<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Brian+Rowe</id>
		<title>Creative Commons - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Brian+Rowe"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Brian_Rowe"/>
		<updated>2026-05-10T03:21:05Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Mozilla_Service_Week&amp;diff=25951</id>
		<title>Mozilla Service Week</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Mozilla_Service_Week&amp;diff=25951"/>
				<updated>2009-09-04T22:14:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Tuesday, September 15, 2009 */ added Brian to Tuesday&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding:1.25em 1em; -moz-border-radius:5px; -webkit-border-radius:5px; background-color: #eaeaea; overflow: auto; margin-bottom:2em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mozilla Service Week is an opportunity for people to help others learn more about their area of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;[[#I Want To Help!|I Want To Help!]]&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;[[#I Need Help!|I Need Help!]]&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mozilla Service Week is September 14-21, 2009. From [http://mozillaservice.org/learn_more/index/en_US their website]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;What Is Mozilla Service Week?&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;During the week of September 14-21, 2009, we're asking individuals to step up and make a difference by using the Web to better their community. We're looking for people who want to share, give, engage, create, and collaborate by offering their time and talent to local organizations and people who need their help.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Mozilla believes everyone should know how to use the Internet, have easy access to it, and have a good experience when they're online. By utilizing our community's talents for writing, designing, programming, developing, and all-around technical know-how, we believe we can make the Web a better place for everyone.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an organization that shares those values and ideals, Creative Commons is answering Mozilla's call for participation by hosting an online help desk via our [[IRC]] channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CC help desk is a place for experienced CC-ers (staff, Jurisdiction partners, and community members), to come together to share their collective expertise with those that are new to CC and need a little, or a lot, of guidance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CC community will be providing help with the following topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* General CC help&lt;br /&gt;
* CC technology (ccREL and software projects)&lt;br /&gt;
* Where and how to publish CC works&lt;br /&gt;
* Where and how to find CC works&lt;br /&gt;
* CC in education and science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= I Need Help! =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you're new to CC or just have questions about one of the topics above you can get help by joining the [[IRC]] channel during Service Week.  Refer to the list of [[#Volunteers|volunteers]] below if you're not sure who in the channel to ask.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== But I don't know what IRC is! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC IRC] page in Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[IRC] is a form of real-time Internet text messaging (chat)... mainly designed for group communication in discussion forums, called channels.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has a dedicated room, [[IRC|#cc]], on the [http://freenode.net Freenode Network].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC Software ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't currently use IRC, Wikipedia has a helpful [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IRC_clients list of applications].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Linux Users ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have lots of options; [http://xchat-gnome.navi.cx/ X-Chat Gnome] is one of them.  If you have a favorite, add a link here!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mac OS X Users ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://colloquy.info/ Colloquy] is an IRC client for Mac OS X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Windows Users ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* X-Chat is available at http://www.silverex.org/download/&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mirc.com/ mIRC] was awesome in 1995. Maybe it still is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= I Want To Help! =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have time to help out, you can participate by spending time in the channel answering questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add your name to the schedule below and join the channel during your scheduled day.  You don't need to block out time, you can just leave it running in the background and look periodically to answer questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add your name and IRC nick below to the days you can help out and don't forget to register and [http://mozillaservice.org/tell_us/your_pledge/ pledge your hours] at the [http://mozillaservice.org Mozilla Service] website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Volunteers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people below (with their IRC nick names in parenthesis) have volunteered to help out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monday, September 14, 2009 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Yergler (nathany) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Kozak (akozak) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Kinkade (nkinkade) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Grossmeier (greg-g) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aurelia J. Schultz [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fred Benenson (mecredis) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* John Doig (JED3) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parker Phinney (pyrak) [Former CC Intern]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tuesday, September 15, 2009 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Yergler (nathany) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Kozak (akozak) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Kinkade (nkinkade) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Grossmeier (greg-g) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aurelia J. Schultz [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* John Doig (JED3) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parker Phinney (pyrak) [Former CC Intern]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brian Rowe (sarterus) [Former CC Intern]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Wednesday, September 16, 2009 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Yergler (nathany) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Kozak (akozak) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Kinkade (nkinkade) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Grossmeier (greg-g) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aurelia J. Schultz [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* John Doig (JED3) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parker Phinney (pyrak) [Former CC Intern]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Thursday, September 17, 2009 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Yergler (nathany) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Kozak (akozak) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Kinkade (nkinkade) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Grossmeier (greg-g) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Michelle Thorne [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* John Doig (JED3) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parker Phinney (pyrak) [Former CC Intern]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Friday, September 18, 2009 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Yergler (nathany) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Kozak (akozak) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Kinkade (nkinkade) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Grossmeier (greg-g) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aurelia J. Schultz [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* John Doig (JED3) [CC Staff]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parker Phinney (pyrak) [Former CC Intern]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18441</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18441"/>
				<updated>2008-08-15T22:51:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] or other public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:400px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 This is a new FAQ question and answer: added August 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18436</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18436"/>
				<updated>2008-08-15T22:44:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */  removing cc0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] or other public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:400px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 This is a new FAQ question and answer: added August 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18434</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18434"/>
				<updated>2008-08-15T22:44:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] or other public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:400px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 This is a new FAQ question and answer: added August 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18430</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18430"/>
				<updated>2008-08-14T23:38:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:400px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 This is a new FAQ question and answer: added August 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18428</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18428"/>
				<updated>2008-08-14T21:17:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 This is a new FAQ question and answer: added August 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18411</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18411"/>
				<updated>2008-08-13T15:45:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 This is a new FAQ question and answer: added August 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18410</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18410"/>
				<updated>2008-08-13T15:42:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This answer is new and undergoing edits August 13th 2008 (status: formatting of table in progress)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licenses allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons-licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18409</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18409"/>
				<updated>2008-08-13T15:40:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This answer is new and undergoing edits August 13th 2008 (status: formatting of table in progress)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licences allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopaedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons-licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18408</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18408"/>
				<updated>2008-08-13T15:39:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 13th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This answer is new and undergoing edits August 13th 2008 (status: formatting of table in progress)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licences allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopaedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons-licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
| Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18407</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18407"/>
				<updated>2008-08-13T15:38:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''This is the full/extended version of the FAQ. It has a lot of information, and may be difficult to navigate.  You may want to first take a look at the [[FFAQ | abbreviated FAQ]], which answers a handful of the most common questions people have about Creative Commons.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BSD/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work  (ie a derivative work or adaptation), which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for derivative works or adaptations or adding the work to a collective work using CC-licensed material. The blank rows for the by-nc-nd and by-nd licenses indicate that new works cannot be made from material under these licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any qualifying purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 8th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I’m collecting a number of different works together into one resource. Can I include Creative Commons-licensed material? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This answer is new and undergoing edits August 13th 2008 (status: formatting of table in progress)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the Creative Commons licences allow the original work to be included in collections such as anthologies, encyclopaedias and broadcasts. However, you still have to follow the license the original material is under. For example, material under any of the Creative Commons Noncommercial licenses cannot be included in a collection that is going to be used commercially. The table below will help you work out whether you can include the Creative Commons-licensed material in your collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when you include a Creative Commons-licensed work in a collection, you must keep the work under the same license. This doesn’t mean the whole collection has to be put under the Creative Commons license – just the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
| Licenses that can be used for derivative work or adaptation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || Original Work ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18393</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18393"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T20:00:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Open Data */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public. 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open Data=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Database public domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: Long license too long to place here&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikimedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Public domain assertion tool stating jurisdiction and reason the work is in the public domain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikipedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Pubic domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: short simple text nonlegal wording.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case this is not legally possible,&lt;br /&gt;
I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18392</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18392"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:58:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Wikipedia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public. 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open Data=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Database public domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: Long license to  long to place here&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikimedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Public domain assertion tool stating jurisdiction and reason the work is in the public domain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikipedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Pubic domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: short simple text nonlegal wording.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case this is not legally possible,&lt;br /&gt;
I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18391</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18391"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:57:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Open Data */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public. 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open Data=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Database public domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: Long license to  long to place here&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikimedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Public domain assertion tool stating jurisdiction and reason the work is in the public domain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikipedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Pubic domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: short simple text nonlegal wording.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18390</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18390"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:55:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Open fonts */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public. 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open Data=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Database public domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikimedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Public domain assertion tool stating jurisdiction and reason the work is in the public domain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikipedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Pubic domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: short simple text nonlegal wording.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18389</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18389"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:54:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open Data=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Database public domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikimedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Public domain assertion tool stating jurisdiction and reason the work is in the public domain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikipedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Pubic domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: short simple text nonlegal wording.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18388</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18388"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:50:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open Data=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Database public domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikimedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Public domain assertion tool stating jurisdiction and reason the work is in the public domain&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Wikipedia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: Pubic domain dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: short simple text nonlegal wording.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18387</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18387"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:42:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Library of Congress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and other rights holders (such as holders of publicity and /or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Note that there may be U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in these materials. However, the Library is not aware of any copyrights or other rights associated with this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with any person intending to use an item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See our Legal Notices and Privacy and Publicity Rights for additional information and restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credit Line: Library of Congress, General Collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917)) Example work in public domain with link to generic  copyright disclaimer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18386</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18386"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:35:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Open fonts */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site: Public Domain Fonts is a small website that makes all work avalible to the public.   This site is typical in the way it uses an informal public domain dedication to grant works to the public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: 2 line dedication no legal text simple to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Public Domain Fonts]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18385</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18385"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:18:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: MusOpen */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open education photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Photo site of public domain photos, government works.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm Teach Politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Old Books===&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Exclassics is a website dedicated to older books that use to be considered classics but are no longer widely read.  As an example, The Newgate Calendar is a moral reader from the 1850's and is clearly in the PD, there is no mention of copyright on most pages or on the images.  The site does contain a basic copyright disclaimer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
No-Copyright notice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site and its contents are public domain and free to the world. Anything in it may be copied and distributed free of charge or obligation. We expect this policy to be passed on - anyone who copies our texts or web pages and tries to claim copyright for themselves is stealing - not from us, but from you, and from everyone.=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm Exclassics Newgate Calendar] , [http://www.exclassics.com Exclassics main page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Open fonts ===&lt;br /&gt;
URL: http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18384</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18384"/>
				<updated>2008-08-11T19:01:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* In progress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Community: MusOpen ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD.  Mus open takes music that is in the public Domain and has artists record the music granting all right to the public.  There contracts are undergoing revision.  They are interested in an easy way to ensure that the recording right make it to the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Musopen is an online music library of copyright free music (public domain music). We want to give the world access to music, without the legal hassles so common today. There is a great deal of music that has expired copyrights, but almost no recordings of this music is in the public domain. We aim to record or obtain recordings that have no copyrights so that our visitors may listen, re-use, or in any way enjoy music. Put simply, our mission is to set music free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.musopen.com/about.html Mus Open]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are provided in two sizes and in JPEG format for easy retrieval and use. The small size averages 400 pixels in the long dimension and 100k while the &amp;quot;full size&amp;quot; averages 1200 pixels in the long dimension and 320k. Note that the file sizes are rather large for JPEGs. Low compression was used so that these images could be edited and recompressed by the end user. As a result, download times will be slow with 56k modem access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images can be located through the browse/search page. Links to images contain brief captions and are listed in approximate chronological order.  Browse and search links connect to pages with a small image and additional descriptive information. Clicking on the small image loads the full sized version of the image. Either sized image may be saved to disk. Small image pages also include &amp;quot;VCR&amp;quot; buttons as an additional browsing option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are very briefly described with captions, and in some cases with more detailed descriptions and keywords on the small image page. Some captions/descriptions are directly quoted from the original, especially where usage is obsolete or the caption is highly slanted. No attempt is made in this collection to provide the historical context or interpretation of the relevance of these images. Rather, they are supplied as raw material for user already familiar with their importance to U.S. political history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Newgate Calendar, Clear PD no mention of copyright on images page.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18360</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18360"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T23:43:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* In progress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Library of Congress=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Clear PD item 1917, generic text telling users that the work may be in copyright&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))]&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are provided in two sizes and in JPEG format for easy retrieval and use. The small size averages 400 pixels in the long dimension and 100k while the &amp;quot;full size&amp;quot; averages 1200 pixels in the long dimension and 320k. Note that the file sizes are rather large for JPEGs. Low compression was used so that these images could be edited and recompressed by the end user. As a result, download times will be slow with 56k modem access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images can be located through the browse/search page. Links to images contain brief captions and are listed in approximate chronological order.  Browse and search links connect to pages with a small image and additional descriptive information. Clicking on the small image loads the full sized version of the image. Either sized image may be saved to disk. Small image pages also include &amp;quot;VCR&amp;quot; buttons as an additional browsing option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are very briefly described with captions, and in some cases with more detailed descriptions and keywords on the small image page. Some captions/descriptions are directly quoted from the original, especially where usage is obsolete or the caption is highly slanted. No attempt is made in this collection to provide the historical context or interpretation of the relevance of these images. Rather, they are supplied as raw material for user already familiar with their importance to U.S. political history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Newgate Calendar, Clear PD no mention of copyright on images page.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18359</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18359"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T23:41:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Text: &lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are provided in two sizes and in JPEG format for easy retrieval and use. The small size averages 400 pixels in the long dimension and 100k while the &amp;quot;full size&amp;quot; averages 1200 pixels in the long dimension and 320k. Note that the file sizes are rather large for JPEGs. Low compression was used so that these images could be edited and recompressed by the end user. As a result, download times will be slow with 56k modem access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images can be located through the browse/search page. Links to images contain brief captions and are listed in approximate chronological order.  Browse and search links connect to pages with a small image and additional descriptive information. Clicking on the small image loads the full sized version of the image. Either sized image may be saved to disk. Small image pages also include &amp;quot;VCR&amp;quot; buttons as an additional browsing option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are very briefly described with captions, and in some cases with more detailed descriptions and keywords on the small image page. Some captions/descriptions are directly quoted from the original, especially where usage is obsolete or the caption is highly slanted. No attempt is made in this collection to provide the historical context or interpretation of the relevance of these images. Rather, they are supplied as raw material for user already familiar with their importance to U.S. political history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Newgate Calendar, Clear PD no mention of copyright on images page.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18358</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18358"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T23:40:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
* put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
* sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
* use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright.  &lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are provided in two sizes and in JPEG format for easy retrieval and use. The small size averages 400 pixels in the long dimension and 100k while the &amp;quot;full size&amp;quot; averages 1200 pixels in the long dimension and 320k. Note that the file sizes are rather large for JPEGs. Low compression was used so that these images could be edited and recompressed by the end user. As a result, download times will be slow with 56k modem access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images can be located through the browse/search page. Links to images contain brief captions and are listed in approximate chronological order.  Browse and search links connect to pages with a small image and additional descriptive information. Clicking on the small image loads the full sized version of the image. Either sized image may be saved to disk. Small image pages also include &amp;quot;VCR&amp;quot; buttons as an additional browsing option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are very briefly described with captions, and in some cases with more detailed descriptions and keywords on the small image page. Some captions/descriptions are directly quoted from the original, especially where usage is obsolete or the caption is highly slanted. No attempt is made in this collection to provide the historical context or interpretation of the relevance of these images. Rather, they are supplied as raw material for user already familiar with their importance to U.S. political history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Newgate Calendar, Clear PD no mention of copyright on images page.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18357</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18357"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T23:39:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* In progress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Government work, no copyright.  &lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/ NOAA website with PD note]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are provided in two sizes and in JPEG format for easy retrieval and use. The small size averages 400 pixels in the long dimension and 100k while the &amp;quot;full size&amp;quot; averages 1200 pixels in the long dimension and 320k. Note that the file sizes are rather large for JPEGs. Low compression was used so that these images could be edited and recompressed by the end user. As a result, download times will be slow with 56k modem access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images can be located through the browse/search page. Links to images contain brief captions and are listed in approximate chronological order.  Browse and search links connect to pages with a small image and additional descriptive information. Clicking on the small image loads the full sized version of the image. Either sized image may be saved to disk. Small image pages also include &amp;quot;VCR&amp;quot; buttons as an additional browsing option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are very briefly described with captions, and in some cases with more detailed descriptions and keywords on the small image page. Some captions/descriptions are directly quoted from the original, especially where usage is obsolete or the caption is highly slanted. No attempt is made in this collection to provide the historical context or interpretation of the relevance of these images. Rather, they are supplied as raw material for user already familiar with their importance to U.S. political history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Newgate Calendar, Clear PD no mention of copyright on images page.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18356</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18356"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T20:46:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | New Licenses or Uses Available&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question was recently updated: August, 8th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18355</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18355"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T18:14:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvements for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; | New Licenses or Uses Available&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18354</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18354"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:43:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* In progress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
Note: No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm&lt;br /&gt;
Images of American Political History. Posting online by Dr. William J. Ball. All images are believed to be in the public domain. Please do not contact me for permission to use them&lt;br /&gt;
Using the Collection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intent of this collection is to support the teaching of American political history by providing quick access to uncopyrighted images for inclusion in teaching materials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are provided in two sizes and in JPEG format for easy retrieval and use. The small size averages 400 pixels in the long dimension and 100k while the &amp;quot;full size&amp;quot; averages 1200 pixels in the long dimension and 320k. Note that the file sizes are rather large for JPEGs. Low compression was used so that these images could be edited and recompressed by the end user. As a result, download times will be slow with 56k modem access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images can be located through the browse/search page. Links to images contain brief captions and are listed in approximate chronological order.  Browse and search links connect to pages with a small image and additional descriptive information. Clicking on the small image loads the full sized version of the image. Either sized image may be saved to disk. Small image pages also include &amp;quot;VCR&amp;quot; buttons as an additional browsing option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Images are very briefly described with captions, and in some cases with more detailed descriptions and keywords on the small image page. Some captions/descriptions are directly quoted from the original, especially where usage is obsolete or the caption is highly slanted. No attempt is made in this collection to provide the historical context or interpretation of the relevance of these images. Rather, they are supplied as raw material for user already familiar with their importance to U.S. political history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Newgate Calendar, Clear PD no mention of copyright on images page.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngillus.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
http://tulrich.com/fonts/&lt;br /&gt;
Public Domain fonts&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any purpose, please go ahead.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18353</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18353"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:42:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community:Open Clipart */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ basic license embedded in page footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
contract ? email&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18352</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18352"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:41:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community:LibriVox */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox (audio recordings of PD books)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
contract ? email&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18351</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18351"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:40:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Educational */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
* Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
* Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
contract ? email&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18350</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18350"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:39:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Educational */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
contract ? email&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18349</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18349"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:38:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Educational */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
    Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
    License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
    Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
    Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
contract ? email&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18348</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18348"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:37:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Internet archive */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
    Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
    Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
    License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
    Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
    Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org Many different sections including moving images, audio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
XXX&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/broll/&lt;br /&gt;
NOAA maintains a library of video footage, which is compiled and categorized by subject. It’s available for the cost of reproduction on a public domain basis — no license or clearance required. It’s requested that you credit “NOAA” or “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” when using the footage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
Library of Congress - http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/spaldingbib:@field(TITLE+@od1(Spalding%27s+official+base+ball+guide,+1917))&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly PD item, 1917, rights link leads to a generic copyright disclamer page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
xxx&lt;br /&gt;
musopen.com&lt;br /&gt;
No license just one sentence on PD&lt;br /&gt;
contract ? email&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18347</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18347"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:35:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:Open Clipart=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC-PD for all art work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the website has a footer that claims work is in the public domain and a few mentions of public domain in the FAQ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text: The clip art on this website and part of this project are released into the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://www.openclipart.org/ footer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Educational=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
    Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
    Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
    License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
    Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
    Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org moving images, audio]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18346</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18346"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:25:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Community: Internet archive */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community: Educational &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
    Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
    Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
    License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
    Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
    Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://Internetarchive.org moving images, audio]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18345</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18345"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:23:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool used: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/ full text of disclaimer and PD policies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community: Educational &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
    Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
    Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
    License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
    Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
    Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355 Link to tool, explanation of need and community discussion relating to the tool]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community: Internet archive===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tool: CC-PD dedication&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: the current PD dedication is used to mark both text that are pre 1923 and recent works submitted by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http;//Internetarchive.org moving images, audio]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18344</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18344"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T10:09:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community that uses:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community:LibriVox===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: CC public domain dedication with additional warning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
LibriVox recordings are in the public domain, which means people can do anything they like with them. Mostly this just means people can listen to them for free. But it also means they can: sell them (for instance on ebay), broadcast them, put them in commercials, play them at political rallies, chop them up, remix them, make music recordings of them. The recordings are free, and there is no need to credit LibriVox, although of course we much prefer if you do credit us (with a link to our site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some other examples of what people might do (and would have the right to do) with our recordings (and, if your record for us, your recordings):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * make CDs of Romance of Rubber sold as a fundraiser for a charity you don’t like;&lt;br /&gt;
    * put Origin of the Species as background atmosphere for a pornographic film;&lt;br /&gt;
    * sample Fables for the Frivolous in a violent rap song;&lt;br /&gt;
    * use the summary of Frankenstein to promote a major motion picture; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although these examples are far-fetched, they are all acceptable uses of public domain materials. So be aware of what you are doing when you free your recordings and text into the public domain. You really have to let go!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL: [http://librivox.org/public-domain/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community that uses: Educational PD dedication draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool: http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: This tool has been abandoned &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
    Open Education License Draft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Draft 0.9, August 8, 2007. This is a draft document and is not yet intended for use.&lt;br /&gt;
    Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    The OpenContent Foundation is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. Distribution of this license does not create an attorney-client relationship. The OpenContent Foundation provides this information on an “as-is” basis. The OpenContent Foundation makes no warranties regarding the information provided, and disclaims liability for damages resulting from its use.&lt;br /&gt;
    License&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to exercise any and all rights in the Work for which You would require a license under current, applicable law, including (but not limited to) the rights to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        * Reuse the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it&lt;br /&gt;
        * Rework, alter, or transform the work so that it better meets your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Remix and combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs&lt;br /&gt;
        * Redistribute the verbatim work, the altered work, or the remixed work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties in writing, licensor offers the work as-is and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the work, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence of absence of errors, whether or not discoverable. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so such exclusion may not apply to you.&lt;br /&gt;
    Limitation on Liability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Except to the extent required by applicable law, in no event will licensor be liable to you on any legal theory for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages arising out of this license or the use of the work, even if licensor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.&lt;br /&gt;
    Termination&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:[http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community that uses:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community that uses:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18343</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18343"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:36:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvements for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18342</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18342"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:33:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporate CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18341</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18341"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:31:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporated CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18340</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18340"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:25:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ public domain dedication] , CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporated CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18339</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18339"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:24:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = public domain dedication, CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporated CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18338</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18338"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:22:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
*by = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Attribution only]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NoDerivatives]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial]&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-sa/3.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike] &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution-ShareAlike]&lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = public domain dedication, CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporated CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18337</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18337"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:08:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*by = Attribution only&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = Attribution-NoDerivatives &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = Attribution-NonCommercial &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd-sa = Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = Attribution-ShareAlike &lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = public domain dedication, CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporated CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above chart only displays which licenses are, as a practical matter, compatible. It is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18336</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18336"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T09:06:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* I used part of a Creative Commons-licensed work, which Creative Commons license can I relicense my work under? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work to create a new work, which Creative Commons license can I use for my new work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use on your new work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green = license available for making derivative works, adaptations or adding the work to a collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || New ||Licenses || or Uses || Available || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Original Work || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || CC0-pd ||Commercial Collected Work || NonCommercial Collected Work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| CC0 - pd || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:green;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abbreviation Key &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*by = Attribution only&lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd = Attribution-NoDerivatives &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc-nd = Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nc = Attribution-NonCommercial &lt;br /&gt;
*by-nd-sa = Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike &lt;br /&gt;
*by-sa = Attribution-ShareAlike &lt;br /&gt;
*CC0-pd = public domain dedication, CC0 or public domain work &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair use note: CC Licenses do not change, alter, or modify fair use rights. &lt;br /&gt;
You may still use fair use rights to incorporated CC works for any &lt;br /&gt;
qualifying purpose&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above chart only displays which licenses are, as a practical matter, compatible. It is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ question is under going improvement for better formatting and wording, last updated August, 8th 2008, status incomplete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18335</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18335"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T06:32:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist anyone with enforcing Creative Commons licenses. We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help site that offers free form-based legal documents for you to use however you see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I used part of a Creative Commons-licensed work, which Creative Commons license can I relicense my work under?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use to relicense a work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below shows blackened cells to indicate licenses that can be used without complication to relicense work licensed under license noted at beginning of each row. To see what license a work that incorporates works under multiple licenses can use, see which columns are filled in for all relevant rows. Thus, for example, if you are using work issued under an Attribution-NonCommercial license, you may be able to relicense it under either another Attribution-NonCommercial license or or one of Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs and NonCommercial-SamplingPlus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || nc-sampling+ || publicdomain || sampling+&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| nc-sampling+ || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| sampling+ || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| publicdomain || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above chart only displays which licenses are, as a practical matter, incompatible. It is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18334</id>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&amp;diff=18334"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T05:21:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Can I use a Creative Commons license for software? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Translations|&lt;br /&gt;
   articles=Hr:FAQ&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Note: '''Creative Commons does not provide legal advice'''. This FAQ is designed to be helpful in raising awareness about the use of our licenses. It is not a substitute for legal advice. It may not cover important issues that affect you and you may wish to consult with a lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about applying a Creative Commons license to their work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I apply a Creative Commons® license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For online works, you apply a Creative Commons license to a work by [http://creativecommons.org/license/ selecting the license that suits your preferences]. Once you have selected your license, and if you are applying it to an online work, follow the instructions to include the html code in your work. This code will automatically generate the “Some Rights Reserved” button and a statement that your work is licensed under a Creative Commons license, or a “No Rights Reserved” button if you choose to dedicate your work to the public domain. The button is designed to act as a notice to people who come in contact with your work that your work is licensed under the applicable Creative Commons license. The html code will also be include the metadata that enables your work to found via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I apply a Creative Commons license to an offline work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. For offline works, you should identify which Creative Commons license you wish to apply to your work and then mark your work either: (a) with a statement such as “This work is licensed under the Creative Commons [insert description] License. To view a copy of this license, visit [insert url]; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.” or insert the applicable license buttons with the same statement and URL link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between applying a Creative Commons license to an offline work and applying it to an online work is that offline works will not include the metadata and, consequently, will not be identified via [http://search.creativecommons.org Creative Commons-customized search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How does a Creative Commons license operate?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is based on copyright. So they apply to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio &amp;amp; visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just [http://creativecommons.org/license/ select your license at our ‘Choose License’ page].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What things should I think about before I apply a Creative Commons license to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have set out some things that you should think about before you apply a Creative Commons license to your work [[Before Licensing|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Which Creative Commons license should I choose?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should choose the license that meets your preferences. The license is a statement as to what others may do with your work, so you should select a license that matches what you are happy for others to do with your work. You can find [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses an overview of the Creative Commons licenses here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find out information about how our licenses have been applied by other people to [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists] and/or review the discussion archives to see if our community is able to respond to your questions and concerns and/or has already addressed them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, you can also consult with a lawyer to obtain advice on the best license for your needs. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What if I change my mind?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. So you need to think carefully when choosing a Creative Commons license to make sure that you are happy for people to be using your work consistent with the terms of the license, even if you later stop distributing your work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to sign something or register to obtain a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses are designed to be applied to your work and to be binding upon people who use your work based on their notice of the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” (or “No Rights Reserved” in the case of the public domain dedication) button and the statement that the work is Creative Commons-licensed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not keep track of or a register of which creative works have been licensed under a Creative Commons license. We make the licenses, code and tools available for you to use or not as you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is the Commons Deed? What is the legal code? What does the html/metadata do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commons Deed is a summary of the key terms of the actual license (which is the Legal Code)—basically, what others can and cannot do with the work. Think of it as the user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath. This Deed itself has no legal value, and its contents do not appear in the actual license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legal Code is the actual license; a document designed to be enforced in a court of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metadata describes the key license elements that apply to a piece of content to enable discovery through [http://search.creativecommons.org CC-enabled search engines].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am in a band; can I use Creative Commons licenses but still collect statutory royalties such as under statutory licenses for public performances?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, so long as you choose a “NonCommercial” license option (ie. Attribution-NonCommercial, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike or Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) because under these licenses you reserve the right to collect royalties under statutory or compulsory licenses for commercial use of your work. Whether, as a practical matter, you can collect these royalties, depends on which country you are in (check out the answer to the next question).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Creative Commons licenses that permit other people to make commercial use of your work (ie. Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NoDerivatives), the licensor waives the right to collect these royalties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I am a member of a collecting society, can I use Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to check with your society. Currently, many of the collecting societies in Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain, Taiwan and the Netherlands take an assignment of rights (or in France what is called a “mandate” of rights that nonetheless has the same effect practically as an assignment) from you in present and future works (so that they effectively become the owner of these rights) and manage them for you. So if you are already a member of a collecting society in one of these jurisdictions, you may not be entitled to license your work yourself under a Creative Commons license because the necessary rights are not held by you but by the collecting society. Please also read the FAQ on the website of the Creative Commons project team for your jurisdiction for more information about this issue in your jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons is reaching out to collecting societies in those jurisdictions where this problem arises to try to find a solution that enables creators to enjoy the benefits both systems offer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you encounter difficulties with using Creative Commons licenses because of your membership in a collecting society in your jurisdiction that is not listed above, please let either your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team] know or email info@creativecommons.org. Also, if you wish to discuss ways to try to deal with the situation in your country please contact your country’s Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project team]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are already a member of one of these collecting societies, feel free to encourage your collecting society to give you the option of Creative Commons licensing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright. To make one thing clear that is sometimes misunderstood: the &amp;quot;noncommercial use&amp;quot; condition applies only to others who use your work, not to you (the licensor). So if you choose to license your work under a Creative Commons license that includes the “noncommercial use” option, you impose the ”noncommercial” condition on the users (licensees). However, you, the creator of the work and/or licensor, may at any time decide to use it commercially. People who want to copy or adapt your work, &amp;quot;primarily for monetary compensation or financial gain&amp;quot; must get your separate permission first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing to note on the noncommercial provision: under current U.S. law, file-sharing or the trading of works online is considered a commercial use -- even if no money changes hands. Because we believe that file-sharing, used properly, is a powerful tool for distribution and education, all Creative Commons licenses contain a special exception for file-sharing. The trading of works online is not a commercial use, under our documents, provided it is not done for monetary gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most jurisdictions, registration is not required. However, for creators in the United States registration can be obtained and is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page, which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I register my copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are based in the US, to find out more about how to register your copyright, check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is applying a Creative Commons license to my work the same or an alternative to registering the copyright to my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Applying a Creative Commons license to your work does not give you the same, similar or alternate protection to registering your copyright. Creative Commons licenses apply in addition to and on top of an existing copyright. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need to register my copyright in order to use a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Creative Commons licenses apply to works that are copyrighted. As a general rule, in most jurisdictions, copyright protection is automatic for those works that satisfy the requirements of copyright law. Generally, copyright attaches to creative and expressive works once they are fixed in tangible form, ie. the minute you put pen to paper, brush to easel, hit the “save” button on your computer, the “send” button on your email or take a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For U.S. based creators, registering your copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office is advisable so that you can enforce your copyright in court. For US-based creators, you should check out the U.S. Copyright Office’s ‘[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#cr Copyright Basics]’ page which explains more about copyright registration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do I need a copyright notice to protect my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do not need to apply a copyright notice to secure copyright protection. However, a copyright notice can be useful because it clearly signals to people that you believe you own copyright in your work and who to contact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Do Creative Commons licenses affect fair use, fair dealing or other exceptions to copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. All jurisdictions allow some uses of copyrighted material without permission, such as quotation, current-affairs reporting, or parody, although these vary from country to country. These are not dependent on the license and so cannot be affected by it. To make this clear, all of our licenses include this or similar language: “Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use, first sale or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws.” Thus, regardless of the jurisdiction a user is in, our licenses do not affect a user’s right to use or allow use of content under copyright exceptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I use a Creative Commons license for software?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do not recommend it. Creative Commons licenses should not be used for software. We strongly encourage you to use one of the very good software licenses which are already available. We recommend considering licenses made available by the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation] or listed at the [http://www.opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative]. Unlike our licenses, which do not make mention of source or object code, these existing licenses were designed specifically for use with software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons has “wrapped” some free software/open source licenses with a human-readable &amp;quot;Commons Deed&amp;quot; and machine-readable metadata.  You may use these &amp;quot;wrapped&amp;quot; software licenses to take advantage of the Creative Commons human-readable document as well as the machine-readable metadata while still licensing your work under an established software license.  It is important to note that CC has not altered these software licenses in any way, but has simply bundled human- and machine-readable explanations of the licenses along with the original license text.  Examples: [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl/ GNU GPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl/ GNU LGPL], [http://creativecommons.org/license/bsd/ BSD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: August, 7th 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Should I use Creative Commons licenses for software documentation?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely. Creative Commons licenses work well for all text materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens when a copyright owner says her work is governed by two different Creative Commons licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a user, you can choose to use the work under either license. Generally, a licensor that offers the same work under two different licenses gives the public a choice between them. If, for example, a photograph is governed by one license with a NonCommercial provision, plus a separate license with a NoDerivatives provision, it does not mean that both provisions apply together. If an owner wants both to apply together, she should be sure to choose a single license that contains both provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Are Creative Commons licenses enforceable in a court of law?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Creative Commons Legal Code has been drafted with the intention that it will be enforceable in court. That said, we can not account for every last nuance in the world's various copyright laws and/or the circumstances within which our licenses are applied and Creative Commons-licensed content is used. Please note, however, that our licenses contain &amp;quot;severability&amp;quot; clauses -- meaning that, if a certain provision is found to be unenforeceable in a certain place, that provision and only that provision drops out of the license, leaving the rest of the agreement intact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons help me enforce my license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, Creative Commons is not permitted to provide legal advice or legal services to assist you with enforcing the licenses. We cannot afford to provide any ancillary services particular to your situation and, in any case, our mission does not include providing such services.  We are not a law firm. We're much like a legal self-help press that offers form documentation -- at no cost -- for you to use however you see fit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if you are based in the US, you may be able to find a suitably qualified volunteer lawyer in your area from [http://www.starvingartistslaw.com/help/volunteer%20lawyers.htm this site]. If you are based in Australia, the [http://www.artslaw.com.au/ Arts Law Centre of Australia] may be able to put you in touch with a volunteer lawyer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone misuses my Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license terminates automatically if someone uses your work contrary to the license terms. This means that, if a person uses your work under a Creative Commons license and they, for example, fail to attribute your work in the manner you specified, then they no longer have the right to continue to use your work. This only applies in relation to the person in breach of the license; it does not apply generally to the other people who use your work under a Creative Commons license and comply with its terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have a number of options as to how you can enforce this; you can consider contacting the person and asking them to rectify the situation and/or you can consider consulting a lawyer to act on your behalf. For information about how you may be able to locate a suitably qualified lawyer, please refer to [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Will_Creative_Commons_help_me_enforce_my_license?|this question and answer]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I don’t like the way a person has used my work in a derivative work or included it in a collective work; what can I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you do not like the way that a person has made a derivative work or incorporated your work into a collective work, under the Creative Commons licenses, you may request removal of your name from the derivative work or the collective work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the copyright laws in most jurisdictions around the world (with the notable exception of the US) grant creators “moral rights” which may provide you with some redress if a derivative work represents a “derogatory treatment” of your work. Moral rights give an original author the right to object to “derogatory treatment” of their work; “derogatory treatment” is typically defined as “distortion or mutilation” of the work or treatment, which is “prejudicial to the honor, or reputation of the author.” All Creative Commons licenses (with the exception of Canada) leave moral rights unaffected. This means that an original author may be able to take action against a derivative work that infringes the moral right that protects against derogatory treatment. Of course, not all derivative works that a creator does not like will be considered “derogatory.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions for people thinking about using a Creative Commons-licensed work===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will Creative Commons give me permission to use a work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The permission isn’t ours to give. Creative Commons simply makes available licenses and tools to enable creators and licensors to license their works on more flexible terms. By applying a Creative Commons license to a work, the creator or licensor has decided to clearly signal to members of the public, such as you, that you may use the work without having to ask for permission—provided that you use it consistent with the license terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons determine what content is released under its licenses?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons, as an organization, does not control how the licenses are used and does not check or verify whether a Creative Commons license has been correctly applied to a particular work.  Creative Commons does not endorse or certify any use of its licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, Creative Commons provides the licenses as a tool that may be adopted (or not) by members of the creative community.  Creative Commons does not determine whether the use of the licenses is appropriate for your situation or for a particular work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What are the terms of a Creative Commons license?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key terms of the core suite of Creative Commons licenses are: Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives and ShareAlike. These license elements are succinctly described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Attribution.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your copyrighted work, as long as they give you credit the way you request. All CC licenses contain this property. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NonCommercial.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, perform, and remix your work for non-commercial purposes only. If they want to use your work for commercial purposes, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''ShareAlike.''' You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work, as long as they only distribute them under the same Creative Commons license that your original work was published under. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''NoDerivatives.''' You let people copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work — not make derivative works based on it. If they want to alter, transform, build upon, or remix your work, they must contact you for permission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an overview of our licenses and links to the Commons Deed and Legal Code, check out [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So “NonCommercial” means that the work cannot be used commercially?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite. The “NonCommercial” license option means that you do not receive the commercial rights via the Creative Commons license. You can always approach the licensor directly to see if they will separately license you the commercial rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What does the Creative Commons “Some Rights Reserved” button mean? What does a Creative Commons license do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Creative Commons license is a signal to you that you can use the work without having to seek out the individual creator or licensor and ask for permission—provided you use the work in the manner permitted by the Creative Commons license. The Commons Deed sets out the key terms governing your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if I want to make a different use of the work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to use a Creative Commons-licensed work in a manner that is not permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons license, you need to contact the creator and/or licensor and ask for their permission. If you use a Creative-Commons licensed work contrary to the terms of the Creative Commons license, your right to use the work terminates and you could be sued for infringement of copyright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====So I don’t have to pay to use Creative Commons-licensed works if I comply with the license terms?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a general rule yes—Creative Commons licenses are made available under royalty-free licenses. In the case of Creative Commons-licensed works that are licensed for NonCommercial use only, the creator or licensor reserves the right to collect statutory royalties or royalties under compulsory licenses for commercial uses such as those collected for public performances; so, you may still have to pay a collecting society for such uses of Creative Commons licensed works. However, these are indirect payments, not payments to the licensor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I use a Creative Commons-licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come across a work that says it is made available under a Creative Commons license, you are authorized by the licensor to use it consistent with those license terms.  You should satisfy yourself that the scope of the license covers your intended uses.  Since there are a number of versions of the Creative Commons licenses, you should read the particular license carefully to ensure that the license meets your needs.  All Creative Commons licenses require that you attribute the author, licensor and/or any other parties specified by the author/licensor. To correctly use a Creative Commons licensed work, you must provide proper attribution. This is explained in [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work?|the answer below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get an understanding of the key terms of the license, check out the Commons Deed for the license and/or review [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses this page], which has links to the Commons Deed and basic explanations of all of our licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====When are publicity rights relevant?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity rights allow individuals to control how their voice, image or likeness is used for commercial purposes in public. These rights are relevant to any work that contains human subjects, such as photographs, audio or video interviews, plays, songs, and other spoken or visual content. When transmitting this sort of content, including the voices or images of anyone other than yourself, you may need to get permission from those individuals if you are using their voice or images for commercial purposes. This is a distinct and separate obligation from obtaining the copyright license, which only gives you a license from the author (or photographer) but not from the subjects. A Creative Commons license does not waive or otherwise affect the publicity rights of subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Podcasting Legal Guide has further discussion of [[Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Publicity_Rights_Issues|publicity rights issues]] of general relevance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does using a Creative Commons-licensed work give me all the rights I need?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should be aware that all of the licenses contain a disclaimer of warranties, so there is no assurance whatsoever that the licensor has all the necessary rights to permit reuse of the licensed work.  The disclaimer means that the licensor is not guaranteeing anything about the work, including that she owns the copyright to it, or that she has cleared any uses of third-party content that her work may be based on or incorporate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical of so-called “open source” licenses, where works are made widely and freely available for reuse at no charge.  The original version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses contained a warranty, but we ultimately concluded that, as with “open source” licenses, warranties and indemnities are best determined separately by private bargain, so that each licensor and licensee can determine the appropriate allocation of risk and reward for their unique situation.  One option thus would be to use private contract to obtain a warranty and indemnification from the licensor, although it is likely that the licensor would charge for this benefit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the warranty disclaimer, before using a Creative Commons licensed work, you should satisfy yourself that the person has all the necessary rights to make the work available under a Creative Commons license.  You should know that if you are wrong, you could be liable for copyright infringement based on your use of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should learn about what rights need to be cleared and when a fair use or fair dealing defense may be available.  It could be that the licensor is relying on the fair use or fair dealing doctrine, but depending on the circumstances, that legal defense may or may not actually protect her (or you). You should educate yourself about the various rights that may be implicated in a copyrighted work, because creative works often incorporate multiple elements such as, for example, underlying stories and characters, recorded sound and song lyrics.  If the work contains recognizable third-party content, it may be advisable to independently verify that it has been authorized for reuse under a Creative Commons license.  If the work contains images, voices, or likenesses of people, educate yourself about [[#When are publicity rights relevant?|publicity rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this is that you should always use your informed good judgment, and you may want to obtain legal advice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How do I properly attribute a Creative Commons licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using a work licensed under one of our core licenses, then the proper way of accrediting your use of a work when you're making a verbatim use is: (1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the URL for the work if applicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also need to provide the URL for the Creative Commons license selected with each copy of the work that you make available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are making a derivative use of a work licensed under one of our core licenses, in addition to the above, you need to identify that your work is a derivative work, ie. “This is a Finnish translation of the [original work] by [author]” or “Screenplay based on [original work] by [author].”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further recommendations and guidelines for marking works can be found at [[Marking|the CC Marking project]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is a derivative work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivative work is a work that is based on another work but is not an exact, verbatim copy. What this means exactly and comprehensively is the subject of many law journal articles and much debate and pontification. In general, a translation from one language to another or a film version of a book are examples of derivative works. Under Creative Commons’ core licenses, synching music in timed-relation with a moving image is considered to be a derivative work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's important to note, however, that the Creative Commons licenses allow the user to exercise the rights permitted under the license in any format or media, even in the NoDerivatives licenses. This means that, under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, for example, you can copy the work from a digital file to a print file consistent with the terms of that license.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====If I use a Creative Commons-licensed work with other works, do I have to Creative Commons license everything else as well?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of those of our licenses that contain the ShareAlike element, the Creative Commons licenses do not require everything else to be Creative Commons licensed as well. We specifically designed the Creative Commons licenses so that they would not turn all other works they were combined with into being Creative Commons-licensed. If you combine any work with a Creative Commons-licensed work that is licensed with a ShareAlike license provision, then, because of the way that the ShareAlike license element operates, the resultant work will need to be licensed under the same license as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include a Creative Commons licensed work in a “collective work” (ie. a collection of works in their exact original format, not adaptations), then you only need to continue to apply the Creative Commons license to that work (even if the work was licensed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license provision). You do not need to apply it to the entire collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I combine two different Creative Commons licensed works? Can I combine a Creative Commons licensed work with another non-CC licensed work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally yes; you can combine one Creative Commons licensed work with another Creative Commons licensed work or with another work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one big caveat is for Creative Commons licenses that contain the ShareAlike license element (ie. Attribution-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). These licenses require derivative works (ie. the result of two combined works) to be licensed under the same license elements. So, you cannot, for example, combine an Attribution-ShareAlike license with an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. If you are combining a work licensed under a ShareAlike license condition, you need to make sure that you are happy and able to license the resulting work under the same license conditions as the original work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I used part of a Creative Commons-licensed work, which Creative Commons license can I relicense my work under?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below should give you some assistance in figuring out which Creative Commons license you can use to relicense a work. Some of our licenses just do not, as practical matter, work together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chart below shows blackened cells to indicate licenses that can be used without complication to relicense work licensed under license noted at beginning of each row. To see what license a work that incorporates works under multiple licenses can use, see which columns are filled in for all relevant rows. Thus, for example, if you are using work issued under an Attribution-NonCommercial license, you may be able to relicense it under either another Attribution-NonCommercial license or or one of Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs and NonCommercial-SamplingPlus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:600px;&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;nbsp; || by || by-nc || by-nc-nd || by-nc-sa || by-nd || by-sa || nc-sampling+ || publicdomain || sampling+&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nc-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-nd || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| by-sa || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| nc-sampling+ || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| sampling+ || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| publicdomain || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; || style=&amp;quot;background-color:black;&amp;quot; | &amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above chart only displays which licenses are, as a practical matter, incompatible. It is not a substitute for obtaining your own legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or represented as legal advice. As explained above, Creative Commons is not able to provide you with legal advice. You need to independently assess which Creative Commons license is suitable for your requirements and your obligations to upstream licensors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Questions=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to give users of my site the option to choose Creative Commons licensing; how do I do that?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can directly integrate the Creative Commons license selection engine into your site. This can be useful if you have an application or website that allows people to contribute content and you want to give them the option to apply Creative Commons licenses to their works. Here is a [http://creativecommons.org/technology/web-integration step-by-step guide] on how to integrate our license selection engine with a website.  We also have a [http://api.creativecommons.org web services API] for integration with any application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Why did Creative Commons choose to use the RDF format for its metadata?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons looked for the best way to express the intent behind the licenses in machine-readable form. We feel that our system provides the best of all possible worlds: RDF, XML, and even plain text-based tools can easily process our metadata files because we provide them with a structured format. But just as XML tools make it easier to process the information than text-based ones, RDF ones make it even easier -- so we encourage all of our developers to use RDF tools where possible. We're also working with the community to provide CC sample code, in many different languages, that shows how easy it is to take advantage of the RDF information. We're also open to providing converters from RDF to other formats. If you have such a tool or would like one, please send information about it to our metadata list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====How can I use Creative Commons metadata in my program?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can use it in a variety of ways. A painting, writing, or drawing program could let its users know about their rights granted by the licensor of the file. File sharing software could highlight files with Creative Commons licenses and encourage users to download them. In fact, we see peer-to-peer file sharing software as an excellent distribution mechanism for Creative Commons works, especially large music, picture, and movie files that the authors might not have the bandwidth or tools necessary to distribute themselves. Search systems could allow users the choice of only searching for files with licenses that permit certain uses (such as searching for pictures of cats that you can include in your non-commercial collage). There are many ways to take advantage of this information and we hope the developer community will surprise us by coming up with others!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I'd prefer to use a PNG image instead of a GIF image or vice versa. What should I do?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We provide older license buttons in both formats.  Change, e.g., [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.gif somerights20.gif] to [http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights20.png somerights20.png] or vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newer license buttons that include license property icons are only available in PNG format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions about using Creative Commons’ logo===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where can I get a high resolution version of the Creative Commons logos?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can get high resolution versions of the Creative Commons logos and license buttons [http://creativecommons.org/presskit here]. Creative Commons only authorizes the use of our logos, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to print out some t-shirts &amp;amp; stickers with Creative Commons logos; how do I go about doing this?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We’re glad you are excited about Creative Commons and want to spread the message. We only authorize use of our logo, name and license buttons in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies], ie. to linkback to the Creative Commons website, a Creative Commons license and/or otherwise describe a Creative Commons license that applies to a work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can support Creative Commons and purchase t-shirts and stickers via our [http://support.creativecommons.org/store store]. In addition, movies about Creative Commons are available for download [http://support.creativecommons.org/videos here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I want to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into my site or work, can I?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are welcome to incorporate the Creative Commons logos into your site or work if you do so in accordance with our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page]. Basically, we only authorize use of the Creative Commons corporate logo (that is the name Creative Commons and the “CC” in a circle) to link back to our website; and our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons as well as our license element buttons (ie. the Attribution license button, the NonCommercial license button etc.) to be used to link back to our respective licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Can I change the Creative Commons logos so that they look better on my site or with my work?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don’t change our logo so that it works better with the look of your site or work. Our “Some Rights Reserved” and “No Rights Reserved” buttons need to be used consistently because they are our trademark and a core part of our licensing system. You can also use the license elements buttons that are in black and white to signal that your work or site is licensed under the relevant Creative Commons license; this is also explained at our [http://creativecommons.org/policies policies page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===About Creative Commons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons against copyright?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright and manage your copyright in a more flexible, open way. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the &amp;quot;promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts.&amp;quot; We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators or licensors fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons building a database of licensed content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely not. We believe in the Net, not an information bank controlled by a single organization. We are building tools so that the semantic web can identify and sort licensed works in a distributed, decentralized manner. We are not in the business of collecting content, or building databases of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, to give you an idea of the sorts of uses that can be made of our licenses and metadata, we've provided some examples on our site for [http://creativecommons.org/text/ text], [http://creativecommons.org/audio/ audio], [http://creativecommons.org/image/ images], [http://creativecommons.org/video/ video] and [http://creativecommons.org/education/ educational works]. It's by no means a comprehensive catalog of everything being done with Creative Commons licenses today, nor is it the beginnings of a database. They are simply illustrations of some works, in a variety of media, that have been Creative Commons licensed so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Will works that use Creative Commons licenses be in the &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, because the licensor does not give up all rights to his or her work. The Creative Commons licenses are only copyright licenses that enable you to control how other people use your work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to put your work in the public domain -- the realm of creative material unfettered by copyright law – you can use our [http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain Public Domain Dedication]. By dedicating your work to the public domain, you are effectively relinquishing all copyright interests you may otherwise have in the work. However, this waiver may not be valid outside of the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What is Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structurally, Creative Commons is a Massachusetts, US, US charitable corporation . Also working to promote the idea of Creative Commons are volunteer project leads in each of the jurisdictions to which Creative Commons licenses have been ported. Creative Commons International and the volunteer [http://creativecommons.org/worldwide/ project leads] are independent and separate entities although both work in collaboration to promote the adoption of Creative Commons licenses and tools.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea underlying Creative Commons is that some people may not want to exercise all of the intellectual property rights the law affords them. We believe there is an unmet demand for an easy yet reliable way to tell the world “Some rights reserved” or even “No rights reserved.” Many people have long since concluded that all-out copyright doesn't help them gain the exposure and widespread distribution they want. Many entrepreneurs and artists have come to prefer relying on innovative business models rather than full-fledged copyright to secure a return on their creative investment. Still others get fulfillment from contributing to and participating in an intellectual commons. For whatever reasons, it is clear that many citizens of the Internet want to share their work -- and the power to reuse, modify, and distribute their work -- with others on generous terms. Creative Commons intends to help people express this preference for sharing by offering the world a set of licenses on our Website, at no charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who started Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberlaw and intellectual property experts James Boyle, Michael Carroll, and Lawrence Lessig, MIT computer science professor Hal Abelson, lawyer-turned-documentary filmmaker-turned-cyberlaw expert Eric Saltzman, and public domain Web publisher Eric Eldred founded Creative Commons in 2001. Fellows and students at the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society at Harvard Law School helped get the project off the ground and, for the first couple of years of its existence, Creative Commons was housed at and received generous support from Stanford Law School and the Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What problem does Creative Commons intend to solve?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the advent of the digital revolution and the Internet, it is suddenly possible to distribute works in a variety of formats of a high, often professional quality; to work collaboratively across contexts; and to create new, derivative or collective works—on a global level, in a decentralised manner, and at comparatively low cost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This presents an opportunity for an enormous and unprecedented stimulation of creativity and production of knowledge. As more and more people are interconnected and communicating, it becomes easier to obtain exactly the content one needs or want and to complete tasks and solve problems by the cooperation this interconnection enables. The convergence of technologies and media also create multiple new possibilities for creating derivatives of existing works -- for example, remixes and mashups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another notable aspect is that globalization is not only happening on the corporate level, its effects can also be observed in the areas of science and education and in other sectors of society where new models of fruitful cooperation have appeared. The free encyclopedia Wikipedia and the free and open source software community are examples of these sociological and economic phenomena. The activities of many contributors to projects in these areas are not motivated by the desire to gain (immediate) financial benefit but by the desire to learn, to get recognition, and also to help others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside of these exciting new developments and possibilities is that the new technologies can also be used to violate the rights of copyright owners as they are currently defined. In turn, major right holders have reacted to this by a fourfold strategy: (a) by trying to prevent the deployment of technologies that can be put to infringing uses; (b) by developing tools that enable them to manage their rights with an amount of precision hitherto unknown and unthinkable: digital rights management and technological protection measures against unauthorised copying; (c) by successfully lobbying for support of these technological measures through legal restrictions; and, (d) by starting huge publicity campaigns designed to teach young people that they must keep their hands off copyrighted material - or else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These responses are understandable, if regrettable. Our concern is that their combined effect will be to stifle the opportunities for digital technologies to be used widely to encourage creativity and for the problem-solving and collaboration discussed above. If creators and licensors have to negotiate not only complicated legal rules, but also burdensome technical barriers, many will either ignore the rules or not create.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our alternative is to provide creators and licensors with a simple way to say what freedoms they want their creative work to carry. This in turn makes it easy to share, or build upon creative work. It makes it possible for creators and licensors to reserve some rights while releasing others. This, at its core, is our mission. Copyright gives authors certain rights. We want to make it simpler for authors to exercise those rights in ways others can understand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does it cost me anything to use the Creative Commons licenses &amp;amp; tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope. They're free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Who funds Creative Commons?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons was built with and is sustained by the generous support of organizations including the Center for the Public Domain, Omidyar Network, The Rockefeller Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as well as members of the public. We continue to seek donations from other sources, including foundations, individuals, and government grants. If you would like to support Creative Commons, feel free to do so at our [http://support.creativecommons.org support page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Whom does Creative Commons serve or represent?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons serves creators and users of creative works and the public interest that benefits from greater collaboration using creative materials. We help people who want to license their work on generous terms, people who want to make creative uses of those works, and people who benefit from this symbiosis. We hope that teachers, scholars, scientists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers, Web hobbyists -- as well as listeners, readers, and viewers -- gain from the use of our tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Where is Creative Commons based?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creative Commons Corporation is a Massachusetts corporation that draws on the work of geographically distributed staff and volunteers. Our main offices are in San Francisco and Boston in the United States and Berlin in Germany. See our [http://creativecommons.org/contact contact page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Does Creative Commons host or own any content?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our primary mission is to help you license your work, offer you tools to more easily publish your works, and point to examples of CC-licensed content from our featured works. We also offer ways for users to find licensed works and easily understand their license terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do, however, also host content on its [http://ccmixter.org ccMixter site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Is Creative Commons involved in digital rights management (DRM)?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. We are in the business of digital rights expression, not management. Our tools make it easy to say what rights an author is reserving. But we do not provide tools for enforcing the rights the author reserves. Digital rights management (or “DRM”) does. In addition to digitally expressing rights, a DRM system provides technology for enforcing those rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why don’t we use technology to enforce rights? There are too many reasons to describe here. Perhaps the most familiar is the fact that technology cannot protect freedoms such as “fair use.” Put differently, “fair use” can’t be coded. But more importantly, we believe, technological enforcement burdens unplanned creative reuse of creative work. We want to encourage such use. And we, along with many others, are concerned that the ecology for creativity will be stifled by the pervasive use of technology to “manage” rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copyrights should be respected, no doubt. But we prefer they be respected the old fashioned way — by people acting to respect the freedoms, and limits, chosen by the author and enforced by the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from &amp;quot;impos(ing) any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encryption or an access limitation is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the Work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the Work by the recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation is not incompatible with the prohibition on DRM because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution). If, however, encryption is implemented in such as way as to prevent the recipient from exercising any right granted by the license, then that would constitute a violation of this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====I love what Creative Commons does. How can I help?====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would be very grateful for your help. You are welcome to support Creative Commons Corporation by [http://support.creativecommons.org making a donation at our Support page]. In exchange for your donation, you'll receive a variety of items, depending on level. Donations and shipping addresses are handled by Paypal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also give us feedback directly at info@creativecommons.org. Alternately, you can participate in our [http://creativecommons.org/discuss email discussion lists].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FAQ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18321</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18321"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T00:10:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: /* Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community that uses:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18320</id>
		<title>CC0 Development Process</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=CC0_Development_Process&amp;diff=18320"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T00:08:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Rowe: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback and summaries of the [[CC0]] community feedback process will be posted here.  This is not a complete list of all feedback, just a summary.  We have provided links to specific comments whenever possible.  If we missed your comment or concern you are invited to add to this discussion.  Comments can be made on this page, the [[Talk:CC0_Feedback|discussion page]] or on related lists noted below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Status =&lt;br /&gt;
CC0 is in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2], and we are actively soliciting public comment on the latest draft.  More general information and resources on CC0 can be found [[CC0|here]].  This will also be a topic of discussion at the [[CCi Legal Day 2008]]  At that time, we plan to engage collaboratively with our CCi project leads and others from the broader CC community in an effort to address to the extent possible the feedback collected as of that date.  To make that collaboration as meaningful as possible, we ask that further feedback be submitted in advance of the iSummit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feedback on the deed and legal code should be directed to the cc-licenses mailing list. To join go to [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses cc-license list].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General comments may be posted on the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community cc-community list here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Deed and Legal Code Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received a number of comments in response to the original draft of [then]-CCZero, most of which we have endeavored to capture below in the interest of completeness but which are now largely moot due to revisions made in [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8211 Beta Draft 2].  We have noted those instances below whenever possible.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Scope of Rights being Waived ==&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments sought clarification on the scope of the waiver:  does it just waive copyright-specific rights, or is it broader and includes rights such as patents[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html], trademarks, unfair competition, privacy rights, publicity rights, commercial rights, and/or database rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These issues were clarified in Beta 2, though trademarks were not addressed and patent rights were only addressed in the context of facts and ideas.  We plan to add language to make clear that patent and trademark rights, if any, held by the affirmer are not affected by the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also suggested that we make clear that the waiver does not affect third party rights related to the content, such as publicity and privacy rights.  While this is always the case (none of our legal tools purport to affect third party rights), we agree it bears mentioning in the text of the waiver itself.  We plan to submit for discussion proposed language to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
There is some concern in the community that a renouncement of rights cannot be made without a signature.  We continue to look at this issue, but it does appear to be solvable in some jurisdictions by inclusion of the alternative license language.  This issue is being considered further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the waiver require a signature in order to be effective or enforceable? [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006301.html] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006304.html notes on relevance of signature]&lt;br /&gt;
*How might a signature be obtained: via emails; a la CC's current PDD process; other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Restrictions and Limitations on Waiving Moral Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several CCi project leads and community members have commented on the restrictions and limitations on waiving moral rights, particularly in European jursidictions, such as&lt;br /&gt;
* German Moral rights are unalienable [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006352.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Under Australian law, you can consent to specific instances of infringement of your moral rights, but you cannot waive them. s195AW(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 states that it is not an infringement of moral rights if the infringement is within the scope of '''written consent''' given by the author. [http://ccelliott.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-cc0.html Comment from  Elliott Bledsoe] &lt;br /&gt;
* Norway - moral rights issue [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006348.html comment from Gisle](law cite needed) &lt;br /&gt;
* UK may require a signature for waiving moral right 87 (2)&amp;quot; Any of those rights may be waived by instrument in writing signed by the person giving up the right.&amp;quot; Suggesting that 87(4) may provide some wiggle room but unsure how well it would work with regards to moral rights. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006350.html]&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment suggesting that moral rights and the conversation from CC v3.01 is relevant [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3.01#what_is_CC.27s_moral_rights_policy.3F]&lt;br /&gt;
* A suggestion that the only possible solution under monistic systems with strong moral rights would probably be an assertion to never claim and enforce any unwaivable right in the work, although further suggesting that courts won't be readily willing to uphold such an auxilliary construction designed to circumvene non-dispositive law. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-April/006351.html cc-license list John Hendrik Weitzmann]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction-Specific Comments (not otherwise captured) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some CCi jurisdictions foresee problems with renouncing unrenuncible rights and have noted where the legal code may conflict with or contradict applicable law.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chile = copyright act - art. 86 ...all the patrimonial rights as unrenunciable by authors [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006317.html]  Waivers may solve this issue... can't renounce but can waive. There are possibly conflicting statutes in some Latin American countries on this issue  [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006319.html] &lt;br /&gt;
* Spain = similar issues in Spain as Chile: PD = waived rights and some rights can not be waived. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006318.html David on the cc-licenses list]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 works to solve this problem by providing a renouncement, a waiver, and a license if the renouncement and the waiver fail in a particular jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Tool / Usability  Feedback =&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary goals of CC0 is to provide a tool that is easy to use and understand.  CC has received several suggestions for improving the tool, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warning is needed, or some way to let people know what rights they need to make this dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The issue of informing people as to the rights they need to apply a CC License or Waiver has come up in several contexts.  This issue is not unique to CC0 and is being considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The meta data needs to express more information (early comment): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note:  The current metadata states &amp;quot;all copyright, moral rights, database rights, and any other rights that might be asserted over X&amp;quot;, and will likely be updated as we finalize the legal code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be useful you need to explain why you think something is PD. [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-February/006332.html Geni from cc-license]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CC Note: this may be more applicable to the public domain assertion tool but could be useful in the CC0 context also .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Readable Deed ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several commentators have suggested that the deed include a more specific listing of rights waived and what is meant by the &amp;quot;neighboring rights&amp;quot; referenced in the legal code.  Currently, the deed uses the language &amp;quot;The person who has associated a work with this document affirms that he or she holds the copyright interests in the work, and hereby waives all of those interests and any related or neighboring legal rights in the work.&amp;quot;  We may update this language once the legal code is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= FAQs needed =&lt;br /&gt;
As with all CC tools specific questions tend to reoccur.  Here is a list of current FAQs for CC0 and some of the answers suggested by community members (not yet reviewed by CC):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC keeping track of PD stuff?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is CC0 about branding?  No&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it a waiver or a license? It is first a waiver (akin to a quit claim deed or an abandonment of rights), and then alternatively a license if the waiver is not enforceable in a particular jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
*What is the difference between CC0 and the existing public domain dedication?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Using 'CC0' clearly marks the difference between a work _actually_ being in the public domain, something that varies by jurisdiction and that the creator can't fully control (or so we think), to a work being _effectively_ in the public domain (to the extent possible under applicable law), which the creator _can_ control.&amp;quot; [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006299.html Evan]&lt;br /&gt;
#Universal instead of US-centric&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key difference from a legal standpoint is that the current CC PD dedication covers only copyright and that CC0 waiver covers other rights as well (and not just database rights).&amp;quot;[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006303.html Jordan on cc-Licenses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What makes CC0 Active?  Publication of the work with the CC0 Waiver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be working to reword these informal FAQ's to be more user friendly and expand the topics covered for the official release of CC0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other PD Waiver/License Resources and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
CC is not the first to create a public domain waiver.  Below is a list of other Public domain resources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODC Public Domain Dedication and License is a similar license and should be considered in the process.   [http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/ copy of the license] [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2008-January/006285.html comment from Jordan Hatcher] [http://www.opencontentlawyer.com/2008/01/16/dissecting-cczero/ other included comment here]  only deals with copyright and DB rights&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags#Public_domain Public domain definitions for commons.wikimedia.org] States the nature of why a work may be in the PD&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Self wikipedia PD-Self]  Very simple declaration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta 2 was influenced by the prior works in this area, and was specifically expanded to incorporate language directed at Databases (See paragraph 4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Name of tool:&lt;br /&gt;
Community that uses:&lt;br /&gt;
Notes:&lt;br /&gt;
Text:&lt;br /&gt;
URL:&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Rowe</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>