<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Drini</id>
		<title>Creative Commons - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Drini"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Drini"/>
		<updated>2026-05-09T16:51:14Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&amp;diff=21971</id>
		<title>Talk:Content Directories</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&amp;diff=21971"/>
				<updated>2009-04-08T01:06:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drini: /* how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started an [http://saponaceo.us open soapmaking wiki] in which all content is Creative Commons licensed.  So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups.  I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site.  Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful.  I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it.  But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info.  If anyone can help, please help me.  People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site.  I'm not even running ads.  I work as a web developer.  This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing.  I have one other moderator.  There seems to be a trust disconnect.  Maybe there's just not enough information there yet.  Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com.  [http://mchrisneglia.info or find me here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started an [http://saponaceo.us open soapmaking wiki] in which all content is Creative Commons licensed.  So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups.  I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site.  Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful.  I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it.  But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info.  If anyone can help, please help me.  People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site.  I'm not even running ads.  I work as a web developer.  This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing.  I have one other moderator.  There seems to be a trust disconnect.  Maybe there's just not enough information there yet.  Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com.  [http://mchrisneglia.info or find me here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agnula Libre Music==&lt;br /&gt;
* Main URL: http://muzik.agnula.org/&lt;br /&gt;
* CC-only portal: almost everything is CC-licensed (some EFF OAL)&lt;br /&gt;
* CC-only feed: ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Formats: audio&lt;br /&gt;
* Size and scope of CC-licensed collection: ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed this from the article. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 21:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to ad a new section for this but I don't know how..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Website URLs? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. ''[[User:BlankVerse|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Blank&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[User talk:BlankVerse|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Verse&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'' 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'education' and 'geodata' are not content formats ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, at least education isn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the education and geodata queries -- they weren't working properly as those are not allowable values of [[Property:Format]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect we should have another property that education would be the value of (audience?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may want to add geodata as a format, but I'm not sure -- there are lots of other kinds of data, and licensing around any of them is controversial. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 03:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drini</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&amp;diff=21970</id>
		<title>Talk:Content Directories</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&amp;diff=21970"/>
				<updated>2009-04-08T01:06:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drini: /* how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started an [http://saponaceo.us open soapmaking wiki] in which all content is Creative Commons licensed.  So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups.  I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site.  Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful.  I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it.  But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info.  If anyone can help, please help me.  People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site.  I'm not even running ads.  I work as a web developer.  This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing.  I have one other moderator.  There seems to be a trust disconnect.  Maybe there's just not enough information there yet.  Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com.  [http://mchrisneglia.info or find me here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started an [http://saponaceo.us open soapmaking wiki] in which all content is Creative Commons licensed.  So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups.  I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site.  Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful.  I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it.  But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info.  If anyone can help, please help me.  People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site.  I'm not even running ads.  I work as a web developer.  This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing.  I have one other moderator.  There seems to be a trust disconnect.  Maybe there's just not enough information there yet.  Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com.  [http://mchrisneglia.info or find me here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
simuze and promocioname need to be re-added&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
openphoto.net?&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Insert formula here&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;HECTOR^+LOPEZ&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== agnula libre music has been down for months ==[[Image:Example.jpg]]GOOGLE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agnula Libre Music==&lt;br /&gt;
* Main URL: http://muzik.agnula.org/&lt;br /&gt;
* CC-only portal: almost everything is CC-licensed (some EFF OAL)&lt;br /&gt;
* CC-only feed: ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Formats: audio&lt;br /&gt;
* Size and scope of CC-licensed collection: ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed this from the article. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 21:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to ad a new section for this but I don't know how..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Website URLs? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. ''[[User:BlankVerse|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Blank&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[User talk:BlankVerse|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Verse&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'' 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'education' and 'geodata' are not content formats ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, at least education isn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the education and geodata queries -- they weren't working properly as those are not allowable values of [[Property:Format]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect we should have another property that education would be the value of (audience?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may want to add geodata as a format, but I'm not sure -- there are lots of other kinds of data, and licensing around any of them is controversial. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 03:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drini</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&amp;diff=21969</id>
		<title>Talk:Content Directories</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Content_Directories&amp;diff=21969"/>
				<updated>2009-04-08T01:05:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drini: /* agnula libre music has been down for months */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== how much content is needed for inclusion and how to promote a CC site?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started an [http://saponaceo.us open soapmaking wiki] in which all content is Creative Commons licensed.  So far I've had difficulty (and resistance) promoting it among the soapmaking community through Yahoo! groups.  I went about promoting it the wrong way, but there's no help from google or other search engines, even when you try really hard to find a free soapmaking content site.  Try as you might, it just doesn't have the 'pagerank' to be useful.  I think I might just continue to put content into it myself, and if it doesn't take off, I'll turn what I have at that point into a book and sell it.  But this of course defeats the purpose of CC licensed info.  If anyone can help, please help me.  People's response to me so far is that I have something to gain from hosting and trying to promote the site.  I'm not even running ads.  I work as a web developer.  This is supposed to be a build it and they will come type of thing.  I have one other moderator.  There seems to be a trust disconnect.  Maybe there's just not enough information there yet.  Please reply to mchrisneglia . at . yahoo.com.  [http://mchrisneglia.info or find me here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
simuze and promocioname need to be re-added&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
openphoto.net?&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Insert formula here&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;HECTOR^+LOPEZ&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== agnula libre music has been down for months ==[[Image:Example.jpg]]GOOGLE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agnula Libre Music==&lt;br /&gt;
* Main URL: http://muzik.agnula.org/&lt;br /&gt;
* CC-only portal: almost everything is CC-licensed (some EFF OAL)&lt;br /&gt;
* CC-only feed: ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Formats: audio&lt;br /&gt;
* Size and scope of CC-licensed collection: ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed this from the article. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 21:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to ad a new section for this but I don't know how..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Website URLs? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For any of the websites in the lists that have specific Creative Commons webpages or search forms, I think that the URL should be for that page, instead of the main page for the website. For example, for Flickr, the URL should be http://flickr.com/creativecommons/. ''[[User:BlankVerse|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Blank&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[User talk:BlankVerse|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Verse&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'' 06:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'education' and 'geodata' are not content formats ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, at least education isn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the education and geodata queries -- they weren't working properly as those are not allowable values of [[Property:Format]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect we should have another property that education would be the value of (audience?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may want to add geodata as a format, but I'm not sure -- there are lots of other kinds of data, and licensing around any of them is controversial. [[User:Mike Linksvayer|Mike Linksvayer]] 03:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drini</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>