4.0/Draft 1/Regional calls - Revision history

Hamilton Abreu: Reverted edits by Nurhusien Hasen (talk) to last revision by Aurelia Schultz

2013-10-28T06:07:12Z

Reverted edits by Nurhusien Hasen (talk) to last revision by Aurelia Schultz

Nurhusien Hasen: /* Attribution */

2013-10-11T23:10:52Z

‎Attribution

Aurelia Schultz at 15:55, 18 September 2012

2012-09-18T15:55:16Z

CCID-diane peters: /* notes */

2012-06-23T03:55:31Z

‎notes

CCID-diane peters: /* notes */

2012-06-23T03:54:55Z

‎notes

CCID-diane peters: /* notes */

2012-06-23T03:53:03Z

‎notes

CCID-diane peters: /* notes */

2012-06-20T23:40:36Z

‎notes

CCID-diane peters: /* notes */

2012-06-20T23:39:25Z

‎notes

CCID-diane peters: /* notes */

2012-06-20T23:36:37Z

‎notes

Aurelia Schultz at 22:43, 20 June 2012

2012-06-20T22:43:57Z

@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 * Because fulfilling the attribution requirements is a requirement that if violated results in termination, we need more flexibility. Consider softening termination clause because if this is a problem with attribution, it may be a problem with other license requirements as well.
 * Attribution stacking needs to be addressed by including more information for licensees on how to deal with this problem. A technical solution to the problem would be even better.
 ==Termination (and possible addition of cure period or materiality threshold)==

@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 * Because fulfilling the attribution requirements is a requirement that if violated results in termination, we need more flexibility. Consider softening termination clause because if this is a problem with attribution, it may be a problem with other license requirements as well.
 * Attribution stacking needs to be addressed by including more information for licensees on how to deal with this problem. A technical solution to the problem would be even better.
 ==Termination (and possible addition of cure period or materiality threshold)==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Arab World: Egypt, UAE, Algeria, Oman, Qatar, Jordan, Lebanon
-Asia-Pacific: Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Australia, Jordan, and South Korea
+Asia Pacific: Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Australia, Jordan, and South Korea
 Europe: Netherlands, Ireland, UK England & Wales, Ukraine, Czech Republic, Sweden, Italy, Croatia, France, Poland, Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Russia, and Portugal

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 These conversations gave CC the opportunity to receive targeted feedback from legal experts and others who are deeply familiar with the CC license suite, have experience advising users of the licenses in multiple domains such as education, science, culture, GLAM, data, and public sector information, and understand how the CC licenses operate under varying and sometimes quite intricate national copyright laws.
-The following topics were covered in each regional meeting/call, with an initial overview of the issue provided by CC HQ (which are also included below):
+The following topics were covered in each regional meeting/call, with initial overviews of the issues provided by CC HQ (which are also included below):
 # [[#Scope and operation of license:  copyright, neighboring rights, moral rights and ancillary rights|Scope and operation of license:  copyright, neighboring rights, moral rights and ancillary rights]]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 These conversations gave CC the opportunity to receive targeted feedback from legal experts and others who are deeply familiar with the CC license suite, have experience advising users of the licenses in multiple domains such as education, science, culture, GLAM, data, and public sector information, and understand how the CC licenses operate under varying and sometimes quite intricate national copyright laws.
-The following topics were covered in each regional meeting/call:
+The following topics were covered in each regional meeting/call, with an initial overview of the issue provided by CC HQ (which are also included below):
 # [[#Scope and operation of license:  copyright, neighboring rights, moral rights and ancillary rights|Scope and operation of license:  copyright, neighboring rights, moral rights and ancillary rights]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =<small>notes</small> =
-In May 2012, Creative Commons engaged with its affiliates around the world and across six regions to discuss the first draft of the version 4.0 license and core policy and drafting decisions. <br>
+In May 2012, Creative Commons engaged with its affiliates around the world and across six regions to discuss the first draft of the version 4.0 licenses. <br>
 These conversations gave CC the opportunity to receive targeted feedback from legal experts and others who are deeply familiar with the CC license suite, have experience advising users of the licenses in multiple domains such as education, science, culture, GLAM, data, and public sector information, and understand how the CC licenses operate under varying and sometimes quite intricate national copyright laws.

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 {| class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width=100%
 |valign="TOP" style="background:#6600CC;color:#FFFFFF;border:5px #FDAFAF;"|
-'''Important Note:'''  The summaries provided below are provided for informational purposes only.  This summary is not necessarily complete, may not correctly or completely reflect the views of the participants, and must not be depended upon for legally accuracy or serve as legal advice.
+'''Important Note:'''  The summaries provided below are provided for informational purposes only.  These summaries are not necessarily complete, may not correctly or completely reflect the views of the participants, and must not be depended upon for legally accuracy or serve as legal advice.
 |}

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 In May 2012, Creative Commons engaged with its affiliates around the world and across six regions to discuss the first draft of the version 4.0 license and core policy and drafting decisions. <br>
-These conversations gave CC the opportunity to receive targeted feedback from legal experts and others who are deeply familiar with the CC license suite, how the licenses are leveraged across multiple domains such as education, science, data, public sector information, and how the CC licenses operate under varying, national copyright laws.
+These conversations gave CC the opportunity to receive targeted feedback from legal experts and others who are deeply familiar with the CC license suite, have experience advising users of the licenses in multiple domains such as education, science, culture, GLAM, data, and public sector information, and understand how the CC licenses operate under varying and sometimes quite intricate national copyright laws.
 The following topics were covered in each regional meeting/call:
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Africa: Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa
 Arab World: Egypt, UAE, Algeria, Oman, Qatar, Jordan, Lebanon
 Asia-Pacific: Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Australia, Jordan, and South Korea
 Europe: Netherlands, Ireland, UK England & Wales, Ukraine, Czech Republic, Sweden, Italy, Croatia, France, Poland, Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Russia, Portugal
-Latin America: Costa Rica, Puerto Rico, Guatemala, Perú, Chile, México, Brasil, Ecuador
+Europe: Netherlands, Ireland, UK England & Wales, Ukraine, Czech Republic, Sweden, Italy, Croatia, France, Poland, Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Russia, and Portugal
 North America: Canada, United States

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 '''Important Note:'''  The summaries provided below are provided for informational purposes only.  This summary is not necessarily complete, may not correctly or completely reflect the views of the participants, and must not be depended upon for legally accuracy or serve as legal advice.
 |}
 ==Scope and operation of license:  copyright, neighboring rights, moral rights and ancillary rights==
@@ Line 121: / Line 122: @@
 Latin America:
 * Language in draft is good because it indicates the waiver does not apply in jurisdictions where waiver is not enforceable. A unilateral promise not to enforce rights is enforceable in most civil law jurisdictions, so it is good that the provision includes this as a fall back.
 ==NonCommercial definition==
@@ Line 154: / Line 156: @@
 * Any definition will have problems. Best not to change existing definition without clear and robust arguments in favor of doing so.
 * General guidelines about the NC clause may be useful.
 ==Attribution==
@@ Line 200: / Line 203: @@
 * Because fulfilling the attribution requirements is a requirement that if violated results in termination, we need more flexibility. Consider softening termination clause because if this is a problem with attribution, it may be a problem with other license requirements as well.
 * Attribution stacking needs to be addressed by including more information for licensees on how to deal with this problem. A technical solution to the problem would be even better.
 ==Termination (and possible addition of cure period or materiality threshold)==
@@ Line 235: / Line 239: @@
 * Once licensee fixes their breach, they should get their rights reinstated.
 * Materiality threshold could be ambiguous, so we may want to specify what breaches are considered material and cause automatic termination. We could allow other types of breaches to be fixable. This would blend both proposed approaches.
 ==Technical Protection Measures==
@@ Line 271: / Line 276: @@
 Latin America:
 * Licensor is not often the one that can grant permission to circumvent TPM, so it is not clear how this approach would be workable.
 ==Additional Terms (proposed)==
@@ Line 317: / Line 323: @@
 * Not a good idea. Seems to be a solution in search of a problem.
 * Comes down to a policy choice between increasing uptake of CC licensing and compatibility between licenses. Favor increased adoption because this will, in turn, lead to more material being CC licensed.
 ==Collecting Societies==
@@ Line 343: / Line 350: @@
 Latin America:
 * No specific feedback.
 ==Other issues raised==