<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cabell</id>
		<title>Creative Commons - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cabell"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cabell"/>
		<updated>2026-04-24T13:44:43Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Europe/Meetings&amp;diff=54594</id>
		<title>Europe/Meetings</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Europe/Meetings&amp;diff=54594"/>
				<updated>2012-01-03T09:43:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cabell: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;All affiliates are encouraged to seek out each other for meetings and collaborations when participating in events (especially those listed last on this page which is of particular interest to Creative Commons affiliates). You can always ask on the European mailing list if someone else is going to a particular event!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During some occasions, when a more detailed discussion is useful between the affiliates, it can make sense to schedule a half day or day long meeting before or after a related event to have some time for the affiliates themselves to voice opinions and find constructive dialogue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Meeting planning&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The current tentative thinking for potential meetings:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;1st of May - One day session on the 4.0 process. Ties in with Re:publica in Berlin. - Includes participation from CC legal.&lt;br /&gt;
   &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Should we plan time for SGDR discussions in this, or is SGDR important enough to warrant a second meeting?&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Sometime around 20-22nd of June, a meetup on OER? &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Potentially with Cable Green&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Sometime around September 2012, a larger European regional meeting - &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Potentially with participation by Jessica Coates&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Proposed themes for regional meetings&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;4.0&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;SGDR&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;OER&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;GLAM&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Community Management&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Events of interest&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;LAPSI Thematic Network 2nd Public Conference, 23-24th of January 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;EPSIplatform Conference: Taking re-use to the next level!, 16th of March 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;LAPSI Thematic Seminar 6: Licensing of PSI: PSI-holders’ Perspectives, Re-users’ Perspectives and Redress Mechanisms, 22-23rd of March 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Open Courseware Consortium Global Meeting 2012, 16-18th of April 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Re:Publica, 2-4th of May 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Eurodig, 14-15th of June 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;World OER Congress, 20-22nd of June 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;LAPSI Internal Conference and final meeting, 9-10th of July 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;1st Global Thematic IASC Conference on the Knowledge Commons, 12-14th of September 2012&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cabell</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Government_adoption_strategies&amp;diff=53298</id>
		<title>Government adoption strategies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Government_adoption_strategies&amp;diff=53298"/>
				<updated>2011-10-18T20:36:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cabell: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CC for intergovernmental organizations at http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Intergovernmental_Organizations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://creativecommons.org/government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Introduction to CC&lt;br /&gt;
*CC's brief analysis regarding data at http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/26283 &lt;br /&gt;
*Overview of CC licenses at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/&lt;br /&gt;
*CC public domain tools at http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/&lt;br /&gt;
*Examples of governmental uses of CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Government_use_of_Creative_Commons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EU&lt;br /&gt;
*European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report: Creative Commons and Public Sector Information, Report no. 23 (published 11th February 2011), Authors: Timothy Vollmer and Diane Peters (CC) at http://epsiplatform.eu/content/topic-report-no-23-creative-commons-and-public-sector-information-flexible-tools-support-p-0&lt;br /&gt;
*European Commission, 2005, First evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases, DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/databases/evaluation_report_ en.pdf (showing that EU database creation had declined since introduction of the Directive, whilst it had continued to rise in the US, undermining the rationale for the right in the first place).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AU:&lt;br /&gt;
*Fitzgerald, Anne M., Hooper, Neale, &amp;amp; Fitzgerald, Brian F. (2010) The use of Creative Commons licensing to enable open access to public sector information and publicly funded research results : an overview of recent Australian developments. In Bourcier, Danièle, Casanovas, Pompeu, Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie, &amp;amp; Maracke, Catharina (Eds.) Intelligent Multimedia : Managing Creative Works in a Digital World. European Press Academic Publishing , pp. 151-174 at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/34143/.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fitzgerald, Anne M., Fitzgerald, Brian F., &amp;amp; Hooper, Neale (2010) Enabling open access to public sector information with Creative Commons Licences : the Australian experience. In Access to Public Sector Information : Law, Technology &amp;amp; Policy. Sydney University Press at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29773/. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada:&lt;br /&gt;
*CIPPIC has just released To Share or to Share-alike? a brief study that analyzes Share-Alike obligations in Canadian municipal open data portals, at http://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/CIPPIC%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Share-alike%20Obligations.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
England &amp;amp; Wales&lt;br /&gt;
*JISC Practical Guide to Licensing Open Data at http://discovery.ac.uk/files/pdf/Licensing_Open_Data_A_Practical_Guide.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
*JISC comparison of CC with OGL at http://www.jisclegal.ac.uk/ManageContent/ManageContent/tabid/243/ID/2047/Can-works-licensed-under-an-OGL-Open-Government-Licence-be-used-as-part-of-an-OER.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
*(2005): http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/knowledge_base/general_articles&lt;br /&gt;
*(2011) Digital Opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth (Hargreaves Report) May 2011 at http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
*(2011) HMG response to Hargreaves at http://www.info4local.gov.uk/documents/publications/1958983&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NL&lt;br /&gt;
**Studies in the NL (2007): http://www.ivir.nl/publications/eechoud/CC_PublicSectorInformation_report_v3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*New Zealand:&lt;br /&gt;
**New Zealand's State Services Commission on its information/data policies: http://ict.govt.nz/guidance-and-resources/information-and-data/nzgoal&lt;br /&gt;
**New Zealand Government Open Access and Licensing framework (NZGOAL): http://ict.govt.nz/programme/opening-government-data-and-information/nzgoal/development-nzgoal&lt;br /&gt;
***Open Government Information and Data Re-use Project -- Suggested All-of-government Approach to Licensing of Public Sector Copyright Works: Discussion Paper for Public Service ***and Non-Public Service Departments; and Summary and Analysis of Department Feedback (on the Discussion Paper).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Funder_Policies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cabell</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Government_adoption_strategies&amp;diff=53297</id>
		<title>Government adoption strategies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Government_adoption_strategies&amp;diff=53297"/>
				<updated>2011-10-18T20:35:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cabell: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CC for intergovernmental organizations at http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Intergovernmental_Organizations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://creativecommons.org/government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Introduction to CC&lt;br /&gt;
*CC's brief analysis regarding data at http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/26283 &lt;br /&gt;
*Overview of CC licenses at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/&lt;br /&gt;
*CC public domain tools at http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/&lt;br /&gt;
*Examples of governmental uses of CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Government_use_of_Creative_Commons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EU&lt;br /&gt;
*European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report: Creative Commons and Public Sector Information, Report no. 23 (published 11th February 2011), Authors: Timothy Vollmer and Diane Peters (CC) at http://epsiplatform.eu/content/topic-report-no-23-creative-commons-and-public-sector-information-flexible-tools-support-p-0&lt;br /&gt;
*European Commission, 2005, First evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases, DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/databases/evaluation_report_ en.pdf (showing that EU database creation had declined since introduction of the Directive, whilst it had continued to rise in the US, undermining the rationale for the right in the first place).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AU:&lt;br /&gt;
*Fitzgerald, Anne M., Hooper, Neale, &amp;amp; Fitzgerald, Brian F. (2010) The use of Creative Commons licensing to enable open access to public sector information and publicly funded research results : an overview of recent Australian developments. In Bourcier, Danièle, Casanovas, Pompeu, Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie, &amp;amp; Maracke, Catharina (Eds.) Intelligent Multimedia : Managing Creative Works in a Digital World. European Press Academic Publishing , pp. 151-174 at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/34143/.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fitzgerald, Anne M., Fitzgerald, Brian F., &amp;amp; Hooper, Neale (2010) Enabling open access to public sector information with Creative Commons Licences : the Australian experience. In Access to Public Sector Information : Law, Technology &amp;amp; Policy. Sydney University Press at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29773/. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada:&lt;br /&gt;
*CIPPIC has just released To Share or to Share-alike? a brief study that analyzes Share-Alike obligations in Canadian municipal open data portals, at http://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/CIPPIC%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Share-alike%20Obligations.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
England &amp;amp; Wales&lt;br /&gt;
*JISC Practical Guide to Licensing Open Data at http://discovery.ac.uk/files/pdf/Licensing_Open_Data_A_Practical_Guide.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
**JISC comparison of CC with OGL at http://www.jisclegal.ac.uk/ManageContent/ManageContent/tabid/243/ID/2047/Can-works-licensed-under-an-OGL-Open-Government-Licence-be-used-as-part-of-an-OER.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
**(2005): http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/knowledge_base/general_articles&lt;br /&gt;
**(2011) Digital Opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth (Hargreaves Report) May 2011 at http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
**(2011) HMG response to Hargreaves at http://www.info4local.gov.uk/documents/publications/1958983&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NL&lt;br /&gt;
**Studies in the NL (2007): http://www.ivir.nl/publications/eechoud/CC_PublicSectorInformation_report_v3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*New Zealand:&lt;br /&gt;
**New Zealand's State Services Commission on its information/data policies: http://ict.govt.nz/guidance-and-resources/information-and-data/nzgoal&lt;br /&gt;
**New Zealand Government Open Access and Licensing framework (NZGOAL): http://ict.govt.nz/programme/opening-government-data-and-information/nzgoal/development-nzgoal&lt;br /&gt;
***Open Government Information and Data Re-use Project -- Suggested All-of-government Approach to Licensing of Public Sector Copyright Works: Discussion Paper for Public Service ***and Non-Public Service Departments; and Summary and Analysis of Department Feedback (on the Discussion Paper).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Funder_Policies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cabell</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Category:Public_sector_information&amp;diff=53170</id>
		<title>Category:Public sector information</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Category:Public_sector_information&amp;diff=53170"/>
				<updated>2011-10-13T11:34:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cabell: Blanked the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cabell</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Category:Public_sector_information&amp;diff=53169</id>
		<title>Category:Public sector information</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Category:Public_sector_information&amp;diff=53169"/>
				<updated>2011-10-13T11:34:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cabell: Created page with &amp;quot;Government adoption resources&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Government adoption resources&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cabell</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Scholarship_and_critique_regarding_Creative_Commons&amp;diff=53167</id>
		<title>Scholarship and critique regarding Creative Commons</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Scholarship_and_critique_regarding_Creative_Commons&amp;diff=53167"/>
				<updated>2011-10-13T10:30:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cabell: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;These articles and comments have been collected to represent the different views about Creative Commons and issues related to Creative Commons.  If you know of an article or comment that is not represented here, please add it, or suggest on the talk page.  Articles and comments that are suitable for inclusion here are those which somehow progress and contribute to the debate that surrounds CC &amp;amp; CC-related issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General Articles and Comments Related to CC and CC Related Topics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2011===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Fewer, David.  Analysis of Share-Alike Obligations in Municipal Open Data Licenses. Canada: CIPPIC, 2011. [http://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/CIPPIC%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Share-alike%20Obligations.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2010===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Creative Commons Licenses Legal Pitfalls: Incompatibilities and Solutions.  Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law/Creative Commons Nederland, 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/101220cc_incompatibilityfinal.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Paul Keller (Creative Commons Nederland) &amp;amp; Andy Zondervan (Buma/Stemra). Evaluation of the Creative Commons Buma/Stemra pilot. Amsterdam/Hoofddorp, Augustus 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/100824evaluation_pilot_en.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2009===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Christina Angelopoulos. Creative Commons and Related Rights in Sound Recordings: Are the Two Systems Compatible? Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht, 2009. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/091201cc_sound_recordings.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Abelson Hal, Adida Ben, Linksvayer Mike, Yergler Nathan, ccREL: The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language, Communia First Workshop, Torino, January 2008. [http://www.communia-project.eu/node/79 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dobusch Leonhard, Quack Sigrid, “Epistemic Communities and Social Movements: Transnational Dynamics in the Case of Creative Commons,” MPIfG (Max-Planck Institute for the Study of Societies), Discussion Paper 08/8. [http://www.mpifg.de/pu/dp_abstracts/dp08-8.asp link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Check Your Data Freedom: Defining a Taxonomy for Access and Reuse of Life Science Data. Nature Precedings, July 2008. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2083.1 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2007===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*M.M.M. van Eechoud &amp;amp; B. van der Wal, “Creative commons licensing for public sector information: Opportunities and pitfalls“, Institute for Information Law, 2007. [http://www.ivir.nl/publications/eechoud/CC_PublicSectorInformation_report_v3.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mary Wai San Wong, ‘User-Generated Content &amp;amp; the Open Source/Creative Common Movements: Has the Time Come for Users' Rights?’ (2007) [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1022395 Link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2006===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Creative Commons Submission in response to the Questions for online consultation released in conjunction with the i2010 Digital Libraries Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions [SEC(2005) 1195].   [http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/consultation/replies/consult_results/cc_a302994.pdf   link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Digital Rights Management: Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Internet Group [http://www.apig.org.uk/current-activities/apig-inquiry-into-digital-rights-management/DRMreport.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Klang. Informational Commons: On creativity, copyright &amp;amp; licenses, Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Göteborg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hietanen Herkko, Dulong de Rosnay Melanie, « Legal Metadata for Semantic Web Applications: Case Creative Commons », Symposium on Digital Semantic Content across Cultures, Paris, the Louvre, May 2006. [http://www.seco.tkk.fi/events/2006/2006-05-04-websemantique/presentations/articles/hietanen-DulongdeRosnay-Legal-Metadata-for-Semantic-Web-Applications.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Remix World: towards a global digital commons [http://www.opendemocracy.net/arts-commons/issue.jsp link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Rens,  Managing Risk and Opportunity in Creative Commons Enterprises, First Monday, volume 11, number 6 (June 2006) [http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_6/rens/index.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wikipedia Entry on Creative Commons [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_commons link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kimberlee G. Weatherall, ‘Would you ''ever'' recommend a Creative Commons license?’(2006) Australasian Intellectual Property Resources [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/AIPLRes/2006/4.html Link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2005===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Two: The intellectual property system and freedom of expression and creativity. [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_two_the_intellectual_property#comment50 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society,  Theme Three: The public domain and open access models of information creation: at odds with the intellectual property system or enabled by it? [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_three_the_public_domain#comment53 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Niva Elkin-Koren, Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit, in Hugenholtz P. Bernt &amp;amp; Guibault Lucie (eds.), The Future of the Public Domain, Kluwer Law International, 2006. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mia Garlick, Creative Humbug? Bah the humbug, let’s get creative! By:Mia Garlick, Creative Commons, [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-print_article.php?articleId=124. link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mia Garlick, A Review of Creative Commons and Science Commons , [http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id=666&amp;amp;ID=ERM05510&amp;amp;bhcp=1. link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Andrea Gloriosoi,  gravi (o presunti tali) problemi delle CC, (&amp;quot;The  severe (or  so  believed) problems of CC [licenses]&amp;quot;) [http://punto-informatico.it/p.aspx?id=1275360 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*H. Hietanen &amp;amp; V. Oksanen, (2005) Legal metadata, open content distribution and collecting societies. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/legal_metadata_open_content.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Klang (2005). The Digital Commons: Using Licenses to Promote Creativity, Proceedings of Ethicomp. [http://www.ituniv.se/~klang/web/pub/Klangethicomp.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mako-Hill Benjamin, Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement, july 2005. [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Barker Ed, Duncan Charles, Guadamuz Andres, Hatcher Jordan, Waelde Charlotte, The Common Information Environment and Creative Commons. Final Report to the Common Information Environment Members of a study on the applicability of Creative Commons Licences, 10 October 2005, 39 p. [http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/knowledge_base/general_articles/creative_commons_licensing_solutions_for_the_common_information_environment__1 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2004===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Christiane Asschenfeldt, &amp;quot;Copyright and Licensing Issues—The International Commons.&amp;quot; In CERN Workshop Series on Innovations in Scholarly Communication: Implementing the Benefits of OAI (OAI3), 12 February-14 February 2004 at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: CERN, 2004. [http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00000998/  link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Brian Fitzgerald, Brian, and Ian Oi, &amp;quot;Free Culture: Cultivating the Creative Commons.&amp;quot; (2004). [http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00000122/ link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*N. Hendriks, (2004) Developing CC Licenses for Dutch Creatives. In Danièle Bourcier and Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay, editors, International Commons at the Digital Age, La création en partage, pages 19-32. Romillat, Paris, 2004. [http://fr.creativecommons.org/iCommonsAtTheDigitalAge.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Pawlo, (2004) What is the Meaning of Non-Commercial? in Bourcier D. &amp;amp; Dulong De Rosnay, M. (eds).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Välimäki, M. and H. Hietanen. (2004). The Challenges of Creative Commons Licensing, Computer Law Review, (06):172-177, Dec 2004. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/cri06-04_A_Vaelimaeki_Hietanen.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan B. Weitzman, and Lawrence Lessig. &amp;quot;Open Access and Creative Common Sense.&amp;quot; Open Access Now, 10 May 2004. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/archive/?page=features&amp;amp;issue=16 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2003===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Out of the Way: How the Next Copyright Revolution Can Help the Next Scientific Revolution.&amp;quot; PLoS Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 30-31. [http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&amp;amp;doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0000009 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, The Creative Commons, RBL, Tokyo (2003). (No online link available at this time). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Barbara F. Schloman,&amp;quot;Creative Commons: An Opportunity to Extend the Public Domain.&amp;quot; Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13 October 2003. [http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/infocol/info_12.htm link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gary Stix, &amp;quot;Some Rights Reserved.&amp;quot; Scientific American 288, no. 3 (2003): 46. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&amp;amp;colID=7&amp;amp;articleID=000C2691-4F88-1E40-89E0809EC588EEDF link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2002===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*D.C.  Denison,  &amp;quot;For Creators, An Argument for Alienable Rights.&amp;quot; Boston Globe, 22 December 2002, E2. (No online link available at this time). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hal  Plotkin, &amp;quot;All Hail Creative Commons: Stanford Professor and Author Lawrence Lessig Plans a Legal Insurrection.&amp;quot; SFGate.com, 11 February 2002. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/02/11/creatcom.DTL link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Books Related to CC and CC Related Topics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2010===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Danièle Bourcier, Pompeu Casanovas, Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Catharina Maracke (editors), (2010). Intelligent Multimedia. Sharing Creative Works in a Digital World, European Press Academic Publishing, Florence, June 2010, 412 p. ISBN: 9788883980633. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CCiBook_printedversion_IntelligentMultimedia1.pdf link to pdf] - [http://www.e-p-a-p.com/publications/bookcard.php?isbn=9788883980633 link to table of contents]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2006===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yochai Benkler, (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300110561. [http://www.benkler.org/wealth_of_networks/index.php/Download_PDFs_of_the_book. link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2005===&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric von Hippel, (2005). Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0262002744. [http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ.htm link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, (2005). Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. New York: Penguin. ISBN 9780143034650. [http://www.free-culture.cc/freeculture.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Kembrew McLeod, (2005). Freedom of Expression (R) : Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0385513259. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2004===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Danièle Bourcier, Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay (editors), (2004). International Commons at the Digital Age/La création en partage. Paris: Editions Romillat. ISBN  2878940814. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/livre.pdf link to book pdf] - [http://creativecommons.fr/activite/httpccfr-dechelle-netactivitepublications/international-commons-at-the-digital-age/ link to table of contents] (NB. At the time this book was prepared, iCommons referred to the international licensing project currently known as Creative Commons International)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2001===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House. ISBN 0375505784. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Kembrew McLeod, (2001). Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law (Popular Culture and Everyday Life). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. ISBN 0820451576. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1999===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, (1999). Code, and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 046503912X.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1997===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*James Boyle (1997). Shamans, Software, and SpleensL Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674805232.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Law Journal Articles about CC and CC Related Topics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2011===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Herkko Hietanen, “Creative Commons Olympics. How Big Media is Learning to License From Amateur Authors” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-1-2011/2963 Link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Catherine Jasserand, “Creative Commons licences and design: Are the two compatible?” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-2-2011/3085 Link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2010===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Catharina Maracke “Creative Commons International: The International License Porting Project” (2010) 1 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-1-2010/2417 Link] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2009===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Chen Shun-ling, “To Surpass or to Conform – What are Public Licenses For?”, University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology &amp;amp; Policy, Issue 1, 2009, 107–139.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bas Bloemsaat &amp;amp; Pieter Kleve, ‘Creative Commons: A business model for products nobody wants to buy’ (2009) 23(3) International Review of Law, Computers &amp;amp; Technology 237&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer, &amp;quot;The New Servitudes&amp;quot; . Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028947&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2007===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Carroll, “Creative Commons as Conversational Copyright,” Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2007-8, in Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age, YU Peter K. (Ed.), Vol. 1, New York: Praeger, 2007, 445–61. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=978813 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hietanen Herkko, “A License or a Contract, Analyzing the Nature of Creative Commons Licenses,” NIR Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd (Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review), 2007/6, 76, 516–535. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1029366 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Pallas Loren, Lydia, &amp;quot;Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright&amp;quot; . George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 271, 2007 [http://ssrn.com/abstract=957939 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jessica Coates, ‘Creative Commons - The Next Generation: Creative Commons licence use five years on’ (2007) 4 SCRIPT-ed (1) 72  [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol4-1/coates.asp Link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2006===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Séverine Dusollier, The Master's Tools v. The Master's House: Creative Commons v. Copyright, Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, vol. 29, Spring 2006, p. 101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Andres Guadamuz Gonzalez, Open Science: Open Source Licenses in Scientific Research, 7 N.C. J.L. &amp;amp; Tech. 321(2006).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Zachary Katz, Pitfalls of Open Licensing: An Analysis of Creative Commons Licensing, 46 IDEA 391 (2006).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael W. Carroll, ‘Creative Commons and the New Intermediaries’ (2006) 45 Michigan State Law Review [http://ssrn.com/abstract=782405 Link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2005===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Jerry Brito and Bridget Dooling, An Orphan Works Affirmative Defense to Copyright Infringement Actions, 12 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 75 (2005) [http://www.mttlr.org/voltwelve/brito&amp;amp;dooling.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Niva Elkin-Koren, What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitiating A Creative Commons, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 375 (November 2005). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence B. Solum,Book Review : The Future of Copyright Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. By Lawrence Lessig, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1137 (2005). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Matthew Dean Stratton, Will Lessig Succeed in Challenging the CTEA, Post-Eldred?, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media &amp;amp; Ent. L.J. 893 (Spring, 2005).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2004===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Anupam  Chander and Sunder, Madhavi,  The Romance of the Public Domain, 92 Calif. L. Rev. 1331 (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, Commentary: The Creative Commons, 65 Mont. L. Rev. 1 (Winter, 2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, Free(ing) Culture for Remix, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 961 (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert P. Merges, A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 183 (Winter 2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Christopher Sprigman, Reform(aliz)ing Copyright,  57 Stan. L. Rev. 485 (November, 2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2003===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeffrey L. Harrison, Creativity or Commons: A Comment on Professor Lessig, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 795 (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawrence Lessig, Dunwoody Distinguished Lecture in law: The Creative Commons, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticisms of/Debate About Creative Commons &amp;amp; CC-related issues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2006===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI), MEMORANDUM ON CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSES, [http://www.alai-usa.org/Memo%20Creative%20Com%20Licences%20jg%20rev%2022%20jan.doc link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Australian Copyright Council, Information Sheet: Creative Commons Licenses, May 2006. [http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets_pdf/g094.pdf/download link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Niva Elkin-Koren, &amp;quot;Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit&amp;quot; . THE FUTURE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, P. Bernt Hugenholtz &amp;amp; Lucie Guibault, eds., Kluwer Law International, 2006 Available at SSRN: [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mihály Ficsor, &amp;quot;How Did We Arrive Here? The Evolution of Copyright Legislation (the End of?), [http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/B.1%20M.%20Ficsor_tcm6-43830.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Becky Hogge, &amp;quot;What Moves a Movement,&amp;quot; [http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-commons/movement_3686.jsp link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2005===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) position on CC, [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/forms_and_guidelines/creative_commons.asp link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*D. M.  Berry, &amp;amp; Giles Moss, “On the ‘Creative Commons’: a critique of the commons without commonalty,” Free Software Magazine. No. 5., [http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_05/commons_without_commonality link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*D. M.  Berry, &amp;amp; Giles Moss,&amp;quot;Libre Commons = Libre Culture + Radical Democracy. [http://www.noemalab.org/sections/ideas/ideas_articles/berry_moss_libre_commons.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*John C. Dvorak,“Creative Commons Humbug,” PC Magazine, [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1838251,00.asp link], Dvorak's revised position on CC:  [http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/10/27/dvorak-recants-on-creative-commons-humbug/  link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Sarah Faulder, &amp;quot;What Creative Commons really means for writers,&amp;quot; [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons_writers.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Fitzgerald, &amp;quot;Copyleft Hits a Snag,&amp;quot; [http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16073&amp;amp;ch=infotech link]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Benjamin Mako Hill, &amp;quot;Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement,&amp;quot; [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Geert Lovink and Ned Rossiter, &amp;quot;Dawn of the Organised Networks,&amp;quot; FibreCulture Journal Issue 5, [http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/lovink_rossiter.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA)'s Media Release: &amp;quot;AFC provides no Sanctuary for Australian performers,&amp;quot; [http://modfilms.com/archives/doc/20050330_meaa_pressrelease.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Erik Möller, &amp;quot;The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License,&amp;quot; [http://intelligentdesigns.net/Licenses/NC link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Raymond Nimmer, “Open source license proliferation, a broader view,&amp;quot; [http://www.ipinfoblog.com/archives/licensing-law-issues-36-open-source-license-proliferation-a-broader-view.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Andrew Orlowski, “On Creativity, Computers and Copyright,&amp;quot; The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/21/creativity/ link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Andrew Orlowski, &amp;quot;The Commons Just Isn't Creative,&amp;quot; The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/29/creativity_computers_copyright_letters/ link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Pike, &amp;quot;What you need to know about Creative Commons,&amp;quot; [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons.pdf link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Pike, &amp;quot;Let's be Clear about Creative Commons,&amp;quot; Sound Nation. [http://www.bmr.org/html/news/news55.htm link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Evan Prodromou, &amp;quot;debian-legal Summary of Creative Commons 2.0 Licenses,&amp;quot; [http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Response of Australian Performing Rights Association (APRA) to Creative Commons International,  Regarding the Application of APRA for Authorization, [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+64474.pdf&amp;amp;trimFileTitle=D05+64474.pdf&amp;amp;trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]&lt;br /&gt;
**Creative Commons International's First Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+61451.pdf&amp;amp;trimFileTitle=D05+61451.pdf&amp;amp;trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]&lt;br /&gt;
**Creative Commons Internationals' Second Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+70075.pdf&amp;amp;trimFileTitle=D05+70075.pdf&amp;amp;trimFileFromVersionId=744729   link]&lt;br /&gt;
**filed as part of the Australian Competition &amp;amp; Consumer Commission's consideration of the Australian Performing Rights Association's application for Authorisation of its input &amp;amp; output arrangements. All documents can be found here: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/744728/display/submission. link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Richard Stallman, Position on Creative Commons: [http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/entry-20050920.html here] and [http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/07/1733220 here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Péter Benjamin Tóth, “Creative Humbug: Personal feelings about the Creative Commons licenses,&amp;quot; [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=118 link]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cabell</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>