<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=CidHighwind</id>
		<title>Creative Commons - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=CidHighwind"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/CidHighwind"/>
		<updated>2026-04-19T15:20:07Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Share_Alike&amp;diff=28276</id>
		<title>Talk:Share Alike</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Share_Alike&amp;diff=28276"/>
				<updated>2009-12-25T20:33:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CidHighwind: Created page with 'I hope this is the right place to ask for this... Could a paragraph be added to this article to clarify what exactly it means if content is published using a CC license that does…'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I hope this is the right place to ask for this... Could a paragraph be added to this article to clarify what exactly it means if content is published using a CC license that does '''not''' contain the &amp;quot;SA&amp;quot; clause?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, if content is licensed as CC-BY, can a derivative work be licensed as CC-BY-SA (thus &amp;quot;adding&amp;quot; a clause)? If content is licensed as CC-BY-NC, can a derivative work be licensed as CC-BY-SA (thus also &amp;quot;removing&amp;quot; a clause)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The layman reasoning here would be that, because of not explicitely stating that a derivative work needs to use the ''same'' license (=share-alike), it could use a ''similar'' one instead. If this can't be done, then what is the exact additional benefit of making &amp;quot;SA&amp;quot; explicit? -- [[User:CidHighwind|CidHighwind]] 20:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CidHighwind</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>