<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=%C3%84ventyrsgruvan_i_Tuna_H%C3%A4stberg_v._Gunnarsson</id>
		<title>Äventyrsgruvan i Tuna Hästberg v. Gunnarsson - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=%C3%84ventyrsgruvan_i_Tuna_H%C3%A4stberg_v._Gunnarsson"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=%C3%84ventyrsgruvan_i_Tuna_H%C3%A4stberg_v._Gunnarsson&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-06T00:55:16Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=%C3%84ventyrsgruvan_i_Tuna_H%C3%A4stberg_v._Gunnarsson&amp;diff=115219&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>CCID-rob: Add Äventyrsgruvan i Tuna Hästberg v. Gunnarsson ( https://github.com/creativecommons/creativecommons.org/issues/246 )</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=%C3%84ventyrsgruvan_i_Tuna_H%C3%A4stberg_v._Gunnarsson&amp;diff=115219&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2016-05-13T18:06:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Add Äventyrsgruvan i Tuna Hästberg v. Gunnarsson ( https://github.com/creativecommons/creativecommons.org/issues/246 )&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Case Law&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Äventyrsgruvan i Tuna Hästberg v. Gunnarsson&lt;br /&gt;
|region=Sweden&lt;br /&gt;
|court=SVEA HOVRÄTT&lt;br /&gt;
|date=2016-02-25&lt;br /&gt;
|description=Swedish court dismissed photo attribution claim as plaintiff could not demonstrate they held the rights.&lt;br /&gt;
|summary='''BACKROUND'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photographer licensed a photo using the Swedish port of CC BY-NC-ND version 2.5. When the photo was reused by the defendant, he attributed the company that published the photograph but not the original photographer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''RESULT'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was unable to demonstrate that they owned rights to the photograph. The decision was upheld on appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sweden]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCID-rob</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>