Aurelia Schultz: /* Scope of license */

2012-09-18T21:15:05Z

‎Scope of license

Aurelia Schultz at 16:24, 18 September 2012

2012-09-18T16:24:39Z

Show changes

Aurelia Schultz at 16:13, 18 September 2012

2012-09-18T16:13:55Z

Show changes

Aurelia Schultz: Created page with "=notes = Creative Commons held its second round of regional calls in August 2012. Like the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Draft_1/Regional_calls affilia..."

2012-09-18T16:05:22Z

Created page with "=<small>notes</small> = Creative Commons held its second round of regional calls in August 2012. Like the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Draft_1/Regional_calls affilia..."

Show changes

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 * Be mindful of license issues that are related specifically to software
 * Compatibility would be useful so that people do not have to comply with the terms for two licenses
-* Recommend that CC and organizations with whom compatibility is forged that guidelines are produced about how licensees can fulfil thel obligations of both licenses
+* Recommend that CC and organizations with whom compatibility is forged that guidelines are produced about how licensees can fulfill the obligations of both licenses
@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 Latin America:
 * Compatibility is very important
 ==Scope of license==

@@ Line 189: / Line 189: @@
-== Termination and cure period ==
+== Termination and automatic (limited) reinstatement upon cure ==
 Since the beginning of the 4.0 process we have considered introducing a GPL or MPL-like reinstatement provision that would facilitate the ability of licensors who had violated the license to receive their rights back automatically upon cure of the violation.   CC is planning to move forward with this proposal absent a problem from a compatibility perspective with the Free Art License.
@@ Line 223: / Line 223: @@
 Latin America
 * Strongly support the inclusion of a cure period because it makes us seem flexible, but unsure how to implement it.
 == Data licensing and information mining ==

@@ Line 426: / Line 426: @@
-== Underakings by licensors with respect to rights in the work ==
+== Undertakings by licensors with respect to rights in the work ==
 A proposal has been recently introduced on the list that would require a licensor who is aware of third party rights to a work to document those rights in a way that the limitations of the license are visible to would-be licensees.  This proposal is not a warranty or representation in the nature of what CC had in the version 1.0 licenses, since removed.  It is instead in the spirit of a documentation obligation.
@@ Line 471: / Line 471: @@
 Latin America
 * No specific comments
 == Other items raised (open discussion) ==

@@ Line 355: / Line 355: @@
 * Suggestion to add another tick box on the license chooser that allows people to add an ADR provision into the licenses
 * Suggestion to allow people to signal their desire to use ADR through some sort of guidelines
-* No problem in Uganda with having ADR in the license text
+* No problem in Uganda with having ADR as an option, but it should not be in the license text itself so that options remain open to licensors and licensees
@@ Line 372: / Line 372: @@
 Latin America
 * No specific comments
 == NonCommercial and NoDerivatives ==

@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
 * Recommendation to not use WIPO language because it doesn’t add anything
 * Reminder that WIPO members are working to create more sui generis rights including broadcast and traditional knowledge
@@ Line 149: / Line 158: @@
 * A general clause won’t work, need to be very careful with language
 * List rights as examples and try to cover all that exist
 == Collection language ==