Creative Commons - User contributions [en]

User talk:Mike Linksvayer

2011-11-03T05:57:48Z

Master grand: for stupid idiot

Test. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 16:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

== + Russian ==

Please.

# [[Talk:CcWiki:About#+ Russian]]
# [[Ru:ЧАВО]]
# [[Ru:О чем нужно подумать, прежде чем лицензировать свою работу под CC-лицензиями]]
--[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 16:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

:Links added. However, could you remove the comma from the 'Before Licensing' translation article title? Commas are used to separate translations, which is probably suboptimal. Thanks! [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 00:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:: 1) Ok. [[Ru:Перед лицензированием]]. 2) Can I to post in this wiki the translation of pages of main site, for example, translation of page http://creativecommons.org/about/? If the answer is "i can", how to name translated pages ("Ru:About" or "Ru:О проекте", etc)? Just site of "Creative Commons Russia" inactive since mid-2007 and almost always the site is not working. 3) Is it possible to add [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgXnBXr-8PY this video] on some Creative Commons hosting (for example, http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/)? 4) Can I to post in this wiki the translation of full texts of CC-licenses (now it is [http://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:Creative_Commons here])? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 17:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:::1) Thanks! 2) You can. I'd say use a Russian title that describes the content, so probably "About CC" in Russian. 3) http://code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue322 4) Prefer you don't, there isn't an official Russian translation of the legal texts and we'd be sensitive about giving the impression there is. Regarding this and a CC Russia website, I could put you in touch with the person trying to get CC Russia started and licenses ported.[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 03:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:::: Very well! 4) [http://www.sybski.ru/ Syb Groeneveld]? I will write him e-mail. 5) Why don't work http://translate.creativecommons.org/ru/? I translated all the phrases on http://translate.creativecommons.org/ru/, but the page still shows "679 untranslated words". And how to translate others projects as it is done on the page http://translate.creativecommons.org/de/? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 11:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::4) Yes, Syb is the person. 5) http://code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue323 [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 14:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

== Pages to delete ==

I noticed you've done some deletions recently, according to [[Special:Log/delete|the log]], so I thought I'd notify you of some more pages that need that treatment. You can find them in [[:Category:Pages to be deleted]] (which I just created). Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

== Disabling editing ==

I wanted to let you know that I've now blocked, via the [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] the possibility for non-administrators to save pages containing any URLs that end with any of the major GTLDs (.com, .org, .net, .info), as a last ditch effort against the tide of spam we've been getting. This has the side effect of severely impeding editing by non-administrators, which we would rather not do. I think there are some more targeted solutions available, but I don't have access to them as a mere administrator, so I wanted to bring the situation to your attention. I'll keep watching for crap to clean up. Good luck. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 17:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks! We're looking into ways of throttling the bogus acct creation and subsequent spamming we're seeing. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 17:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
::Great. Let me know (via my talk page preferably, or email otherwise) if I can help in any way. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 05:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::If it is feasible to install the AbuseFilter extension, that is quite flexible enough to allow me to block the current tactics of the spammers... But upgrading MediaWiki to support it might be a large hassle... [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

For the moment, would you just shut off account creation completely -- and tell people to email if they want an account? That would at least stop the deluge -- at this rate, it's not going to be feasible to clean up if it continues... [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
::This can be done (albeit inefficiently) by blocking all ~65,000 /16 ranges; I've done the first three as a demonstration here: [[Special:BlockList]]; I could hack up a script to do the rest of them if necessary. PLEASE, do something sooner rather than later, and render this unnecessary. Or just reenable the SpamBlacklist extension so I can use *that* to prevent the flood. Or just take the wiki offline; but somthing is urgently needed.
==Cleaning up the mess==
The page [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:NewPages&limit=500&namespace=2 Special:NewPages] provides a good list of the ~150 pages that need to be deleted. I see you've done some already; any (more) spare time you have to chop a few more would be certainly appreciated. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 17:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

== Restore link to Russian ==

* Hello. Why [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=next&oldid=22795 was removed link to the Russian]? Please, restore link to Russian. --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 17:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
** Must have been an incomplete copy/paste, I've restored it, thanks! [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 19:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

== [[FFAQ#Is use X a violation of the Noncommercial clause of the licenses?]] ==

"We hope to announce the results of the study in early 2009." Can you update the page? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 05:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
:Done, thanks! --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 06:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
:: I'm also done with translation =)) +[[Ru:FFAQ]] --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 04:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
:::Cool, thanks! Added translation link to [[FFAQ]] --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 07:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

== [[Browser Plugin]] ==

Hello! Can you restore this page? I think, that it's very useful. --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 13:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
:Done. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 17:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

== Russian translation of Commons Deed ==

Hello again! Please help me. We want to publish Russian Commons Deed on CC website (on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.ru) WITHOUT porting of licenses to Russian law. Why not? Esperanto version was published, but Esperanto don't have official status in some country. Russian version is important thing, it not just state language of Russia, it is lingua franca in countries of former USSR like Esperanto. Why not to publish translation? Can you help me? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 17:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
:Hello again! Thanks for contributing to http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/CC/team/ru/ ... I'm looking into this, will report back here ASAP. --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 17:43, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
:Also, http://code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue667 --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 18:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
:: Hmm... I don't understand this. =)) Explain to me, Russian translation will be published or not? When? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 18:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
:: So... what? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 20:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
:: Thanks! --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 13:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:: Why Russian [http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.ru CC0] and [http://search.creativecommons.org/?lang=ru CCSearch] don't work? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 22:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:::CC0 probably because latest changes aren't live yet. I believe http://staging.creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.ru ought reflect what is in transifex. I will check with our sysadmin on pushing live Monday. Search, we're about to make some major changes, so translations haven't been updated on the live site for awhile. I'll write back Monday on status of that as well. Thanks! [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:::: Also don't work [http://creativecommons.org/choose/?lang=ru Russian License Chooser] (text in English, but it translated to Russian), but early Chooser works. --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 07:32, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::::: Added info/who to ping to push to production at http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Translating_CC_Deeds#When_Does_The_Server_Get_Updated.3F [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 22:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
:::::: But [http://search.creativecommons.org/?lang=ru CCSearch] translated several month ago, but yet don't works. Maybe it different error, not just updating? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 09:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

== creativecommons.ru ==

Hello again! I want create Russian CC website. Can I get access to settings of creativecommons.ru? Or can you make some changes in settings of creativecommons.ru? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 00:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
:Generally such sites are run by a jurisdiction affiliate, but current behavior of http://www.creativecommons.ru/ isn't optimal. I'm going to have to discuss with others in CC. I'll give you an update as well as ETA re above turning on Russian deed translations next week. Thanks for poking on this. --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 19:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
::For now http://creativecommons.ru has been made to redirect to http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Ru:%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 though for some reason www. isn't yet, will soon. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::: Can you give creativecommons.ru to me, not redirect to wiki? I create [http://creativecommonsru.narod.ru/ prototype of Russian page] and want that you change NS-servers to ns.narod2.ru and ns1.narod2.ru or add CNAME: "creativecommons.ru IN CNAME creativecommonsru.narod2.ru". --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 06:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::: You can do this? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 21:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
:::: Hi, apologies for late response. You should email diane@creativecommmons.org about your interest in running the creativecommons.ru site. Diane runs our affiliate program, including the agreements necessary to allow one to run an official CC jurisdiction website. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 22:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
::::: Unfortunately, "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender". Maybe other contact? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 13:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::: Oops, typo, extra 'm' in domain, my fault. Try diane@creativecommons.org [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 22:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
::::::: Oh, right! --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 22:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

== Deletion ==

Please delete [[Ru:О творческих общинах]], [[Ru:Лицензии Creative Commons]] and [[Ru:Лицензии]]. --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 00:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
:Done. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:: No. Please restore and delete exactly redirects, not pages. --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 05:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::: Sorry, should be the way you want now. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 06:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
:::: Thanks! --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 09:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

== [[Metrics]] ==

Hello! When will update of "Approximate Minimum Total CC Licensed Works"? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 04:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
:Hello! Probably in April. We're trying to add/corroborate with other data sources, as Yahoo!'s index is probably getting stale. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 18:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

== CC licenses is revocable in Russia ==

Hello! What do you think that according to Russian law all licenses will revocable is critical problem? Is it serious obstacle for porting of licenses? Will CC in future approve Russian CC licenses without irrevocable term? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 13:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
: As far as I understand "[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license: The author's moral rights]" and it means that moral "right of withdrawal" not conflicted with CC. Yes? CC licenses ported to French law, in which also [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_copyright_law#Moral_rights exists "right of withdrawal"]. --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 11:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
:: Hello?! --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 11:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
:: Hi, sorry for late response. I'm not aware of that particular problem. Others having been cited are requirement of an actual signature and inability to make a free license between two profit making enterprises. These may make using a public license in Russia theoretically impossible; I have no idea what their practical import is. I expect porting activity to wind down for now pending discussion of how we address in 4.0, so it is probably a moot point specifically regarding a port. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 00:30, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

== Seal "Approved for Free Cultural Works" font ==

Hi! could you let us know the name of the Fonts used for making the Green "Approved for Free Cultural Works" seal? I'm thinking of translating it to Spanish.

Thanks in advance. --[[User:Wazaraki|Wazaraki]]

: Oh, also about Free Cultural Works. And I want to set link to [http://freedomdefined.org/Definition/Ru Russian translation] instead standard English. Can you do this? --[[User:TarzanASG|TarzanASG]] 09:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

: See File:Approved-for-free-cultural-works.svg for source, please translate and upload translation. TarzanASG, I'm not sure how easy that will be, but I've added a feature request http://code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue865 --[[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 01:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

== The only warning ! ==

If you will make this again, then will regret very strongly. Be careful. Offenders which create psevdo licenses having no legal force in any country, will destroyed like cockroaches. You can be sure. You are vandal. You and your friends will pay millions of dollars for the desecration of copyright. This is warning. I know about every piece of this criminal territory, where rights holders lose these millions of dollars. Under my control are the biggest social networks of Russia which related to The Beatles and not only. I can easy tell about crimes which implement here, for big number of different people (a lot of of thousand). Sit quietly and do not move, stupid fool. I hope you understood me. --[[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 05:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

CCPlus

2011-10-10T17:41:49Z

Master grand: /* Adopters */ ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY

{{Project}}
{{Initiative}}

{{Infobox|
'''CC+''' is '''CC license''' + '''Another agreement'''.

It is '''NOT''' a new license, but a facilitation of '''morePermissions''' beyond '''ANY''' standard CC licenses.

If you want to adopt CC+, please '''(1)''' implement [[#Easy_CC.2B_Markups|CC+ simple technology]] on your site, '''(2)''' [[#Adopters|add your project/company name]], and '''(3)''' [http://creativecommons.org/contact let us know!]
|}}

== Simple Explanation ==

The basic concept is to have a Creative Commons license + some other agreement which provides morePermissions.

[[Image:Cc-by-nc-3.0-88x31.png]] + [[Image:Commercial-license-button.png]]


NOTE: Above, the CC license should link to the human deed and the generic commercial license would link to a place to get a commercial license for a work. The COMMERCIAL LICENSE is generic and should be tailored for specific uses with specific names of copyright holders.



[http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/b/b4/Commercial-license-button.svg Here is the SVG (vector graphic)] to the generic button if you would like to construct a commercial licensing button for your usage. The button is [http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en released into the public domain].


== Summary ==

CC+ is a protocol providing a simple way for users to get rights
beyond the rights granted by a CC license. For example, a work's Creative
Commons license might offer noncommercial rights. With CC+, the
license can also provide a link by which a user might secure rights beyond noncommercial
rights -- most obviously commercial rights, but also additional permissions or
services such as warranty, permission to use without attribution, or even access to performance or physical media.

The CC+ architecture gives businesses a simple way to move
between the sharing and commercial economies. CC+ provides a
lightweight standard around these best practices and is available for
implementation immediately.

==Solvable Problems==

=== Legal ===

Creative Commons has solved this with Creative Commons licensing. Creative Commons has this one locked down. Rely on CC.

* [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/d/da/Cc-general.pdf What is CC?] - One Page (pdf)

=== Human ===

Creative Commons has structured this so that you and/or your project can implement the rest of the social part to this equation.

* [[Media:Ccplus-general.pdf|CC+ General.pdf]] - CC and CC+ Overview for the World Wide Web (pdf)
* Concepts and Pieces
** healthy ecosystem

=== Technical ===

Similar to [[#Human]], CC has structured the Technical part of CC+ so that you can implement the technical standard to be in compliance.

* [[Media:Ccplus-technical.pdf|CC+ Technical.pdf]] - CC+ Technical Implementation for the World Wide Web (pdf) explaining how to add CC+ functionality to your site.
* Concepts and Pieces
** [[RDFa]] and morePermissions
** [[OpenStar]]

==Easy CC+ Markups==

===Simplest CC+ Example ===

<pre>
My Book by Jon Phillips is licensed under a

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">Creative Commons
Attribution Non-Commercial 3.0 License</a>.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at
<a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" rel="cc:morePermissions"
href="http://somecompany.com/revenue_sharing_agreement">somecompany.com</a>.
</pre>

===A complete CC+ Implementation===

<pre>


My Book by
<a rel="cc:attributionURL" property="cc:attributionName" href="http://rejon.org/my_book">Jon Phillips</a>

is licensed under a

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">Creative Commons
Attribution Non-Commercial 3.0 License</a>.


Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at
<a rel="cc:morePermissions"
href="http://somecompany.com/revenue_sharing_agreement">somecompany.com</a>.


</pre>

=== A simple example of custom agreement on the same page ===

<pre>
<a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" rel="cc:morePermissions" href="#agreement">below</a>

<a id="agreement">The Agreement</a>
... agreement text...
</pre>

=== A simple agreement leading to mailto ===

<pre>
<a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
rel="cc:morePermissions" href="mailto:someuser@somedomain.com">custom license</a>
</pre>
<br\>
Please note: the additional CC+ section in the deed will appear only if the document you're clicking to the deed from is accessible on the public Internet.

== Use Cases ==

* Restrict commercial use with a CC license with the NonCommercial condition, and then use a separate agreement with some party (could be yourself or third-party) to broker commercial rights (licensing, sales, reproduction, etc).
* Require that adaptions are shared with a CC license with the ShareAlike condition, but offer a separate agreement (as above) for parties that do not want to release derivatives under the same license. Similar use cases for offering a private agreement for parties that wish to avoid fulfilling the Attribution or NoDerivatives properties of applicable CC licenses.
* Offer a private agreement for parties that require one (eg for institutional policy or insurance reasons), even if their use would be within the scope of the public license grant.
* To implement some type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_Performer_Protocol Street Performer Protocol] system to put works to the public domain or into another license, preferably more free and in the community interest.

== Media ==

* The basics of this idea were formulated for [http://www.slideshare.net/rejon/phillips-remix-cycle-pixelodeon-2007 Pixelodeon 2007 slides].
* [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos#ccp CC+ Video] by Eric Steuer. Script text [[CCPlus_video_script|here]].
* [[Media:Ccplus-general.pdf|CC+ general.pdf]] - CC and CC+ Overview for the World Wide Web (pdf)
* [[Media:Ccplus-technical.pdf|CC+ technical.pdf]] - CC+ Technical Implementation for the World Wide Web (pdf)
* [[Media:Cc_plus_cc_zero_pr.pdf|Press Release.pdf]] - CC+ Official Press Release (pdf)

<gallery>
Image:Ccplus slides.035.jpg
Image:Ccplus slides.039.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.044.jpg
</gallery>

== Examples ==

===Jamendo===
<gallery>
Image:Ccplus_slides.046.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.047.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.048.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.050.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.051.jpg
</gallery>

===Magnatune===
<gallery>
Image:Ccplus_slides.052.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.053.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.054.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.055.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.057.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.058.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.059.jpg
</gallery>

===BeatPick===
<gallery>
Image:Ccplus_slides.061.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.062.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.063.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.064.jpg
Image:Ccplus_slides.065.jpg
</gallery>

=== Mockups ===

* [[CCPlus Integration Mockups]]
* [[Facebook CC+ Integration]]
* [[Virb CC Integration|Virb CC+ Integration]]
* [[Myspace CCPlus Integration|Myspace CC+ Integration]]
* [[Imeem CCPlus Integration|imeem CC+ Integration]]
* [[Blip CCPlus Integration|Blip.tv CC+ Integration]]

=== Actual ===

* [[Strayform CCPlus Integration|Strayform CC+ Integration]]

== Adopters ==

* [[Yahoo]]
* [[Blip.tv]]
* [[Jamendo]]
* [[Magnatune]]
* [[Beatpick]]
* [[RightsAgent]]
* [[Youlicense]]
* [[Strayform]]
* [[Cloakx]]
* [[Copyright Clearance Center]] via http://ozmo.com/
* [[RRT Group]]
* [[WIPmania]]
* [[Uncensored Interview]]
* [[LIFE Computers]]
* [[New York State Senate]]
* [[RightsPro]]
* [[2lifeCast]]
* [[Проект: Центр адаптации научной работы: Основы сексологии]]
* [[ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY]]
* Add your project here!

== FAQ ==

=== What is a simple way of explaining CC+? ===

CC+ is just what it sounds like, a Creative Commons license plus another agreement. A copyright holder might pair a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license [CC] with a non-exclusive commercial agreement [+] enabling a company to license the work commercially for a fee.

=== Isn't CC+ just a technological facilitation of dual licensing? ===

Yes. A copyright holder who uses a Creative Commons license is already adding a license on top of their copyright. CC+ can make it easier for that copyright-holder to add other non-exclusive licenses/agreements as alternatives.

== External Links ==

* http://labs.creativecommons.org/metadata
* Press
** http://blogs.magnatune.com/buckman/2007/12/creative-common.html
** http://www.linuxelectrons.com/news/general/15548/creative-commons-launches-cc0-cc-programs
** http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/12/19/1948209.shtml
** http://reddevnews.com/news/article.aspx?editorialsid=9377
** http://www.adtmag.com/article.aspx?id=21771
* Research
** http://www.warsystems.hu/?p=517
** http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7711
** http://blogs.photopreneur.com/how-to-get-paid-for-your-flickr-photos
* Links to CCPlus licenses
** http://www.nysenate.gov/copyright-policy

==How do you get involved?==
Jump on over to the [http://creativecommons.org/contact CC-Community and/or CC-Licenses email lists] for further discussion on CCPlus.

[[category:protocol]]
[[Category:License and CCPlus]]

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-10-09T05:55:05Z

Master grand: /* Spam page? */Adequate measure: Man, who lets self the slander and insults, not gave apology, therefore, its theme is removed as spam!

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! How long to wait for more? All actions on our site are frozen, because has a place a ambiguity (no incentive). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

* I posted a notice, that a large part of the collection is in the public domain in the Russian Federation. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Where are you .. I need some advice sometimes. Look at the changes on the home page, including the Convention about free access to a culture for all people in the world and about the need to create conditions for the global spread of this culture. http://beatles1.ru/ I think that is good. Convention shall be binding and signed by the states - members of UNESCO. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need to ask you a few questions. Or you may write me at email, please. mailto:beatles80@yandex.com ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* I want use a parametric license. How can I do it ? ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need a little help. I can not understand some moments about CC+ license, which I want use. Please, help me! I very hope. ----[[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 17:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! CC+ is ready. See the copyright information: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . - [[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 05:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

== Adequate measure: ==

* Man, who lets self the slander and insults, not gave apology, therefore, its theme is removed as spam! Not exists. [[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 05:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-10-09T05:39:01Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hello! CC+ is ready. See the copyright information:

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! How long to wait for more? All actions on our site are frozen, because has a place a ambiguity (no incentive). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

* I posted a notice, that a large part of the collection is in the public domain in the Russian Federation. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Where are you .. I need some advice sometimes. Look at the changes on the home page, including the Convention about free access to a culture for all people in the world and about the need to create conditions for the global spread of this culture. http://beatles1.ru/ I think that is good. Convention shall be binding and signed by the states - members of UNESCO. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need to ask you a few questions. Or you may write me at email, please. mailto:beatles80@yandex.com ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* I want use a parametric license. How can I do it ? ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need a little help. I can not understand some moments about CC+ license, which I want use. Please, help me! I very hope. ----[[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 17:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! CC+ is ready. See the copyright information: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . - [[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 05:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

== Spam page? ==

Hi. There's a user over on Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ron_Halls] who is spamming a link to one of the pages on this Wiki: [[ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY]] - which looks like it's a big copyright violation with a false CC license on it. Just thought I'd bring it to somebody's attention over here, and you are the first active person I found. Thanks. - [[User:Mrollie4|Mrollie4]] 17:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Mrollie4, don't call this project so. Otherwise, you`ll get a claim in court for libel and insults. We`ll take a lot of money. Also, I`m waiting for an apology on this page. I hope, you understood me well. Isn`t it? In addition, you should eliminate all violations against the project. Violations which had been provoked by other person. He wrote me to email, offering support in American law. In this context, any links associated with this project, must be restored, if they were deleted on Wikipedia (not through our fault). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 19:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Do you poorly understand me, Mrollie4? I thought that the Americans are smart people, but obviously, the rights of a teacher from the movie "Kickboxer". I'm waiting for an apology. You can tell to your friends that they can not distinguish black from white (can not distinguish spam of the cultural and educational purposes, promotion of the highest culture in the world.) You just need to be pitied. Read, the student: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001429/142919e.pdf and this: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm (obviously, you're so limited that did not read even the Declaration of human Rights). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 08:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Government

2011-09-01T01:36:18Z

Master grand: new category

<center> This category uses the form [[Has default form::Resource]] </center>

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-23T17:58:31Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hello! I need a little help. I can not understand some moments about CC+ license, which I want use. Please, help me!

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! How long to wait for more? All actions on our site are frozen, because has a place a ambiguity (no incentive). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

* I posted a notice, that a large part of the collection is in the public domain in the Russian Federation. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Where are you .. I need some advice sometimes. Look at the changes on the home page, including the Convention about free access to a culture for all people in the world and about the need to create conditions for the global spread of this culture. http://beatles1.ru/ I think that is good. Convention shall be binding and signed by the states - members of UNESCO. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need to ask you a few questions. Or you may write me at email, please. mailto:beatles80@yandex.com ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* I want use a parametric license. How can I do it ? ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need a little help. I can not understand some moments about CC+ license, which I want use. Please, help me! I very hope. ----[[User:Master grand|Grand Master]] 17:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

== Spam page? ==

Hi. There's a user over on Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ron_Halls] who is spamming a link to one of the pages on this Wiki: [[ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY]] - which looks like it's a big copyright violation with a false CC license on it. Just thought I'd bring it to somebody's attention over here, and you are the first active person I found. Thanks. - [[User:Mrollie4|Mrollie4]] 17:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Mrollie4, don't call this project so. Otherwise, you`ll get a claim in court for libel and insults. We`ll take a lot of money. Also, I`m waiting for an apology on this page. I hope, you understood me well. Isn`t it? In addition, you should eliminate all violations against the project. Violations which had been provoked by other person. He wrote me to email, offering support in American law. In this context, any links associated with this project, must be restored, if they were deleted on Wikipedia (not through our fault). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 19:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Do you poorly understand me, Mrollie4? I thought that the Americans are smart people, but obviously, the rights of a teacher from the movie "Kickboxer". I'm waiting for an apology. You can tell to your friends that they can not distinguish black from white (can not distinguish spam of the cultural and educational purposes, promotion of the highest culture in the world.) You just need to be pitied. Read, the student: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001429/142919e.pdf and this: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm (obviously, you're so limited that did not read even the Declaration of human Rights). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 08:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Official website of President of the Russian Federation

2011-08-22T02:30:05Z

Master grand: ONLINE COLLECTION FOR EDUCATION:

{{ContentDirectory
|mainurl=http://kremlin.ru/
|ccportal=http://kremlin.ru/
|ccfeed=http://kremlin.ru/feeds
|format=Image, Sound, Text, MovingImage
|size=145000
}}
* All materials (fotos, texts, videos, audios, etc.) of [http://kremlin.ru/eng/ Kremlin.ru (Official Website of President of the Russian Federation)], Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY 3.0 Unported)
** [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Kremlin_authorisation-English.pdf Letter of authorisation from the Press Secretary to the President of the Russian Federation allowing use of Kremlin.ru materials under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported licence (PDF, English, 3 October 2008)]
** [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Kremlin.ru Template on Wikimedia Commons (English and Russian)]
<center>[http://beatles1.ru <big><tt>ONLINE COLLECTION FOR EDUCATION: ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY</tt></big>]</center>
[[Category:Media]]
[[Category:OER Resources]]

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-21T08:53:34Z

Master grand: /* Spam page? */Do you poorly understand me, Mrollie4?

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! How long to wait for more? All actions on our site are frozen, because has a place a ambiguity (no incentive). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

* I posted a notice, that a large part of the collection is in the public domain in the Russian Federation. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Where are you .. I need some advice sometimes. Look at the changes on the home page, including the Convention about free access to a culture for all people in the world and about the need to create conditions for the global spread of this culture. http://beatles1.ru/ I think that is good. Convention shall be binding and signed by the states - members of UNESCO. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need to ask you a few questions. Or you may write me at email, please. mailto:beatles80@yandex.com ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* I want use a parametric license. How can I do it ? ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

== Spam page? ==

Hi. There's a user over on Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ron_Halls] who is spamming a link to one of the pages on this Wiki: [[ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY]] - which looks like it's a big copyright violation with a false CC license on it. Just thought I'd bring it to somebody's attention over here, and you are the first active person I found. Thanks. - [[User:Mrollie4|Mrollie4]] 17:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Mrollie4, don't call this project so. Otherwise, you`ll get a claim in court for libel and insults. We`ll take a lot of money. Also, I`m waiting for an apology on this page. I hope, you understood me well. Isn`t it? In addition, you should eliminate all violations against the project. Violations which had been provoked by other person. He wrote me to email, offering support in American law. In this context, any links associated with this project, must be restored, if they were deleted on Wikipedia (not through our fault). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 19:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Do you poorly understand me, Mrollie4? I thought that the Americans are smart people, but obviously, the rights of a teacher from the movie "Kickboxer". I'm waiting for an apology. You can tell to your friends that they can not distinguish black from white (can not distinguish spam of the cultural and educational purposes, promotion of the highest culture in the world.) You just need to be pitied. Read, the student: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001429/142919e.pdf and this: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm (obviously, you're so limited that did not read even the Declaration of human Rights). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 08:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-19T19:31:21Z

Master grand: /* Spam page? */ Mrollie4, don't call

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! How long to wait for more? All actions on our site are frozen, because has a place a ambiguity (no incentive). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

* I posted a notice, that a large part of the collection is in the public domain in the Russian Federation. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Where are you .. I need some advice sometimes. Look at the changes on the home page, including the Convention about free access to a culture for all people in the world and about the need to create conditions for the global spread of this culture. http://beatles1.ru/ I think that is good. Convention shall be binding and signed by the states - members of UNESCO. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I need to ask you a few questions. Or you may write me at email, please. mailto:beatles80@yandex.com ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

* I want use a parametric license. How can I do it ? ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

== Spam page? ==

Hi. There's a user over on Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ron_Halls] who is spamming a link to one of the pages on this Wiki: [[ART OF THE BEATLES IN THE GLOBAL LIBRARY]] - which looks like it's a big copyright violation with a false CC license on it. Just thought I'd bring it to somebody's attention over here, and you are the first active person I found. Thanks. - [[User:Mrollie4|Mrollie4]] 17:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

* Mrollie4, don't call this project so. Otherwise, you`ll get a claim in court for libel and insults. We`ll take a lot of money. Also, I`m waiting for an apology on this page. I hope, you understood me well. Isn`t it? In addition, you should eliminate all violations against the project. Violations which had been provoked by other person. He wrote me to email, offering support in American law. In this context, any links associated with this project, must be restored, if they were deleted on Wikipedia (not through our fault). ----[[User:Master grand|Evgeniy Red]] 19:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-17T17:05:40Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */I want use a parametric license. How can I do it ?

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-17T08:01:39Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hello! I need to.....

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-13T01:19:04Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hi! Where are you .. I need

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-11T07:44:53Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */I posted a notice, that a large part

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-10T07:13:34Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hello! How long to wait for more?

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! How long to wait for more? All actions on our site are frozen, because has a place a ambiguity (no incentive). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 07:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-09T03:49:40Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ I have everything ready

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* I have everything ready (article 14). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-08T14:01:40Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ By the way, yesterday

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* By the way, yesterday i became - one of UNESCO`s member. --[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-08T10:58:40Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello ! See: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/ip/wct/pdf/trtdocs_wo033.pdf - '''WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996'''. For Russia the WCT entered into force on 5 February 2009 year. '''Article 14 of the WCT''' (Provisions on Enforcement of Rights) obliges all States to follow the '''same principle'''. This is a key unifying moment (Russia and the United States). Countries may use different ways of adaptation of the Act in its territory, '''but they are related by one this rule (laid down in article 14)'''. DMCA-adaptation, but has own national adjustments and additions (all of these add-ons must have a respect from other countries parties to the WCT, and Russia including). Thus, I will make adjustments on our Web site, indicating that '''we act in accordance with the DMCA and the norm, which is the premier source in this legal context (article 14 of the WCT)'''. P.S. Unlike of large hostings which shift responsibility on their users (as written in the DMCA), we take that responsibility on self, because we don't have those, whom we can blame. Actually-not scary (public domain in my country). ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 10:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-08T03:16:36Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */They all (Russia and U.S.)

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

* They all (Russia and U.S.) are associated with international acts of WIPO & European Union, the Berne Convention (mutual obligations of countries). The most important: The Beatles in Russia long ago in the public domain !!!!!! ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 03:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-07T17:38:06Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hello! See:

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! See: http://beatles1.ru/Copyright_and_DMCA_Policy.html . You may tell for the English Wikipedia: no problems anymore. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-02T08:48:54Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */Hello! I am in shock.

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I am in shock. See: http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm . After all this they dare speak about smallest interests of different dirty companies. I toil for the benefit of all mankind, as stated on the page with documentation. Declaration of human rights is a recommendation, but exist many important international laws based on it. In these documents is that everyone has the right to participation in the culture, the freedom of information and so on. I am tired. I'll post the documents to the UN, UNESCO and the like on our site and let all these bureaucrats finally will not hinder progress . They go to war for all of humankind, depriving it of the rights which created half a century ago, the rights for opening of cultural values. Emi? What is it? Is nothing - empty place. Interests of all humanity & nothing more are important only. If somebody thinks not so - it means that he is enemy of all people in the world. About culture and Science: please tell for administrators of English Wikipedia - request for accommodation links in article The Beatles already exists. Let them put links. If this does not happen, I depart. And let the Beatles else 10 years waiting for the transition into the public domain. I am tired to struggle. Today i will put links to international laws about culture and sciense on our site. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-01T17:22:07Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did:

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks! I've read. What is the conclusion I did: The Library of Congress does not own any collections and works from the catalog and is basically a neutral position. Library writes that any man must make a written request to the author, if his actions exceed the good faith use which it must determine on their own. In the context of all this, I believe that my actions fall under fair use (my right - so assume, by my own inner conviction and I am convinced that I was right). Copyright law the U.S. does not gives the precise definitions of fair use, only principles, but the emphasis is on science and culture. These are two elements that accompany any of my step. So, when I think I'm fair user, this situation remains at least until the moment when the author decides to announce about this. I will place on the site the notice, which is usually placed on big hostings: (if you're right holder and believe that we have wronged you - please contact our agent). To comply with DMCA. Also, now I am reading info about the UNESCO. If you have any comments to my understanding of situation - please, write me about it. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 17:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-08-01T02:48:19Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hello! I have a question: which status......

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! I have a question: which status have films and music beginning from this page: http://www.loc.gov/film/index.html (in terms of copyright, including) ? -----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 02:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-27T18:34:06Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other.

== Welcome ==
Thanks for all the translation work you've been doing recently. I'm (sadly) a monolingual English speaker, so I can't review it in detail, but I'm glad to see it, nonetheless. Let me know if you need any pages deleted or other details cleaned up. Thanks! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 07:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry about the blocking problems. It should be resolved now. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, resolved. Thanks! [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 19:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the problem again. Let me know if it's not fixed. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. It was resolved in a day. Thanks Jesse. [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

== Translation of protected pages ==
Thanks for the note. I've been experimenting with adding a call to the Translations template like:
<nowiki>{{Translations|
{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Translations}}
}}</nowiki>

in [[Template:Protected]] but it hasn't been working. Maybe it's because I'm trying to transclude an unprotected page through an unprotected template into a protected page. I'll keep looking into it. [[User:Akozak|Akozak]] 17:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Spam linking to wikipedia? ==

In looking over the spam you (valiantly) cleaned up, I didn't notice any links to en.wikipedia.org -- since we do have a number of valid links there, which now prevent those pages from being edited by non-admins, could you tell me more about the spam you noticed that linked to wikipedia? [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 00:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Sure. The main concern was spam bots creating the likes of [[Ireland Traniee Apprentice Jobs It]], [[Provident Banks]], [[Principal Job Openings]], [[Nottingham University Job]], [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]], [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]], etc. There are dozens of those. In examining the contents, I found some reappearing URLs. Many, at the bottom of the contents, contained a link to wikipedia, such as the two at the end above, [[Bank In Lombard Suberbin West]] and [[Cooperative Bank Mortgage]]. So, the identified URLs were blacklisted, together with wikipedia to prevent future stuff of a similar nature. It's been some time now, and it may have calmed down, so this is probably a good time to remove all my additions from the blacklist and evaluate the current usefulness. -- [[User:Hamilton Abreu|Hamilton Abreu]] 00:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
::Makes sense. I'll just remove the wikipedia one, and we can see how things settle. Thanks again for stepping up while I was gone. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 08:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

== Looking for ways to share basic creative commons files ==
I am an editor for wikiHow.com and I share a lot of files that way and through Flickr, using CC. However, I don't want to put '''everything''' there. I am actually investigating ways and places to store them and will then do it and also write about it.

[[User:Ttrimm|Teresa Trimm]]

==Uploaded files==
Hamilton perchè è stata cancellata la mia pagina di file?
[[User:Ray1870|Ray1870]] 19:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

==Re: Uploaded file==
* Hi, Hamilton Abreu! When can I upload a file specifically? --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I understand you. I will create a wiki project later here. Thanks! --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 07:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* Ok, later will talk about this topic. It about The Beatles. In my Russia dark night now. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 23:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

* I created the page. If do not need to, i will delete files and page also. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* How to delete files? Or you can delete. --------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, i understand. They are already there. For attribution of the works of art. For example: http://beatles1.ru/with_the_beatles_album_1963/ ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thanks ! ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 05:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* Yes i do. The condition for the using of this kind of license. For the full rule of law. Major works at least. Great idea to bring the culture of the Beatles to the audience without this will not be able to be implemented. Because all the shivering from fear, when afraid to violate copyright. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

* It is for this reason are 2 ways (and good) for insurance. If there is not one of them, then another will come in handy. The license and attribution do everything legally anyway. By the way, the licence is the point where it is written that the "use license in no way affects your right to fair use, this means you can combine. About copyright laws in Russia, England and the USA: our Ministry of culture and the public domain in the documentation are only as one of the points of motivation (preamble), so no more references. Just show that the public domain is real, this reduces the moral sense to require respect for copyright. That's right: we have a public domain in England will begin in 2012, after 50 years since the first record. Obviously, this is about the album Please please me. And more: Copyright Office mentioned is not by chance, this VA-Bank, which was a success: the Office does not take any sanctions, this means that all legally. Because they know perfectly well that, at this site posted a link to them (source of traffic is displayed). Regarding fair use: a few items fulfilled 100 per cent: similar material already exists on any hosting, including Vimeo and Youtube which use the same license, by the way. Recording quality is not the DVD, and in the context of the global objectives of the interests of the right holder are negligible. Donate to culture The Beatles to the vast number of people making the right holder as grain in the vast sea. This is not fiction. In Russia The Beatles loved by millions of people, and around the world and we are trying to bring it up to people, irrespective of their material well-being and does not pursue commercial targets. 50 years since the advent of the ensemble, The Beatles had earned that their study, because it is a real phenomenon, wonder of the world. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons. In the moral sense, the Beatles long heritage of society as a whole. The pirates are looking for money, here everything is based on the desire to popularize the creativity (the antithesis to the notion of "spam"). How can there be-Commerce on the Beatles...., it make adult webmasters for example. I have own site for benefit recipients (laws on social welfare) and my partner - the world champion fighting without rules-Boloyangov Pavel (link exchange). Real Beatleman must deal with benefit, something bad is alien for him. Do you like the Beatles? ---[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* I am very glad that you like the Beatles! Provocative question: Vimeo and Youtube are copyright holders? They received permission from Apple Corps? I doubt it. This is the losses for corporation, setting a precedent (referring to these hostings, anyone can do the same, the more - "ShareAlike"). I am a lawyer by training. Next, we read an interesting excerpt: "All current CC licenses require that you attribute the original author(s). If the copyright holder has not specified any particular way to attribute them, this does not mean that you do not have to give attribution. It simply means that you will have to give attribution to the best of your ability with the information you do have. Generally speaking, this implies five things: ...." And it is - in relation to these words: "Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder". And "5 things" do not change the crux of the matter. By the way, not known - maybe it's already become a public domain anywhere (as in Russia). About this knows U.S. Copyright Office. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* In what sense? Many English phrases are difficult to translate. --[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer. Internet was not around. You can continue to give me advice if you wish, I do not mind. Was a little offended when you compared us with pirates. We are the same "pirates", like Youtube and Vimeo, (that is - not a pirates absolutely). I am a friend and sincerely believe that all the fans of The Beatles on the planet - brothers and sisters. Unlike other sites of this kind, our website is not for profit, at least it's not an end in itself. Main goal - to give the art of The Beatles for a lot of people, regardless of their financial well-being. It's inspiring. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hi! I can't understand only - why. We are the creators of the legal basis for using of the content (same creators, as these hostings). By the way, text about fair use will be delete, only leaving a link to the Office. Attribution was not in relation of small works and several major works, but it is will ok ( major works) very soon, material for the identification we will be look for. All albums received attribution. What does it mean: "copyright infringement"? You continue to insist that we are violating? ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 08:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram in the example of Youtube. We have compiled a description (for documentation), but has not yet translated it into English. We understand it so: Youtube and Vimeo have argued that the copyright owner has authorized the use of them by downloading the videos there and others were later to invoke this (choosing the license). Youtube shows off a device to identify the copyright holder, and also offers to read the crazy list of conditions if someone dares to say that his rights violated and so on…. . I caught the meaning of this . In our case copyright holder or user who got a license will not download content, but will send files by e-mail for us (in the sense, as in Youtube, only e-mail). Scenario further implies: after checking we insert file data in the html code and put on the site for the general public. From the documentation will also says that those who will send us a file via e-mail must to check: video on Youtube, Audio-on Jamendo, and photos on Flickr. Also invited to follow all the procedural steps (clicking on the link to the Youtube page Here: http://www.youtube.com/static?template=contentid&hl=en., http://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms&hl=en-GB, http://www.youtube.com/t/creative_commons, here: http://www.youtube.com/t/copyright_notice.
I will translate the text and put it today on the site. If you say to us that this is badly, then i will send links to content from Youtube and Vimeo for you (I very hope that will not have to do it - i think my schema is not worse than on Youtube). Moreover, procedural links will be there. I once again draw your attention to this: Rules of hosting will be used to our project, and about this will be written on the page with documentation. Will be the links to legal pages of Youtube and without reference to specific video files. -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Well, I understand. Remove all the things written (Flickr and others), but please leave the category: The Beatles Art For Free Use. Ok? Remove those pages now, to avoid confusion. I wanted make as better. If i was wrong, then I apologize. I will not more add links about the Beatles from other sites . I will send you links to content from Youtube and Vimeo, as you requested. Apology accepted? -------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you very much! Technique was broken, therefore I haven't accessed the Internet long time. By the way, which sites, in addition to Youtube and Vimeo, are authoritative sources? For better speed in the collecting of information. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 09:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* I have else the question. Can I write this text (see below) for category "The Beatles Art For Free Use", if so, then link for registration is correct?

 Please, add here your free The Beatles-resourse. If it under license of Creative Commons for lawfully, you must at first create your own page on this site after [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Main_Page <big>registration</big>]. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 16:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will write your wording for the category. And also i will look for international norms of copyright for justification of content on the site. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 00:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Okey, I will read those norms necessarily today. As it is difficult to give The Beatles for mankind for free ! I'll work to reach it. Millions of people cannot afford to buy the album "Beatles For Sale", to become more educated and cultural, for example. They have not a lot of money. Only for food and nothing more. Or not have a money absolutelly. Without a doubt, in this context, the interests of a corporation are negligible. I think sincerely so. And about this I will write in the documentation. ------[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 02:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok absolutelly. ----[[User:Master grand|Nowhere Man]] 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

* Hello! What do you know about caching of site in the context of copyright? I saw that the Italian Wikipedia uses this method: there is link to the cached site with video (on webcitation.org ). Only this site does not display anything, because webcitation.org not allowes to do this action (caching video and audio). It was not clear why Italians don`t want to deleted unhelpful link. But exist other methods for caching, if i not mistaken. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

* Thank you !. Another question: what does this term (exactly is in English!): "Copyright deposit print" ? Sorry, I'm not American - it would have been easier to understand. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

* I see. Thanks! I will read this information and other. Cannot do everything at once. On The Sly. I already closer to the truth. ----[[User:Master grand|Admin of Project]] 18:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-26T05:30:55Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Thank you !. Another question:

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-25T05:39:23Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */Hello! What do you know about caching

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-21T22:09:24Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */Unfortunately, this is so. But I will explore international norms and all will ok

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-21T02:59:18Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Okey, I will read those norms

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-21T00:29:26Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */Okey, I will write

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-20T16:04:51Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ I have else the question.

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-20T09:10:07Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Thank you very much! Technique was broken,

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-17T16:34:10Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */Well, I understand.

Category:Licensed

2011-07-17T07:42:15Z

Master grand: new category

[[Category:Licensing]]

Special:Badtitle/NS106:PAGE

2011-07-17T05:37:37Z

Master grand: Created page with "<noinclude> This is the "PAGE" form. To create a page with this form, enter the page name below; if a page with that name already exists, you will be sent to a form to edit that ..."

<noinclude>
This is the "PAGE" form.
To create a page with this form, enter the page name below;
if a page with that name already exists, you will be sent to a form to edit that page.

{{#forminput:form=PAGE}}

</noinclude><includeonly>
<div id="wikiPreview" style="display: none; padding-bottom: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"></div>
{{{for template|LIST}}}
{| class="formtable"
|}
{{{end template}}}

'''Free text:'''

{{{standard input|free text|rows=10}}}

{{{standard input|summary}}}

{{{standard input|minor edit}}} {{{standard input|watch}}}

{{{standard input|save}}} {{{standard input|preview}}} {{{standard input|changes}}} {{{standard input|cancel}}}
</includeonly>

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-17T04:55:14Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */I have a few hours ago examined the entire diagram

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-16T08:01:54Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Hi! I can't understand only - why.

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-14T06:36:33Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */Hi! Sorry, that long did not answer.

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-13T09:49:35Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ In what sense?

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-13T09:25:18Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ I am very glad

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-13T04:43:19Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ The pirates did not use the license Creative Commons.

Category:UCOP

2011-07-13T03:03:11Z

Master grand: created the category

[[Category:Education]]

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-13T02:39:19Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */It is for this reason

Category:Video

2011-07-12T18:02:31Z

Master grand: the category is created

[[Category:Media]]

[[Category:Art]]

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-12T16:08:52Z

Master grand: /* Re: Uploaded file */ Yes i do.

Category:Art

2011-07-12T10:45:21Z

Master grand: The category is created

[[Category:Education]]

[[Category:Media]]

[[Category:Film]]

Category:Education

2011-07-12T10:41:00Z

Master grand: The category is created

[[Category:OER Resources]]

Category:Audio

2011-07-12T10:14:59Z

Master grand: The category is created

[[Category:Media]]

Category:NonCommercial

2011-07-12T10:10:01Z

Master grand: The category is created

[[Category:Licensing]]

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-12T05:07:25Z

Master grand: /* Uploaded files */ Thanks !

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-12T05:00:34Z

Master grand: /* Uploaded files */ Okey, i understand. They are already there.

User talk:Hamilton Abreu

2011-07-12T04:42:48Z

Master grand: /* Uploaded files */ How to delete files?