<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Th</id>
		<title>Creative Commons - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Th"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Th"/>
		<updated>2026-04-25T14:24:52Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=4.0/Sandbox&amp;diff=54288</id>
		<title>4.0/Sandbox</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=4.0/Sandbox&amp;diff=54288"/>
				<updated>2011-12-10T10:06:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Th: Font embedding&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''This page is designed as a gathering place for suggestions from the community. If you have an idea for an issue that is not yet addressed in one of the issue pages linked from the [[4.0]] page, please follow this process:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:# Review the existing issue pages to see if your new idea would fit on an existing page. If so, feel free to add it yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
:# Please refer to the [[Legalcode_errata | Legal Code Errata]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; This page contains a list of errors and typos in the licenses. CC will be making changes in 4.0 to correct these problems (assuming the problematic text remains in 4.0).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  page to see if your concern is addressed here. &lt;br /&gt;
:# If the issue is not already addressed, please refer to the [[License_Versions | License Versions]] page to review issues debated in prior versions and the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/ CC license discuss archives].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;TK&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If you want to re-open a conversation on an issue or proposal debated in a prior versioning effort, please summarize and link to that prior discussion, indicating why the issue ought be revisited.&lt;br /&gt;
:# If your issue is not adequately covered, you can't find a proper home on these pages, or you would prefer that HQ decide where it best fits on the wiki, please add the issue in the relevant section below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disclaimer of warranties and related issues== &lt;br /&gt;
''Please include a description of the issue(s) with links to relevant references where applicable.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Collecting societies == &lt;br /&gt;
''Please include a description of the issue(s) with links to relevant references where applicable.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Choice of law and enforcement issues == &lt;br /&gt;
''Please include a description of the issue(s) with links to relevant references where applicable.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drafting language and style ==  &lt;br /&gt;
''Please include a description of the issue(s) with links to relevant references where applicable.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NoDerivs condition ==  &lt;br /&gt;
ND has not been nearly as discussed as [[4.0/NonCommercial|NC]], but it has the same problems of non-freeness and probable over-use. Some of the NC proposals (eg rebranding, dropping, or only keeping one instance of) have ND analogues that ought be separately and thoroughly evaluated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== (Font) Embedding Issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
This issue comes from the field of font licensing: if you release a font under a CC-SA license, do all users who embed the font in their PDF documents have to put their PDFs under CC-SA as well?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CC general counsel seems to believe that they do not. The German legal counsel seems to believe that the font creator can use a &amp;quot;font exception&amp;quot; (known from GNU), number 8. of the license notwithstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to see it differently, as do the vast majority of type designers and font publishers; their postition wrt font embedding is very clear and many of them have updated their license agreements to allow font embedding under restrictive terms (subsetting required etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm coming from the font side of this, but I can imagine that there are many more fields, where this &amp;quot;if you modify the work itself, you need to reciprocate, if you just use it as it's supposed to be used without modifications, mere embedding/aggregating do not legally force you to use CC-SA&amp;quot; would be beneficial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other issues for 4.0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Please include a description of the issue with links to relevant references where applicable.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Th</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>