Creative Commons - User contributions [en]

UK: Scotland

2013-06-27T10:32:32Z

Andrés:

{{Jurisdiction
|jurstatus=Active
|status=2.5
|country code=scotland
|homepage=http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/
|social=https://twitter.com/#!/CCUnitedKingdom
|otherurl=email [mailto:info@creativecommons.org.uk CCUK]
|region=Europe
|affiliated=SCRIPT Centre for Research in IP and Technology
|affurl=http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/
|afftype=academic institution
|plead1=Jonathan Mitchell
|plead2=Professor Hector MacQueen
|plead3=Andres Guadamuz
|pemail3=a.guadamuz@ed.ac.uk
|flagurl=http://creativecommons.org/images/international/scotland.png
}}
Visit the [http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/ jurisdiction's website].
The Creative Commons UK: Scotland license suite is available in the following version. [http://creativecommons.org/choose/?jurisdiction=scotland License your work] under these licenses, or [http://creativecommons.org/choose choose] the international licenses. [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ#Should_I_choose_an_international_license_or_a_ported_license.3F More info].

Many thanks to all who contributed to the localization of the license suite.

Creative Commons is working with [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/ SCRIPT Centre for Research in IP and Technology], at Edinburgh University to create UK: Scotland jurisdiction-specific licenses from the generic Creative Commons licenses.

=CC UK Scotland List=

Project Lead: [http://www.jonathanmitchell.info/ Jonathan Mitchell QC], [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/people/view.asp?ref=8 Professor Hector MacQueen], and [mailto:anduin13@hotmail.com Andres Guadamuz]

*[http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/international/scotland/translated-license.pdf License draft].
*[mailto:cc-uk-at-lists.ibiblio.org Post a message].
*[http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk Subscribe to the discussion] (joint mailing list with CC-England and Wales).
*[http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-uk/ Read the discussion archives].

=More about the SCRIPT Centre for Research in IP and Technology=

[http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/ SCRIPT Centre for Research in IP and Technology] was established at the University of Edinburgh in 1998 as a centre of excellence in the disciplines of intellectual property law (IP) and information technology law (IT). Initially the purpose was to bring together and provide a coherent focus for work that was on-going at the University of Edinburgh, in particular within the School of Law, from which were drawn the four founding co-directors (Edwards, Laurie, McQueen and Waelde). The Directors found that studying and teaching IP and IT law, and medical jurisprudence and ethics, not in isolation but as inter-related phenomena, and not just in their legal but also their social, ethical, cultural and commercial context, generated innovative cross-cutting research of the highest quality. As a result, SCRIPT emerged as a pioneer centre in the UK. It was on the basis of the successes of SCRIPT that AHRC funding was secured in 2002.

Its research is about the synergetic relationship between law, technologies, commerce and society in the widest possible sense. As well as IT and IP, we and our associates are concerned with the adjunct areas of biotechnology, genetics and medical jurisprudence and ethics; law and artificial intelligence, including the distribution of legal knowledge via the Web; regulation of electronic commerce, the Internet, media, and the information society; it also consider law as it affects information management and cultural production and archiving.

Networks, Complexity and Internet Regulation: Scale-Free Law

2012-06-14T15:10:27Z

Andrés:

{{Books
|author=Andres Guadamuz
|genre=NonFiction
|publisher=Edward Elgar
|isbn=1848443102
|pubdate=2011
|license=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode
|cclicensed=
|pvfp=http://www.amazon.com/Networks-Complexity-Internet-Regulation-Scale-Free/dp/1848443102
|nbpages=272
}}

Networks, Complexity and Internet Regulation introduces network theory to legal audiences and applies some of the characteristics of large distributed self-organizing networks to the topic of Internet regulation.

Networks, Complexity and Internet Regulation: Scale-Free Law

2012-06-14T15:05:00Z

Andrés: etworks, Complexity and Internet Regulation introduces network theory to legal audiences and applies some of the characteristics of large distributed self-organizing networks to the topic of Internet

Networks, Complexity and Internet Regulation introduces network theory to legal audiences and applies some of the characteristics of large distributed self-organizing networks to the topic of Internet regulation.

Costa Rica

2012-05-03T23:55:42Z

Andrés:

{{Jurisdiction
|jurstatus=Active
|status=3.0
|country code=cr
|mailing list=http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-costa-rica
|twitter=http://ccostarica.wordpress.com/
|social=https://www.facebook.com/creativecommonscostarica
|region=Latin America
|affiliated=University of Costa Rica
|affurl=http://www.ucr.ac.cr/
|afftype=academic institution
|plead1=Carlos E. Saborío Romero
|pemail1=hola@zavorio.com
|plead2=Meilyn Garro
|pemail2=meilyn.garro@ucr.ac.cr
|plead3=Denis Campos
|pemail3=denis.campos@ucr.ac.cr
|plead4=Adriana Sanchez
|pemail4=adris@sulabatsu.com
|plead5=Andres Guadamuz
|pemail5=anduril13@gmail.com
|flagurl=http://creativecommons.org/images/international/cr.png
}}
Costa Rica has as its affiliate institution the [http://www.ucr.ac.cr/administracion/componentes-sustantivos/investigacion.html University of Costa Rica] through the area of research (Vicerrectoría de Investigación). There is also a vibrant voluntary sector, which includes Creative Commons enthusiasts from the artistic and music communities.

Costa Rica

2011-10-21T11:32:35Z

Andrés:

{{Jurisdiction
|jurstatus=Active
|status=3.0
|country code=cr
|mailing list=http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-costa-rica
|region=Latin America
|affiliated=University of Costa Rica
|affurl=http://www.ucr.ac.cr/
|afftype=academic institution
|plead1=Carlos E. Saborío Romero
|pemail1=hola@zavorio.com
|plead2=Meilyn Garro
|pemail2=meilyn.garro@ucr.ac.cr
|plead3=Denis Campos
|pemail3=denis.campos@ucr.ac.cr
|plead4=Adriana Sanchez
|pemail4=adris@sulabatsu.com
|plead5=Andres Guadamuz
|pemail5=anduril13@gmail.com
|flagurl=http://creativecommons.org/images/international/cr.png
}}

Costa Rica has as its affiliate institution the [http://www.ucr.ac.cr/administracion/componentes-sustantivos/investigacion.html University of Costa Rica] through the area of research (Vicerrectoría de Investigación). There is also a vibrant voluntary sector, which includes Creative Commons enthusiasts from the artistic and music communities.

Costa Rica

2011-10-21T11:24:13Z

Andrés:

Scholarship and critique regarding Creative Commons

2011-10-17T14:42:42Z

Andrés: /* 2005 */

These articles and comments have been collected to represent the different views about Creative Commons and issues related to Creative Commons. If you know of an article or comment that is not represented here, please add it, or suggest on the talk page. Articles and comments that are suitable for inclusion here are those which somehow progress and contribute to the debate that surrounds CC & CC-related issues.

==General Articles and Comments Related to CC and CC Related Topics==

===2011===

*Botero, Carolina & Cerda, Alberto. Creative Commons en América Latina: Una perspectiva comparada, in e-colabora “Revista de ciencia, educación, innovación y cultura apoyadas por Redes de Tecnología Avanzada”, Colombia, vol. 1, n. 2, 2011, pp. 1 – 15. [http://publicaciones.renata.edu.co/index.php/RCEC/article/download/43/pdf link]

*Bouchard, Paul. Las promesas de la red y sus implicaciones. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, RUSC, Vol. 8, n. 1, 2011, pp. 272-287. [http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v8n1-bouchard/v8n1-bouchard link]

*Fewer, David. Analysis of Share-Alike Obligations in Municipal Open Data Licenses. Canada: CIPPIC, 2011. [http://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/CIPPIC%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Share-alike%20Obligations.pdf]

*Hietanen, Athukorala, Salovaara, What’s with the Free Images? A Study of Flickr’s Creative Commons Attribution Images, Mind Trek 2011.

===2010===

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Creative Commons Licenses Legal Pitfalls: Incompatibilities and Solutions. Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law/Creative Commons Nederland, 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/101220cc_incompatibilityfinal.pdf link]

*Paul Keller (Creative Commons Nederland) & Andy Zondervan (Buma/Stemra). Evaluation of the Creative Commons Buma/Stemra pilot. Amsterdam/Hoofddorp, Augustus 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/100824evaluation_pilot_en.pdf link]

*José Manuel Ruiz Gutiérrez, Crowdfunding y Creative Commons: Nuevos Modelos de Financiación y Propiedad Intelectual para la Producción y Distribución de Proyectos Audiovisuales. CDC Cuadernos de Comunicación, ISSN 1988-3153, Nº. 4, 2010, págs. 30-38. [http://cdc.escogranada.com/cdc/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/0404cc.pdf link]

===2009===

*Christina Angelopoulos. Creative Commons and Related Rights in Sound Recordings: Are the Two Systems Compatible? Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht, 2009. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/091201cc_sound_recordings.pdf link]

*Herkko Hietanen. Wikimedia Licensing Policy Change – A Conundrum, WIPO magazine November 2009 [http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2009/06/article_0004.html link]

===2008===

* Abelson Hal, Adida Ben, Linksvayer Mike, Yergler Nathan, ccREL: The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language, Communia First Workshop, Torino, January 2008. [http://www.communia-project.eu/node/79 link]

*Dobusch Leonhard, Quack Sigrid, “Epistemic Communities and Social Movements: Transnational Dynamics in the Case of Creative Commons,” MPIfG (Max-Planck Institute for the Study of Societies), Discussion Paper 08/8. [http://www.mpifg.de/pu/dp_abstracts/dp08-8.asp link]

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Check Your Data Freedom: Defining a Taxonomy for Access and Reuse of Life Science Data. Nature Precedings, July 2008. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2083.1 link]

===2007===

*M.M.M. van Eechoud & B. van der Wal, “Creative commons licensing for public sector information: Opportunities and pitfalls“, Institute for Information Law, 2007. [http://www.ivir.nl/publications/eechoud/CC_PublicSectorInformation_report_v3.pdf link]

* Mary Wai San Wong, ‘User-Generated Content & the Open Source/Creative Common Movements: Has the Time Come for Users' Rights?’ (2007) [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1022395 Link]

===2006===

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Creative Commons: licencias de contenido abierto para regular trabajos creativos, in Revista de la Asociación de Técnicos de Informática, n. 181, 2006, pp. 28-30. [http://www.ati.es/novatica/2006/181/181-28.pdf link]

*Creative Commons Submission in response to the Questions for online consultation released in conjunction with the i2010 Digital Libraries Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions [SEC(2005) 1195]. [http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/consultation/replies/consult_results/cc_a302994.pdf link]

*Digital Rights Management: Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Internet Group [http://www.apig.org.uk/current-activities/apig-inquiry-into-digital-rights-management/DRMreport.pdf link]

*M. Klang. Informational Commons: On creativity, copyright & licenses, Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Göteborg.

*Hietanen Herkko, Dulong de Rosnay Melanie, « Legal Metadata for Semantic Web Applications: Case Creative Commons », Symposium on Digital Semantic Content across Cultures, Paris, the Louvre, May 2006. [http://www.seco.tkk.fi/events/2006/2006-05-04-websemantique/presentations/articles/hietanen-DulongdeRosnay-Legal-Metadata-for-Semantic-Web-Applications.pdf link]

*Remix World: towards a global digital commons [http://www.opendemocracy.net/arts-commons/issue.jsp link]

*A. Rens, Managing Risk and Opportunity in Creative Commons Enterprises, First Monday, volume 11, number 6 (June 2006) [http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_6/rens/index.html link]

*Wikipedia Entry on Creative Commons [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_commons link]

* Kimberlee G. Weatherall, ‘Would you ''ever'' recommend a Creative Commons license?’(2006) Australasian Intellectual Property Resources [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/AIPLRes/2006/4.html Link]

===2005===

* Barker Ed, Duncan Charles, Guadamuz Andres, Hatcher Jordan, Waelde Charlotte, The Common Information Environment and Creative Commons. Final Report to the Common Information Environment Members of a study on the applicability of Creative Commons Licences, 10 October 2005, [http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/content/download/632/2631/file/CIE_CC_Final_Report.pdf Link]

*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Two: The intellectual property system and freedom of expression and creativity. [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_two_the_intellectual_property#comment50 link]

*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Three: The public domain and open access models of information creation: at odds with the intellectual property system or enabled by it? [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_three_the_public_domain#comment53 link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit, in Hugenholtz P. Bernt & Guibault Lucie (eds.), The Future of the Public Domain, Kluwer Law International, 2006. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]

*Mia Garlick, Creative Humbug? Bah the humbug, let’s get creative! By:Mia Garlick, Creative Commons, [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-print_article.php?articleId=124. link]

*Mia Garlick, A Review of Creative Commons and Science Commons , [http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id=666&ID=ERM05510&bhcp=1. link]

*Andrea Glorioso, gravi (o presunti tali) problemi delle CC, ("The severe (or so believed) problems of CC [licenses]") [http://punto-informatico.it/p.aspx?id=1275360 link]

*H. Hietanen & V. Oksanen, (2005) Legal metadata, open content distribution and collecting societies. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/legal_metadata_open_content.pdf link]

*M. Klang (2005). The Digital Commons: Using Licenses to Promote Creativity, Proceedings of Ethicomp. [http://www.ituniv.se/~klang/web/pub/Klangethicomp.pdf link]

*Mako-Hill Benjamin, Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement, july 2005. [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]

===2004===

*Christiane Asschenfeldt, "Copyright and Licensing Issues—The International Commons." In CERN Workshop Series on Innovations in Scholarly Communication: Implementing the Benefits of OAI (OAI3), 12 February-14 February 2004 at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: CERN, 2004. [http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00000998/ link]

*Brian Fitzgerald, Brian, and Ian Oi, "Free Culture: Cultivating the Creative Commons." (2004). [http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00000122/ link]

*N. Hendriks, (2004) Developing CC Licenses for Dutch Creatives. In Danièle Bourcier and Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay, editors, International Commons at the Digital Age, La création en partage, pages 19-32. Romillat, Paris, 2004. [http://fr.creativecommons.org/iCommonsAtTheDigitalAge.pdf link]

*M. Pawlo, (2004) What is the Meaning of Non-Commercial? in Bourcier D. & Dulong De Rosnay, M. (eds).

*M. Välimäki, M. and H. Hietanen. (2004). The Challenges of Creative Commons Licensing, Computer Law Review, (06):172-177, Dec 2004. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/cri06-04_A_Vaelimaeki_Hietanen.pdf link]

*Jonathan B. Weitzman, and Lawrence Lessig. "Open Access and Creative Common Sense." Open Access Now, 10 May 2004. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/archive/?page=features&issue=16 link]

===2003===

*"Out of the Way: How the Next Copyright Revolution Can Help the Next Scientific Revolution." PLoS Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 30-31. [http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0000009 link]

*Lawrence Lessig, The Creative Commons, RBL, Tokyo (2003). (No online link available at this time).

*Barbara F. Schloman,"Creative Commons: An Opportunity to Extend the Public Domain." Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13 October 2003. [http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/infocol/info_12.htm link]

*Gary Stix, "Some Rights Reserved." Scientific American 288, no. 3 (2003): 46. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=7&articleID=000C2691-4F88-1E40-89E0809EC588EEDF link]

===2002===

*D.C. Denison, "For Creators, An Argument for Alienable Rights." Boston Globe, 22 December 2002, E2. (No online link available at this time).

*Hal Plotkin, "All Hail Creative Commons: Stanford Professor and Author Lawrence Lessig Plans a Legal Insurrection." SFGate.com, 11 February 2002. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/02/11/creatcom.DTL link]

==Books Related to CC and CC Related Topics==

===2010===

* Danièle Bourcier, Pompeu Casanovas, Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Catharina Maracke (editors), (2010). Intelligent Multimedia. Sharing Creative Works in a Digital World, European Press Academic Publishing, Florence, June 2010, 412 p. ISBN: 9788883980633. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CCiBook_printedversion_IntelligentMultimedia1.pdf link to pdf] - [http://www.e-p-a-p.com/publications/bookcard.php?isbn=9788883980633 link to table of contents]

===2008===
*Herkko Hietanen, The Pursuit of Efficient Copyright Licensing—How Some Rights Reserved Attempts to Solve the Problems of All Rights Reserved, PhD. Dissertation, 2008. [http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/42778/isbn9789522147219.pdf?sequence=2 Pdf-link]

===2006===

*Yochai Benkler, (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300110561. [http://www.benkler.org/wealth_of_networks/index.php/Download_PDFs_of_the_book. link]

===2005===
*Eric von Hippel, (2005). Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0262002744. [http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ.htm link]

*Lawrence Lessig, (2005). Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. New York: Penguin. ISBN 9780143034650. [http://www.free-culture.cc/freeculture.pdf link]

*Kembrew McLeod, (2005). Freedom of Expression (R) : Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0385513259. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]

===2004===

*Danièle Bourcier, Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay (editors), (2004). International Commons at the Digital Age/La création en partage. Paris: Editions Romillat. ISBN 2878940814. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/livre.pdf link to book pdf] - [http://creativecommons.fr/activite/httpccfr-dechelle-netactivitepublications/international-commons-at-the-digital-age/ link to table of contents] (NB. At the time this book was prepared, iCommons referred to the international licensing project currently known as Creative Commons International)

===2001===

*Lawrence Lessig, (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House. ISBN 0375505784.

*Kembrew McLeod, (2001). Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law (Popular Culture and Everyday Life). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. ISBN 0820451576. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]

===1999===

*Lawrence Lessig, (1999). Code, and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 046503912X.

===1997===

*James Boyle (1997). Shamans, Software, and SpleensL Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674805232.

==Law Journal Articles about CC and CC Related Topics==

===2011===

* Herkko Hietanen, “Creative Commons Olympics. How Big Media is Learning to License From Amateur Authors” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-1-2011/2963 Link]

* Catherine Jasserand, “Creative Commons licences and design: Are the two compatible?” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-2-2011/3085 Link]

===2010===

* Catharina Maracke “Creative Commons International: The International License Porting Project” (2010) 1 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-1-2010/2417 Link]

* Juan Sebastián Sereno Restrepo, "Contenido generado por usuarios (ugc), wikies y derecho de autor". Revista la propiedad inmaterial, n. 14, 2010, págs. 209-260. [http://foros.uexternado.edu.co/ecoinstitucional/index.php/propin/article/viewFile/2480/2116 Link]

===2009===

*Chen Shun-ling, “To Surpass or to Conform – What are Public Licenses For?”, University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Issue 1, 2009, 107–139.

* Bas Bloemsaat & Pieter Kleve, ‘Creative Commons: A business model for products nobody wants to buy’ (2009) 23(3) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 237

===2008===

* Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer, "The New Servitudes" . Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028947

===2007===

*Michael Carroll, “Creative Commons as Conversational Copyright,” Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2007-8, in Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age, YU Peter K. (Ed.), Vol. 1, New York: Praeger, 2007, 445–61. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=978813 link]

* Jessica Coates, ‘Creative Commons - The Next Generation: Creative Commons licence use five years on’ (2007) 4 SCRIPT-ed (1) 72 [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol4-1/coates.asp Link]

*Hietanen Herkko, “A License or a Contract, Analyzing the Nature of Creative Commons Licenses,” NIR Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd (Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review), 2007/6, 76, 516–535. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1029366 link]

* Lydia Pallas Loren, "Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright" . George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 271, 2007 [http://ssrn.com/abstract=957939 link]

* Rafael Sánchez Aristi, Las licencias creative commons: un análisis crítico desde el derecho español. Revista jurídica de deporte y entretenimiento: deportes, juegos de azar, entretenimiento y música, n. 19, 2007, págs. 417-445. [http://www.aranzadi.es/index.php/informacion-juridica/doctrina/civil/las-licencias-creative-commons-un-analisis-critico-desde-el-derecho-espanol link]

===2006===

* Michael W. Carroll, ‘Creative Commons and the New Intermediaries’ (2006) 45 Michigan State Law Review [http://ssrn.com/abstract=782405 Link]

* Andrés Cuevas-Cardenas, Creative Commons: ¿Alternativa a la Propiedad Intelectual en Chile?, Alfa-Redi AR: Revista de Derecho Informático, n. 98, 2006

* Séverine Dusollier, The Master's Tools v. The Master's House: Creative Commons v. Copyright, Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, vol. 29, Spring 2006, p. 101.

* Andres Guadamuz Gonzalez, Open Science: Open Source Licenses in Scientific Research, 7 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 321(2006).

* Zachary Katz, Pitfalls of Open Licensing: An Analysis of Creative Commons Licensing, 46 IDEA 391 (2006).

* Raquel Xalabarder Plantada, "Las licencias Creative Commons: ¿una alternativa al copyright?". UOC Papers: revista sobre la sociedad del conocimiento, n. 2, 2006. [http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/2/dt/esp/xalabarder.pdf link]

===2005===

*Jerry Brito and Bridget Dooling, An Orphan Works Affirmative Defense to Copyright Infringement Actions, 12 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 75 (2005) [http://www.mttlr.org/voltwelve/brito&dooling.pdf link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitiating A Creative Commons, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 375 (November 2005).

*Lawrence B. Solum,Book Review : The Future of Copyright Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. By Lawrence Lessig, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1137 (2005).

*Matthew Dean Stratton, Will Lessig Succeed in Challenging the CTEA, Post-Eldred?, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 893 (Spring, 2005).

===2004===

*Anupam Chander and Sunder, Madhavi, The Romance of the Public Domain, 92 Calif. L. Rev. 1331 (2004).

*Lawrence Lessig, Commentary: The Creative Commons, 65 Mont. L. Rev. 1 (Winter, 2004).

*Lawrence Lessig, Free(ing) Culture for Remix, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 961 (2004).

*Robert P. Merges, A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 183 (Winter 2004).

*Christopher Sprigman, Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 485 (November, 2004).

===2003===

*Jeffrey L. Harrison, Creativity or Commons: A Comment on Professor Lessig, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 795 (2003).

*Lawrence Lessig, Dunwoody Distinguished Lecture in law: The Creative Commons, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2003).

==Criticisms of/Debate About Creative Commons & CC-related issues==

===2006===

*Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI), MEMORANDUM ON CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSES, [http://www.alai-usa.org/Memo%20Creative%20Com%20Licences%20jg%20rev%2022%20jan.doc link]

*Australian Copyright Council, Information Sheet: Creative Commons Licenses, May 2006. [http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets_pdf/g094.pdf/download link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, "Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit" . THE FUTURE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, P. Bernt Hugenholtz & Lucie Guibault, eds., Kluwer Law International, 2006 Available at SSRN: [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]

*Mihály Ficsor, "How Did We Arrive Here? The Evolution of Copyright Legislation (the End of?), [http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/B.1%20M.%20Ficsor_tcm6-43830.pdf link]

*Becky Hogge, "What Moves a Movement," [http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-commons/movement_3686.jsp link]

===2005===

*Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) position on CC, [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/forms_and_guidelines/creative_commons.asp link]

*D. M. Berry, & Giles Moss, “On the ‘Creative Commons’: a critique of the commons without commonalty,” Free Software Magazine. No. 5., [http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_05/commons_without_commonality link]

*D. M. Berry, & Giles Moss,"Libre Commons = Libre Culture + Radical Democracy. [http://www.noemalab.org/sections/ideas/ideas_articles/berry_moss_libre_commons.html link]

*Antonio Delgado, "Las 'Licencias Creative Commons'", documento OMPI-SGAE/DA/ASU/05/15, [http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/lac/es/ompi_sgae_da_asu_05/ompi_sgae_da_asu_05_15.pdf link]

*John C. Dvorak,“Creative Commons Humbug,” PC Magazine, [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1838251,00.asp link], Dvorak's revised position on CC: [http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/10/27/dvorak-recants-on-creative-commons-humbug/ link]

*Sarah Faulder, "What Creative Commons really means for writers," [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons_writers.pdf link]

*Michael Fitzgerald, "Copyleft Hits a Snag," [http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16073&ch=infotech link]

*Benjamin Mako Hill, "Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement," [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]

*Geert Lovink and Ned Rossiter, "Dawn of the Organised Networks," FibreCulture Journal Issue 5, [http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/lovink_rossiter.html link]

*Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA)'s Media Release: "AFC provides no Sanctuary for Australian performers," [http://modfilms.com/archives/doc/20050330_meaa_pressrelease.pdf link]

*Erik Möller, "The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License," [http://intelligentdesigns.net/Licenses/NC link]

*Raymond Nimmer, “Open source license proliferation, a broader view," [http://www.ipinfoblog.com/archives/licensing-law-issues-36-open-source-license-proliferation-a-broader-view.html link]

*Andrew Orlowski, “On Creativity, Computers and Copyright," The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/21/creativity/ link]

*Andrew Orlowski, "The Commons Just Isn't Creative," The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/29/creativity_computers_copyright_letters/ link]

*Emma Pike, "What you need to know about Creative Commons," [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons.pdf link]

*Emma Pike, "Let's be Clear about Creative Commons," Sound Nation. [http://www.bmr.org/html/news/news55.htm link]

*Evan Prodromou, "debian-legal Summary of Creative Commons 2.0 Licenses," [http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html link]

*Response of Australian Performing Rights Association (APRA) to Creative Commons International, Regarding the Application of APRA for Authorization, [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+64474.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+64474.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**Creative Commons International's First Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+61451.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+61451.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**Creative Commons Internationals' Second Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+70075.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+70075.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**filed as part of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission's consideration of the Australian Performing Rights Association's application for Authorisation of its input & output arrangements. All documents can be found here: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/744728/display/submission. link]

*Richard Stallman, Position on Creative Commons: [http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/entry-20050920.html here] and [http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/07/1733220 here]

*Péter Benjamin Tóth, “Creative Humbug: Personal feelings about the Creative Commons licenses," [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=118 link]

Scholarship and critique regarding Creative Commons

2011-10-17T14:34:13Z

Andrés: /* 2005 */

These articles and comments have been collected to represent the different views about Creative Commons and issues related to Creative Commons. If you know of an article or comment that is not represented here, please add it, or suggest on the talk page. Articles and comments that are suitable for inclusion here are those which somehow progress and contribute to the debate that surrounds CC & CC-related issues.

==General Articles and Comments Related to CC and CC Related Topics==

===2011===

*Botero, Carolina & Cerda, Alberto. Creative Commons en América Latina: Una perspectiva comparada, in e-colabora “Revista de ciencia, educación, innovación y cultura apoyadas por Redes de Tecnología Avanzada”, Colombia, vol. 1, n. 2, 2011, pp. 1 – 15. [http://publicaciones.renata.edu.co/index.php/RCEC/article/download/43/pdf link]

*Bouchard, Paul. Las promesas de la red y sus implicaciones. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, RUSC, Vol. 8, n. 1, 2011, pp. 272-287. [http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v8n1-bouchard/v8n1-bouchard link]

*Fewer, David. Analysis of Share-Alike Obligations in Municipal Open Data Licenses. Canada: CIPPIC, 2011. [http://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/CIPPIC%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Share-alike%20Obligations.pdf]

*Hietanen, Athukorala, Salovaara, What’s with the Free Images? A Study of Flickr’s Creative Commons Attribution Images, Mind Trek 2011.

===2010===

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Creative Commons Licenses Legal Pitfalls: Incompatibilities and Solutions. Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law/Creative Commons Nederland, 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/101220cc_incompatibilityfinal.pdf link]

*Paul Keller (Creative Commons Nederland) & Andy Zondervan (Buma/Stemra). Evaluation of the Creative Commons Buma/Stemra pilot. Amsterdam/Hoofddorp, Augustus 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/100824evaluation_pilot_en.pdf link]

*José Manuel Ruiz Gutiérrez, Crowdfunding y Creative Commons: Nuevos Modelos de Financiación y Propiedad Intelectual para la Producción y Distribución de Proyectos Audiovisuales. CDC Cuadernos de Comunicación, ISSN 1988-3153, Nº. 4, 2010, págs. 30-38. [http://cdc.escogranada.com/cdc/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/0404cc.pdf link]

===2009===

*Christina Angelopoulos. Creative Commons and Related Rights in Sound Recordings: Are the Two Systems Compatible? Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht, 2009. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/091201cc_sound_recordings.pdf link]

*Herkko Hietanen. Wikimedia Licensing Policy Change – A Conundrum, WIPO magazine November 2009 [http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2009/06/article_0004.html link]

===2008===

* Abelson Hal, Adida Ben, Linksvayer Mike, Yergler Nathan, ccREL: The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language, Communia First Workshop, Torino, January 2008. [http://www.communia-project.eu/node/79 link]

*Dobusch Leonhard, Quack Sigrid, “Epistemic Communities and Social Movements: Transnational Dynamics in the Case of Creative Commons,” MPIfG (Max-Planck Institute for the Study of Societies), Discussion Paper 08/8. [http://www.mpifg.de/pu/dp_abstracts/dp08-8.asp link]

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Check Your Data Freedom: Defining a Taxonomy for Access and Reuse of Life Science Data. Nature Precedings, July 2008. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2083.1 link]

===2007===

*M.M.M. van Eechoud & B. van der Wal, “Creative commons licensing for public sector information: Opportunities and pitfalls“, Institute for Information Law, 2007. [http://www.ivir.nl/publications/eechoud/CC_PublicSectorInformation_report_v3.pdf link]

* Mary Wai San Wong, ‘User-Generated Content & the Open Source/Creative Common Movements: Has the Time Come for Users' Rights?’ (2007) [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1022395 Link]

===2006===

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Creative Commons: licencias de contenido abierto para regular trabajos creativos, in Revista de la Asociación de Técnicos de Informática, n. 181, 2006, pp. 28-30. [http://www.ati.es/novatica/2006/181/181-28.pdf link]

*Creative Commons Submission in response to the Questions for online consultation released in conjunction with the i2010 Digital Libraries Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions [SEC(2005) 1195]. [http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/consultation/replies/consult_results/cc_a302994.pdf link]

*Digital Rights Management: Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Internet Group [http://www.apig.org.uk/current-activities/apig-inquiry-into-digital-rights-management/DRMreport.pdf link]

*M. Klang. Informational Commons: On creativity, copyright & licenses, Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Göteborg.

*Hietanen Herkko, Dulong de Rosnay Melanie, « Legal Metadata for Semantic Web Applications: Case Creative Commons », Symposium on Digital Semantic Content across Cultures, Paris, the Louvre, May 2006. [http://www.seco.tkk.fi/events/2006/2006-05-04-websemantique/presentations/articles/hietanen-DulongdeRosnay-Legal-Metadata-for-Semantic-Web-Applications.pdf link]

*Remix World: towards a global digital commons [http://www.opendemocracy.net/arts-commons/issue.jsp link]

*A. Rens, Managing Risk and Opportunity in Creative Commons Enterprises, First Monday, volume 11, number 6 (June 2006) [http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_6/rens/index.html link]

*Wikipedia Entry on Creative Commons [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_commons link]

* Kimberlee G. Weatherall, ‘Would you ''ever'' recommend a Creative Commons license?’(2006) Australasian Intellectual Property Resources [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/AIPLRes/2006/4.html Link]

===2005===

* Andrés Guadamuz et al. "Creative Commons Licensing Solutions for the Common Information Environment", Report by Intrallect and the AHRC Research Centre for Studies in IP and IT Law (2005) [http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/content/download/632/2631/file/CIE_CC_Final_Report.pdf Link]

*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Two: The intellectual property system and freedom of expression and creativity. [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_two_the_intellectual_property#comment50 link]

*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Three: The public domain and open access models of information creation: at odds with the intellectual property system or enabled by it? [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_three_the_public_domain#comment53 link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit, in Hugenholtz P. Bernt & Guibault Lucie (eds.), The Future of the Public Domain, Kluwer Law International, 2006. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]

*Mia Garlick, Creative Humbug? Bah the humbug, let’s get creative! By:Mia Garlick, Creative Commons, [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-print_article.php?articleId=124. link]

*Mia Garlick, A Review of Creative Commons and Science Commons , [http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id=666&ID=ERM05510&bhcp=1. link]

*Andrea Glorioso, gravi (o presunti tali) problemi delle CC, ("The severe (or so believed) problems of CC [licenses]") [http://punto-informatico.it/p.aspx?id=1275360 link]

*H. Hietanen & V. Oksanen, (2005) Legal metadata, open content distribution and collecting societies. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/legal_metadata_open_content.pdf link]

*M. Klang (2005). The Digital Commons: Using Licenses to Promote Creativity, Proceedings of Ethicomp. [http://www.ituniv.se/~klang/web/pub/Klangethicomp.pdf link]

*Mako-Hill Benjamin, Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement, july 2005. [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]

*Barker Ed, Duncan Charles, Guadamuz Andres, Hatcher Jordan, Waelde Charlotte, The Common Information Environment and Creative Commons. Final Report to the Common Information Environment Members of a study on the applicability of Creative Commons Licences, 10 October 2005, 39 p. [http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/knowledge_base/general_articles/creative_commons_licensing_solutions_for_the_common_information_environment__1 link]

===2004===

*Christiane Asschenfeldt, "Copyright and Licensing Issues—The International Commons." In CERN Workshop Series on Innovations in Scholarly Communication: Implementing the Benefits of OAI (OAI3), 12 February-14 February 2004 at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: CERN, 2004. [http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00000998/ link]

*Brian Fitzgerald, Brian, and Ian Oi, "Free Culture: Cultivating the Creative Commons." (2004). [http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00000122/ link]

*N. Hendriks, (2004) Developing CC Licenses for Dutch Creatives. In Danièle Bourcier and Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay, editors, International Commons at the Digital Age, La création en partage, pages 19-32. Romillat, Paris, 2004. [http://fr.creativecommons.org/iCommonsAtTheDigitalAge.pdf link]

*M. Pawlo, (2004) What is the Meaning of Non-Commercial? in Bourcier D. & Dulong De Rosnay, M. (eds).

*M. Välimäki, M. and H. Hietanen. (2004). The Challenges of Creative Commons Licensing, Computer Law Review, (06):172-177, Dec 2004. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/cri06-04_A_Vaelimaeki_Hietanen.pdf link]

*Jonathan B. Weitzman, and Lawrence Lessig. "Open Access and Creative Common Sense." Open Access Now, 10 May 2004. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/archive/?page=features&issue=16 link]

===2003===

*"Out of the Way: How the Next Copyright Revolution Can Help the Next Scientific Revolution." PLoS Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 30-31. [http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0000009 link]

*Lawrence Lessig, The Creative Commons, RBL, Tokyo (2003). (No online link available at this time).

*Barbara F. Schloman,"Creative Commons: An Opportunity to Extend the Public Domain." Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13 October 2003. [http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/infocol/info_12.htm link]

*Gary Stix, "Some Rights Reserved." Scientific American 288, no. 3 (2003): 46. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=7&articleID=000C2691-4F88-1E40-89E0809EC588EEDF link]

===2002===

*D.C. Denison, "For Creators, An Argument for Alienable Rights." Boston Globe, 22 December 2002, E2. (No online link available at this time).

*Hal Plotkin, "All Hail Creative Commons: Stanford Professor and Author Lawrence Lessig Plans a Legal Insurrection." SFGate.com, 11 February 2002. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/02/11/creatcom.DTL link]

==Books Related to CC and CC Related Topics==

===2010===

* Danièle Bourcier, Pompeu Casanovas, Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Catharina Maracke (editors), (2010). Intelligent Multimedia. Sharing Creative Works in a Digital World, European Press Academic Publishing, Florence, June 2010, 412 p. ISBN: 9788883980633. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CCiBook_printedversion_IntelligentMultimedia1.pdf link to pdf] - [http://www.e-p-a-p.com/publications/bookcard.php?isbn=9788883980633 link to table of contents]

===2008===
*Herkko Hietanen, The Pursuit of Efficient Copyright Licensing—How Some Rights Reserved Attempts to Solve the Problems of All Rights Reserved, PhD. Dissertation, 2008. [http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/42778/isbn9789522147219.pdf?sequence=2 Pdf-link]

===2006===

*Yochai Benkler, (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300110561. [http://www.benkler.org/wealth_of_networks/index.php/Download_PDFs_of_the_book. link]

===2005===
*Eric von Hippel, (2005). Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0262002744. [http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ.htm link]

*Lawrence Lessig, (2005). Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. New York: Penguin. ISBN 9780143034650. [http://www.free-culture.cc/freeculture.pdf link]

*Kembrew McLeod, (2005). Freedom of Expression (R) : Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0385513259. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]

===2004===

*Danièle Bourcier, Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay (editors), (2004). International Commons at the Digital Age/La création en partage. Paris: Editions Romillat. ISBN 2878940814. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/livre.pdf link to book pdf] - [http://creativecommons.fr/activite/httpccfr-dechelle-netactivitepublications/international-commons-at-the-digital-age/ link to table of contents] (NB. At the time this book was prepared, iCommons referred to the international licensing project currently known as Creative Commons International)

===2001===

*Lawrence Lessig, (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House. ISBN 0375505784.

*Kembrew McLeod, (2001). Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law (Popular Culture and Everyday Life). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. ISBN 0820451576. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]

===1999===

*Lawrence Lessig, (1999). Code, and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 046503912X.

===1997===

*James Boyle (1997). Shamans, Software, and SpleensL Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674805232.

==Law Journal Articles about CC and CC Related Topics==

===2011===

* Herkko Hietanen, “Creative Commons Olympics. How Big Media is Learning to License From Amateur Authors” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-1-2011/2963 Link]

* Catherine Jasserand, “Creative Commons licences and design: Are the two compatible?” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-2-2011/3085 Link]

===2010===

* Catharina Maracke “Creative Commons International: The International License Porting Project” (2010) 1 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-1-2010/2417 Link]

* Juan Sebastián Sereno Restrepo, "Contenido generado por usuarios (ugc), wikies y derecho de autor". Revista la propiedad inmaterial, n. 14, 2010, págs. 209-260. [http://foros.uexternado.edu.co/ecoinstitucional/index.php/propin/article/viewFile/2480/2116 Link]

===2009===

*Chen Shun-ling, “To Surpass or to Conform – What are Public Licenses For?”, University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Issue 1, 2009, 107–139.

* Bas Bloemsaat & Pieter Kleve, ‘Creative Commons: A business model for products nobody wants to buy’ (2009) 23(3) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 237

===2008===

* Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer, "The New Servitudes" . Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028947

===2007===

*Michael Carroll, “Creative Commons as Conversational Copyright,” Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2007-8, in Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age, YU Peter K. (Ed.), Vol. 1, New York: Praeger, 2007, 445–61. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=978813 link]

* Jessica Coates, ‘Creative Commons - The Next Generation: Creative Commons licence use five years on’ (2007) 4 SCRIPT-ed (1) 72 [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol4-1/coates.asp Link]

*Hietanen Herkko, “A License or a Contract, Analyzing the Nature of Creative Commons Licenses,” NIR Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd (Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review), 2007/6, 76, 516–535. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1029366 link]

* Lydia Pallas Loren, "Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright" . George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 271, 2007 [http://ssrn.com/abstract=957939 link]

* Rafael Sánchez Aristi, Las licencias creative commons: un análisis crítico desde el derecho español. Revista jurídica de deporte y entretenimiento: deportes, juegos de azar, entretenimiento y música, n. 19, 2007, págs. 417-445. [http://www.aranzadi.es/index.php/informacion-juridica/doctrina/civil/las-licencias-creative-commons-un-analisis-critico-desde-el-derecho-espanol link]

===2006===

* Michael W. Carroll, ‘Creative Commons and the New Intermediaries’ (2006) 45 Michigan State Law Review [http://ssrn.com/abstract=782405 Link]

* Andrés Cuevas-Cardenas, Creative Commons: ¿Alternativa a la Propiedad Intelectual en Chile?, Alfa-Redi AR: Revista de Derecho Informático, n. 98, 2006

* Séverine Dusollier, The Master's Tools v. The Master's House: Creative Commons v. Copyright, Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, vol. 29, Spring 2006, p. 101.

* Andres Guadamuz Gonzalez, Open Science: Open Source Licenses in Scientific Research, 7 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 321(2006).

* Zachary Katz, Pitfalls of Open Licensing: An Analysis of Creative Commons Licensing, 46 IDEA 391 (2006).

* Raquel Xalabarder Plantada, "Las licencias Creative Commons: ¿una alternativa al copyright?". UOC Papers: revista sobre la sociedad del conocimiento, n. 2, 2006. [http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/2/dt/esp/xalabarder.pdf link]

===2005===

*Jerry Brito and Bridget Dooling, An Orphan Works Affirmative Defense to Copyright Infringement Actions, 12 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 75 (2005) [http://www.mttlr.org/voltwelve/brito&dooling.pdf link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitiating A Creative Commons, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 375 (November 2005).

*Lawrence B. Solum,Book Review : The Future of Copyright Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. By Lawrence Lessig, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1137 (2005).

*Matthew Dean Stratton, Will Lessig Succeed in Challenging the CTEA, Post-Eldred?, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 893 (Spring, 2005).

===2004===

*Anupam Chander and Sunder, Madhavi, The Romance of the Public Domain, 92 Calif. L. Rev. 1331 (2004).

*Lawrence Lessig, Commentary: The Creative Commons, 65 Mont. L. Rev. 1 (Winter, 2004).

*Lawrence Lessig, Free(ing) Culture for Remix, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 961 (2004).

*Robert P. Merges, A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 183 (Winter 2004).

*Christopher Sprigman, Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 485 (November, 2004).

===2003===

*Jeffrey L. Harrison, Creativity or Commons: A Comment on Professor Lessig, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 795 (2003).

*Lawrence Lessig, Dunwoody Distinguished Lecture in law: The Creative Commons, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2003).

==Criticisms of/Debate About Creative Commons & CC-related issues==

===2006===

*Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI), MEMORANDUM ON CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSES, [http://www.alai-usa.org/Memo%20Creative%20Com%20Licences%20jg%20rev%2022%20jan.doc link]

*Australian Copyright Council, Information Sheet: Creative Commons Licenses, May 2006. [http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets_pdf/g094.pdf/download link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, "Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit" . THE FUTURE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, P. Bernt Hugenholtz & Lucie Guibault, eds., Kluwer Law International, 2006 Available at SSRN: [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]

*Mihály Ficsor, "How Did We Arrive Here? The Evolution of Copyright Legislation (the End of?), [http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/B.1%20M.%20Ficsor_tcm6-43830.pdf link]

*Becky Hogge, "What Moves a Movement," [http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-commons/movement_3686.jsp link]

===2005===

*Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) position on CC, [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/forms_and_guidelines/creative_commons.asp link]

*D. M. Berry, & Giles Moss, “On the ‘Creative Commons’: a critique of the commons without commonalty,” Free Software Magazine. No. 5., [http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_05/commons_without_commonality link]

*D. M. Berry, & Giles Moss,"Libre Commons = Libre Culture + Radical Democracy. [http://www.noemalab.org/sections/ideas/ideas_articles/berry_moss_libre_commons.html link]

*Antonio Delgado, "Las 'Licencias Creative Commons'", documento OMPI-SGAE/DA/ASU/05/15, [http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/lac/es/ompi_sgae_da_asu_05/ompi_sgae_da_asu_05_15.pdf link]

*John C. Dvorak,“Creative Commons Humbug,” PC Magazine, [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1838251,00.asp link], Dvorak's revised position on CC: [http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/10/27/dvorak-recants-on-creative-commons-humbug/ link]

*Sarah Faulder, "What Creative Commons really means for writers," [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons_writers.pdf link]

*Michael Fitzgerald, "Copyleft Hits a Snag," [http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16073&ch=infotech link]

*Benjamin Mako Hill, "Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement," [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]

*Geert Lovink and Ned Rossiter, "Dawn of the Organised Networks," FibreCulture Journal Issue 5, [http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/lovink_rossiter.html link]

*Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA)'s Media Release: "AFC provides no Sanctuary for Australian performers," [http://modfilms.com/archives/doc/20050330_meaa_pressrelease.pdf link]

*Erik Möller, "The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License," [http://intelligentdesigns.net/Licenses/NC link]

*Raymond Nimmer, “Open source license proliferation, a broader view," [http://www.ipinfoblog.com/archives/licensing-law-issues-36-open-source-license-proliferation-a-broader-view.html link]

*Andrew Orlowski, “On Creativity, Computers and Copyright," The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/21/creativity/ link]

*Andrew Orlowski, "The Commons Just Isn't Creative," The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/29/creativity_computers_copyright_letters/ link]

*Emma Pike, "What you need to know about Creative Commons," [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons.pdf link]

*Emma Pike, "Let's be Clear about Creative Commons," Sound Nation. [http://www.bmr.org/html/news/news55.htm link]

*Evan Prodromou, "debian-legal Summary of Creative Commons 2.0 Licenses," [http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html link]

*Response of Australian Performing Rights Association (APRA) to Creative Commons International, Regarding the Application of APRA for Authorization, [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+64474.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+64474.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**Creative Commons International's First Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+61451.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+61451.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**Creative Commons Internationals' Second Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+70075.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+70075.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**filed as part of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission's consideration of the Australian Performing Rights Association's application for Authorisation of its input & output arrangements. All documents can be found here: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/744728/display/submission. link]

*Richard Stallman, Position on Creative Commons: [http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/entry-20050920.html here] and [http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/07/1733220 here]

*Péter Benjamin Tóth, “Creative Humbug: Personal feelings about the Creative Commons licenses," [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=118 link]

Scholarship and critique regarding Creative Commons

2011-10-17T14:33:04Z

Andrés:

These articles and comments have been collected to represent the different views about Creative Commons and issues related to Creative Commons. If you know of an article or comment that is not represented here, please add it, or suggest on the talk page. Articles and comments that are suitable for inclusion here are those which somehow progress and contribute to the debate that surrounds CC & CC-related issues.

==General Articles and Comments Related to CC and CC Related Topics==

===2011===

*Botero, Carolina & Cerda, Alberto. Creative Commons en América Latina: Una perspectiva comparada, in e-colabora “Revista de ciencia, educación, innovación y cultura apoyadas por Redes de Tecnología Avanzada”, Colombia, vol. 1, n. 2, 2011, pp. 1 – 15. [http://publicaciones.renata.edu.co/index.php/RCEC/article/download/43/pdf link]

*Bouchard, Paul. Las promesas de la red y sus implicaciones. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, RUSC, Vol. 8, n. 1, 2011, pp. 272-287. [http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v8n1-bouchard/v8n1-bouchard link]

*Fewer, David. Analysis of Share-Alike Obligations in Municipal Open Data Licenses. Canada: CIPPIC, 2011. [http://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/CIPPIC%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Share-alike%20Obligations.pdf]

*Hietanen, Athukorala, Salovaara, What’s with the Free Images? A Study of Flickr’s Creative Commons Attribution Images, Mind Trek 2011.

===2010===

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Creative Commons Licenses Legal Pitfalls: Incompatibilities and Solutions. Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law/Creative Commons Nederland, 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/101220cc_incompatibilityfinal.pdf link]

*Paul Keller (Creative Commons Nederland) & Andy Zondervan (Buma/Stemra). Evaluation of the Creative Commons Buma/Stemra pilot. Amsterdam/Hoofddorp, Augustus 2010. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/100824evaluation_pilot_en.pdf link]

*José Manuel Ruiz Gutiérrez, Crowdfunding y Creative Commons: Nuevos Modelos de Financiación y Propiedad Intelectual para la Producción y Distribución de Proyectos Audiovisuales. CDC Cuadernos de Comunicación, ISSN 1988-3153, Nº. 4, 2010, págs. 30-38. [http://cdc.escogranada.com/cdc/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/0404cc.pdf link]

===2009===

*Christina Angelopoulos. Creative Commons and Related Rights in Sound Recordings: Are the Two Systems Compatible? Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht, 2009. [http://www.creativecommons.nl/downloads/091201cc_sound_recordings.pdf link]

*Herkko Hietanen. Wikimedia Licensing Policy Change – A Conundrum, WIPO magazine November 2009 [http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2009/06/article_0004.html link]

===2008===

* Abelson Hal, Adida Ben, Linksvayer Mike, Yergler Nathan, ccREL: The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language, Communia First Workshop, Torino, January 2008. [http://www.communia-project.eu/node/79 link]

*Dobusch Leonhard, Quack Sigrid, “Epistemic Communities and Social Movements: Transnational Dynamics in the Case of Creative Commons,” MPIfG (Max-Planck Institute for the Study of Societies), Discussion Paper 08/8. [http://www.mpifg.de/pu/dp_abstracts/dp08-8.asp link]

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. Check Your Data Freedom: Defining a Taxonomy for Access and Reuse of Life Science Data. Nature Precedings, July 2008. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2083.1 link]

===2007===

*M.M.M. van Eechoud & B. van der Wal, “Creative commons licensing for public sector information: Opportunities and pitfalls“, Institute for Information Law, 2007. [http://www.ivir.nl/publications/eechoud/CC_PublicSectorInformation_report_v3.pdf link]

* Mary Wai San Wong, ‘User-Generated Content & the Open Source/Creative Common Movements: Has the Time Come for Users' Rights?’ (2007) [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1022395 Link]

===2006===

*Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Creative Commons: licencias de contenido abierto para regular trabajos creativos, in Revista de la Asociación de Técnicos de Informática, n. 181, 2006, pp. 28-30. [http://www.ati.es/novatica/2006/181/181-28.pdf link]

*Creative Commons Submission in response to the Questions for online consultation released in conjunction with the i2010 Digital Libraries Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions [SEC(2005) 1195]. [http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/consultation/replies/consult_results/cc_a302994.pdf link]

*Digital Rights Management: Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Internet Group [http://www.apig.org.uk/current-activities/apig-inquiry-into-digital-rights-management/DRMreport.pdf link]

*M. Klang. Informational Commons: On creativity, copyright & licenses, Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Göteborg.

*Hietanen Herkko, Dulong de Rosnay Melanie, « Legal Metadata for Semantic Web Applications: Case Creative Commons », Symposium on Digital Semantic Content across Cultures, Paris, the Louvre, May 2006. [http://www.seco.tkk.fi/events/2006/2006-05-04-websemantique/presentations/articles/hietanen-DulongdeRosnay-Legal-Metadata-for-Semantic-Web-Applications.pdf link]

*Remix World: towards a global digital commons [http://www.opendemocracy.net/arts-commons/issue.jsp link]

*A. Rens, Managing Risk and Opportunity in Creative Commons Enterprises, First Monday, volume 11, number 6 (June 2006) [http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_6/rens/index.html link]

*Wikipedia Entry on Creative Commons [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_commons link]

* Kimberlee G. Weatherall, ‘Would you ''ever'' recommend a Creative Commons license?’(2006) Australasian Intellectual Property Resources [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/AIPLRes/2006/4.html Link]

===2005===

* Andrés Guadamuz et al. "Creative Commons Licensing Solutions for the Common Information Environment", Report by Intrallect and the AHRC Research Centre for Studies in IP and IT Law (2005) [http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/content/download/632/2631/file/CIE_CC_Final_Report.pdf Link]

*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Two: The intellectual property system and freedom of expression and creativity. [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_two_the_intellectual_property#comment50 link]

*Creative Commons comments as part of WIPO Online Forum on Intellectual Property and Information Society, Theme Three: The public domain and open access models of information creation: at odds with the intellectual property system or enabled by it? [http://www.wipo.int/roller/comments/ipisforum/Weblog/theme_three_the_public_domain#comment53 link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit, in Hugenholtz P. Bernt & Guibault Lucie (eds.), The Future of the Public Domain, Kluwer Law International, 2006. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]

*Mia Garlick, Creative Humbug? Bah the humbug, let’s get creative! By:Mia Garlick, Creative Commons, [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-print_article.php?articleId=124. link]

*Mia Garlick, A Review of Creative Commons and Science Commons , [http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id=666&ID=ERM05510&bhcp=1. link]

*Andrea Gloriosoi, gravi (o presunti tali) problemi delle CC, ("The severe (or so believed) problems of CC [licenses]") [http://punto-informatico.it/p.aspx?id=1275360 link]

*H. Hietanen & V. Oksanen, (2005) Legal metadata, open content distribution and collecting societies. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/legal_metadata_open_content.pdf link]

*M. Klang (2005). The Digital Commons: Using Licenses to Promote Creativity, Proceedings of Ethicomp. [http://www.ituniv.se/~klang/web/pub/Klangethicomp.pdf link]

*Mako-Hill Benjamin, Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement, july 2005. [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]

*Barker Ed, Duncan Charles, Guadamuz Andres, Hatcher Jordan, Waelde Charlotte, The Common Information Environment and Creative Commons. Final Report to the Common Information Environment Members of a study on the applicability of Creative Commons Licences, 10 October 2005, 39 p. [http://www.intrallect.com/index.php/intrallect/knowledge_base/general_articles/creative_commons_licensing_solutions_for_the_common_information_environment__1 link]

===2004===

*Christiane Asschenfeldt, "Copyright and Licensing Issues—The International Commons." In CERN Workshop Series on Innovations in Scholarly Communication: Implementing the Benefits of OAI (OAI3), 12 February-14 February 2004 at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: CERN, 2004. [http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00000998/ link]

*Brian Fitzgerald, Brian, and Ian Oi, "Free Culture: Cultivating the Creative Commons." (2004). [http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00000122/ link]

*N. Hendriks, (2004) Developing CC Licenses for Dutch Creatives. In Danièle Bourcier and Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay, editors, International Commons at the Digital Age, La création en partage, pages 19-32. Romillat, Paris, 2004. [http://fr.creativecommons.org/iCommonsAtTheDigitalAge.pdf link]

*M. Pawlo, (2004) What is the Meaning of Non-Commercial? in Bourcier D. & Dulong De Rosnay, M. (eds).

*M. Välimäki, M. and H. Hietanen. (2004). The Challenges of Creative Commons Licensing, Computer Law Review, (06):172-177, Dec 2004. [http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/docs/cri06-04_A_Vaelimaeki_Hietanen.pdf link]

*Jonathan B. Weitzman, and Lawrence Lessig. "Open Access and Creative Common Sense." Open Access Now, 10 May 2004. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/archive/?page=features&issue=16 link]

===2003===

*"Out of the Way: How the Next Copyright Revolution Can Help the Next Scientific Revolution." PLoS Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 30-31. [http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0000009 link]

*Lawrence Lessig, The Creative Commons, RBL, Tokyo (2003). (No online link available at this time).

*Barbara F. Schloman,"Creative Commons: An Opportunity to Extend the Public Domain." Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13 October 2003. [http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/infocol/info_12.htm link]

*Gary Stix, "Some Rights Reserved." Scientific American 288, no. 3 (2003): 46. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=7&articleID=000C2691-4F88-1E40-89E0809EC588EEDF link]

===2002===

*D.C. Denison, "For Creators, An Argument for Alienable Rights." Boston Globe, 22 December 2002, E2. (No online link available at this time).

*Hal Plotkin, "All Hail Creative Commons: Stanford Professor and Author Lawrence Lessig Plans a Legal Insurrection." SFGate.com, 11 February 2002. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/02/11/creatcom.DTL link]

==Books Related to CC and CC Related Topics==

===2010===

* Danièle Bourcier, Pompeu Casanovas, Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Catharina Maracke (editors), (2010). Intelligent Multimedia. Sharing Creative Works in a Digital World, European Press Academic Publishing, Florence, June 2010, 412 p. ISBN: 9788883980633. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CCiBook_printedversion_IntelligentMultimedia1.pdf link to pdf] - [http://www.e-p-a-p.com/publications/bookcard.php?isbn=9788883980633 link to table of contents]

===2008===
*Herkko Hietanen, The Pursuit of Efficient Copyright Licensing—How Some Rights Reserved Attempts to Solve the Problems of All Rights Reserved, PhD. Dissertation, 2008. [http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/42778/isbn9789522147219.pdf?sequence=2 Pdf-link]

===2006===

*Yochai Benkler, (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300110561. [http://www.benkler.org/wealth_of_networks/index.php/Download_PDFs_of_the_book. link]

===2005===
*Eric von Hippel, (2005). Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0262002744. [http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ.htm link]

*Lawrence Lessig, (2005). Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. New York: Penguin. ISBN 9780143034650. [http://www.free-culture.cc/freeculture.pdf link]

*Kembrew McLeod, (2005). Freedom of Expression (R) : Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0385513259. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]

===2004===

*Danièle Bourcier, Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay (editors), (2004). International Commons at the Digital Age/La création en partage. Paris: Editions Romillat. ISBN 2878940814. [http://creativecommons.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/livre.pdf link to book pdf] - [http://creativecommons.fr/activite/httpccfr-dechelle-netactivitepublications/international-commons-at-the-digital-age/ link to table of contents] (NB. At the time this book was prepared, iCommons referred to the international licensing project currently known as Creative Commons International)

===2001===

*Lawrence Lessig, (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House. ISBN 0375505784.

*Kembrew McLeod, (2001). Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law (Popular Culture and Everyday Life). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. ISBN 0820451576. [http://www.kembrew.com/books/ link]

===1999===

*Lawrence Lessig, (1999). Code, and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 046503912X.

===1997===

*James Boyle (1997). Shamans, Software, and SpleensL Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674805232.

==Law Journal Articles about CC and CC Related Topics==

===2011===

* Herkko Hietanen, “Creative Commons Olympics. How Big Media is Learning to License From Amateur Authors” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-1-2011/2963 Link]

* Catherine Jasserand, “Creative Commons licences and design: Are the two compatible?” (2011) 2 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-2-2011/3085 Link]

===2010===

* Catharina Maracke “Creative Commons International: The International License Porting Project” (2010) 1 Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law [http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-1-2010/2417 Link]

* Juan Sebastián Sereno Restrepo, "Contenido generado por usuarios (ugc), wikies y derecho de autor". Revista la propiedad inmaterial, n. 14, 2010, págs. 209-260. [http://foros.uexternado.edu.co/ecoinstitucional/index.php/propin/article/viewFile/2480/2116 Link]

===2009===

*Chen Shun-ling, “To Surpass or to Conform – What are Public Licenses For?”, University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Issue 1, 2009, 107–139.

* Bas Bloemsaat & Pieter Kleve, ‘Creative Commons: A business model for products nobody wants to buy’ (2009) 23(3) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 237

===2008===

* Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer, "The New Servitudes" . Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028947

===2007===

*Michael Carroll, “Creative Commons as Conversational Copyright,” Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2007-8, in Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age, YU Peter K. (Ed.), Vol. 1, New York: Praeger, 2007, 445–61. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=978813 link]

* Jessica Coates, ‘Creative Commons - The Next Generation: Creative Commons licence use five years on’ (2007) 4 SCRIPT-ed (1) 72 [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol4-1/coates.asp Link]

*Hietanen Herkko, “A License or a Contract, Analyzing the Nature of Creative Commons Licenses,” NIR Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd (Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review), 2007/6, 76, 516–535. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1029366 link]

* Lydia Pallas Loren, "Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright" . George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 271, 2007 [http://ssrn.com/abstract=957939 link]

* Rafael Sánchez Aristi, Las licencias creative commons: un análisis crítico desde el derecho español. Revista jurídica de deporte y entretenimiento: deportes, juegos de azar, entretenimiento y música, n. 19, 2007, págs. 417-445. [http://www.aranzadi.es/index.php/informacion-juridica/doctrina/civil/las-licencias-creative-commons-un-analisis-critico-desde-el-derecho-espanol link]

===2006===

* Michael W. Carroll, ‘Creative Commons and the New Intermediaries’ (2006) 45 Michigan State Law Review [http://ssrn.com/abstract=782405 Link]

* Andrés Cuevas-Cardenas, Creative Commons: ¿Alternativa a la Propiedad Intelectual en Chile?, Alfa-Redi AR: Revista de Derecho Informático, n. 98, 2006

* Séverine Dusollier, The Master's Tools v. The Master's House: Creative Commons v. Copyright, Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, vol. 29, Spring 2006, p. 101.

* Andres Guadamuz Gonzalez, Open Science: Open Source Licenses in Scientific Research, 7 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 321(2006).

* Zachary Katz, Pitfalls of Open Licensing: An Analysis of Creative Commons Licensing, 46 IDEA 391 (2006).

* Raquel Xalabarder Plantada, "Las licencias Creative Commons: ¿una alternativa al copyright?". UOC Papers: revista sobre la sociedad del conocimiento, n. 2, 2006. [http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/2/dt/esp/xalabarder.pdf link]

===2005===

*Jerry Brito and Bridget Dooling, An Orphan Works Affirmative Defense to Copyright Infringement Actions, 12 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 75 (2005) [http://www.mttlr.org/voltwelve/brito&dooling.pdf link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitiating A Creative Commons, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 375 (November 2005).

*Lawrence B. Solum,Book Review : The Future of Copyright Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. By Lawrence Lessig, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1137 (2005).

*Matthew Dean Stratton, Will Lessig Succeed in Challenging the CTEA, Post-Eldred?, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 893 (Spring, 2005).

===2004===

*Anupam Chander and Sunder, Madhavi, The Romance of the Public Domain, 92 Calif. L. Rev. 1331 (2004).

*Lawrence Lessig, Commentary: The Creative Commons, 65 Mont. L. Rev. 1 (Winter, 2004).

*Lawrence Lessig, Free(ing) Culture for Remix, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 961 (2004).

*Robert P. Merges, A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 183 (Winter 2004).

*Christopher Sprigman, Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 485 (November, 2004).

===2003===

*Jeffrey L. Harrison, Creativity or Commons: A Comment on Professor Lessig, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 795 (2003).

*Lawrence Lessig, Dunwoody Distinguished Lecture in law: The Creative Commons, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2003).

==Criticisms of/Debate About Creative Commons & CC-related issues==

===2006===

*Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI), MEMORANDUM ON CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSES, [http://www.alai-usa.org/Memo%20Creative%20Com%20Licences%20jg%20rev%2022%20jan.doc link]

*Australian Copyright Council, Information Sheet: Creative Commons Licenses, May 2006. [http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets_pdf/g094.pdf/download link]

*Niva Elkin-Koren, "Creative Commons: A Skeptical View of a Worthy Pursuit" . THE FUTURE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, P. Bernt Hugenholtz & Lucie Guibault, eds., Kluwer Law International, 2006 Available at SSRN: [http://ssrn.com/abstract=885466 link]

*Mihály Ficsor, "How Did We Arrive Here? The Evolution of Copyright Legislation (the End of?), [http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/B.1%20M.%20Ficsor_tcm6-43830.pdf link]

*Becky Hogge, "What Moves a Movement," [http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-commons/movement_3686.jsp link]

===2005===

*Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) position on CC, [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/forms_and_guidelines/creative_commons.asp link]

*D. M. Berry, & Giles Moss, “On the ‘Creative Commons’: a critique of the commons without commonalty,” Free Software Magazine. No. 5., [http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_05/commons_without_commonality link]

*D. M. Berry, & Giles Moss,"Libre Commons = Libre Culture + Radical Democracy. [http://www.noemalab.org/sections/ideas/ideas_articles/berry_moss_libre_commons.html link]

*Antonio Delgado, "Las 'Licencias Creative Commons'", documento OMPI-SGAE/DA/ASU/05/15, [http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/lac/es/ompi_sgae_da_asu_05/ompi_sgae_da_asu_05_15.pdf link]

*John C. Dvorak,“Creative Commons Humbug,” PC Magazine, [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1838251,00.asp link], Dvorak's revised position on CC: [http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/10/27/dvorak-recants-on-creative-commons-humbug/ link]

*Sarah Faulder, "What Creative Commons really means for writers," [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons_writers.pdf link]

*Michael Fitzgerald, "Copyleft Hits a Snag," [http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16073&ch=infotech link]

*Benjamin Mako Hill, "Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement," [http://mako.cc/writing/toward_a_standard_of_freedom.html link]

*Geert Lovink and Ned Rossiter, "Dawn of the Organised Networks," FibreCulture Journal Issue 5, [http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/lovink_rossiter.html link]

*Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA)'s Media Release: "AFC provides no Sanctuary for Australian performers," [http://modfilms.com/archives/doc/20050330_meaa_pressrelease.pdf link]

*Erik Möller, "The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License," [http://intelligentdesigns.net/Licenses/NC link]

*Raymond Nimmer, “Open source license proliferation, a broader view," [http://www.ipinfoblog.com/archives/licensing-law-issues-36-open-source-license-proliferation-a-broader-view.html link]

*Andrew Orlowski, “On Creativity, Computers and Copyright," The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/21/creativity/ link]

*Andrew Orlowski, "The Commons Just Isn't Creative," The Register. [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/29/creativity_computers_copyright_letters/ link]

*Emma Pike, "What you need to know about Creative Commons," [http://www.apra.com.au/writers/downloads/creative_commons.pdf link]

*Emma Pike, "Let's be Clear about Creative Commons," Sound Nation. [http://www.bmr.org/html/news/news55.htm link]

*Evan Prodromou, "debian-legal Summary of Creative Commons 2.0 Licenses," [http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html link]

*Response of Australian Performing Rights Association (APRA) to Creative Commons International, Regarding the Application of APRA for Authorization, [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+64474.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+64474.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**Creative Commons International's First Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+61451.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+61451.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**Creative Commons Internationals' Second Submission: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D05+70075.pdf&trimFileTitle=D05+70075.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=744729 link]
**filed as part of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission's consideration of the Australian Performing Rights Association's application for Authorisation of its input & output arrangements. All documents can be found here: [http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/744728/display/submission. link]

*Richard Stallman, Position on Creative Commons: [http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/entry-20050920.html here] and [http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/07/1733220 here]

*Péter Benjamin Tóth, “Creative Humbug: Personal feelings about the Creative Commons licenses," [http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=118 link]

Talk:Costa Rica/3.0/BY-NC-SA/Draft

2010-09-30T06:52:37Z

Andrés: /* Algunas Observaciones de Denis */

If you have comments about the licenses, whether in regards to legal, linguistic or usability issues, please feel welcome to use the this discussion page or the CC Costa Rican mailing list to share your thoughts. --[[User:Michelle Thorne|Michelle Thorne]] 14:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Si tiene cualquier comentario sobre las licencias, ya sea por un asunto legal, lingüístico o de usabilidad, no dude en utilizar esta página de discusión o la lista de correos de CC Costa Rica para compartir sus inquietudes. --[[User:Zavorio|Zavorio]] 19:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

----

Para escribir en esta página, es necesario crear una cuenta en el sitio. Una vez que se hace eso, abajo de este cuadro están los enlaces necesarios para editar --[[User:Carocr|Carocr]] 20:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

= Sugerencia 1: =

Si la definición de obra indica "cualquier producción en el campo literario, científico y artístico" debería corregirse cada vez que se menciona sólo artistica y literaria, para que incluya siempre "científica". No incluirlo nos complica las cosas a quienes tratamos de usar estas licencias en campos académicos.

La sugerencia aplicaría para:

"1. Definiciones

a. "Autor Original" significa, en el caso de una obra literaria o artística"...

"b. "Colección": es la Obra constituida por un conglomerado de obras literarias o artísticas"

"g. "Obra" significa el trabajo literario o artístico que se ofrece bajo los términos de esta Licencia, "

"h. "Obra Derivada" significa una obra basada en o sobre la Obra y otras obras preexistentes, tales como traducciones, adaptaciones, obras derivadas, arreglos musicales u otras alteraciones de una obra literaria, artística, musical, fonograma o ejecución."

'''Nota de [[User:Andrés|Andrés]]:''' Me parece una excelente sugerencia. Por el momento mantendremos el texto original como se encuentra, pero voy a crear una segunda versión con cambios sugeridos aquí para luego crear un nuevo borrador cuando tengamos suficientes sugerencias.

'''Nota de Denis''': La sugerencia también me parece buena la sugerencia para efectos de claridad, considerando que las licencias son diferentes a la ley nacional. La justificación, sin embargo, por la cual Andrés y yo omitimos la referencia expresa a lo científico y lo académico es porque en todo momento sustuvimos la compatibilidad de la licencia con el artículo 1 de la Ley de derechos de autor nacional la cual en lo que interesa establece que "...Por “''obras literarias y artísticas”, en adelante “obras”, deben entenderse todas las producciones en los campos literario, '''científico''' y artístico, cualquiera que sea la forma de expresión..."''

--> Entiendo, pero es suficiente con que se deje igual al artículo 1 una vez. Eso no excluye que se aclaren posteriormente. Es decir, a arrastrar una omisión que se cometió en la ley, no le veo el sentido. Claro, ustedes son los abogados, así que como decidan. --[[User:Carocr|Carocr]] 22:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

== '''Algunas Observaciones de Denis''' ==

Denis: Leyendo el borrador y con el propósito de ánimar la discusión señalo algunos aspectos de forma y fondo que he detectado:

En el punto '''4(b) iii''' en lo que interesa señala ''“una licencia de Creative Commons de otra jurisdicción (ya sea esta o una versión de licencia posterior) que contenga los mismo Elementos de Licencia” falta el plural de “mismos”.''

'''[[User:Andrés|Andrés]]:''' Arreglado.

Denis: En el '''4 (e) ii''' dice: ''"Sistemas de licencias obligatorias renunciables. En donde el derecho a cobrar regalías a través de cualquier sistema de licencias legales u obligatorias es renunciable, el Licenciante se reserva el derecho exclusivo a cobrar derechos de autor para cualquier ejercicio que Usted haga de los derechos concedidos bajo esta licencia si su ejercicio de tales derechos es para una finalidad o utilización no comercial autorizados en la Sección 4 (c). En cualquier otro uso comercial, el Licenciante renuncia al derecho a cobrar regalías a través de cualquier sistema de licencias legales u obligatorias."''

Me preguntaba si después del punto y aparte no falta un NO después del uso y antes del comercial. Es que me parece contradictorio (es posible que no esté entendiendo bien) porque es facultativo el cobro en usos no comerciales y se renuncia en los usos comerciales. No se si me explico. Mi lógica me dice que en usos comerciales, donde el usuario percibe dinero por mi obra yo si quiero podría cobrarle, en usos no comerciales renuncio a ese derecho en virtud de que el usuario precisamente tampoco los recibe. Como está redactado ahora es al revés. Si el uso es no comercial puede que le cobre como puede que no le cobre (es facultativo) pero si es comercial renuncio al cobro. No me parece lógico. Si la licencias legales u obligatorias es renunciable, tiene sentido que en ambos casos sea facultativo, o que renuncie en el caso de usos no comerciales, pero no que renuncie solamente en el caso de usos comerciales.

'''[[User:Andrés|Andrés]]:''' Estoy de acuerdo que el párrafo no es muy claro. He estado pensando en como redactar mejor esta sección para aclarar el punto, y y propongo lo siguiente:
''ii. Sistemas de licencias obligatorias renunciables. En donde el derecho a cobrar regalías a través de cualquier sistema de licencias estatutarias u obligatorias es renunciable, el Licenciante se reserva el derecho exclusivo a cobrar derechos de autor para cualquier ejercicio que Usted haga de los derechos concedidos bajo esta licencia si su ejercicio de tales derechos es para una finalidad o utilización diferente al uso no comercial autorizado en la Sección 4(c). En cualquier otro caso, el Licenciante renuncia al derecho a cobrar regalías a través de cualquier sistema de licencias estatutarias u obligatorias. ''

Denis: En el punto 5 las categorías de daño especial, incidental, consecuente, punitivo o ejemplar, no son consistentes con las categorías usualmente utilizadas en nuestro sistema jurídico. Tradicionalmente hablamos de responsabilidad contractual o extracontractual, según su origen, de responsabilidad por daños y perjuicios o por daño moral, según el tipo, esto sin ser exhaustivo. La categoría de daño especial tiene algún uso en el derecho administrativo cuando se habla del “sacrificio especial” cuando la responsabilidad se deriva del funcionamiento normal y la conducta licita de la Administración, pero en el ámbito privado su uso es infrecuente. Las categorías de daño incidental, consecuente, punitivo o ejemplar son bastante novedosas y tienen que ver hasta donde conozco más bien con garantías de transnacionales de mercancías tecnológicas y responsabilidad social de las empresas asociadas a temas de derechos de tercera generación (i.e. ambiente y paz). Sería bueno que Andrés que metió esos conceptos y que es experto en E-comerce y derecho comparado nos ilustrara con el tema y explicara el sentido de las expresiones en el texto y su función práctica en el ordenamiento costarricense.

'''[[User:Andrés|Andrés]]:''' Yo no "metí" los conceptos Denis, estos son conceptos de derecho internacional privado que se encuentran en la licencia original. Si no te parece la redacción actual, entonces podrías sugerir una alternativa.

([[Nota de Denis]]):No se trata tanto de una redacción alternativa como de cenceptos y términos compatibles con la legislación nacional y la búsqueda de aquellos que a la postre generen la menor cantidad de roces interpretativos. En ese sentido, debo señalar 1) que como operador de la materia de derechos de autor en una universidad son frecuentes las discusiones interpretativas y conozco alguna jurisprudencia nacional sobre el tema y la jerga de los jueces, no toda, pero sí alguna sobre la materia. Puedo decir que estas categorías son extrañas al derecho nacional costarricense 2) Sobre los señalamientos y observaciones específicas mi área fundamental de estudio y práctica es el derecho administrativo y público en general, empleo público, contratación administrativa, constitucional, etc… y en cuanto a daño especial sigo viéndolo como aquel que tiene como fundamento el rompimiento del equilibrio frente a las cargas públicas y que impone por tanto un deber indemnizatorio de la Adminsitración Pública o de cualquier manifestación del Estado ante daños y perjuicios ocasionados a un administrado que no tiene el deber de soportar. No conozco la categoría de daño especial en la doctrina del Derecho Internacional Privado y he buscado alguna referencia infructuosamente.

(== '''Denis''' ==) Ya tengo referencia sobre el '''daño especial''' y estoy más convencido de que debe ser remplazada la expresión, toda vez que su contenido y sentido no responde a la tradiciòn jurídica nacinal costarricense que como he señalado es propia del derecho administrativo. Recordemos que la idea de la Licencia CC es "adaptarla" a la legialación nacional. El concepto de "[[especial damage]]" según el [legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/special%20damages] es la compensación pecuniaria que se solicita por las lesiones que siguen a la lesión inicial que se ha compensado. Según se indica, la terminología y clasificación de los tipos de daños es muy variada y en ocasiones contradictorios, y a menudo confuso. El término "daño especial" es una de ellas y puede producir incertidumbre, dependiendo de la jurisdicción y el contexto en el que se invoca. Los daños especiales se pueden reclamar en los juicios tanto sobre la base de responsabilidad contractual como extracontractual. En ambos casos se clasifican como Daños Compensatorios y de la explicación que se expone se colige que no se trata de otra cosa que no que tratamos aquí como el lucro cesante, toda vez que los daños especiales se basan en cantidades medibles en unidades monetarias de una pérdida real, actual o futura, en contraposición a los daños generales se refieren a pérdidas intangibles que se pueden deducir de otros hechos que rodean el caso. En esta descripción daños especiales se reducen a una "cierta cantidad" antes del juicio. Esta descripción se suele utilizar en las acciones de responsabilidad civil. En el caso nacional la diferencia es que el lucro cesante dura o se calcula mientras duren las causas que impiden o general el perjuicio. De hecho de ahí l diferencia entre daños y perjuicios. El daños es el impacto o menoscabo sufrido inmediatamente, el perjuicio es el lucro cesante y me parece es lo que coincide en este caso con el “daño especial” anglosajón. De hecho en casos de responsabilidad contractual, parece confirmarse mi apreciación, porque las pérdidas que sale del contrato incumplido podrían ser compensadas por los daños y perjuicios especiales. Por ejemplo, la pérdida de beneficios resultantes de la falta del vendedor de entregar las mercancías pueden ser reclamados como indemnización especial. Una vez más típicos casos de lucro cesante. En otras palabras potencial riqueza dejada de percibir, que era razonablemente esperada con base cierta para ser reclamada y de la cual se ha privado por la acción o conducta ilegítima o al menos injustificada del agente responsable.

3)Para la expresión: [["incidental, consequential and punitive damages”]] que has traducido literalmente como [[“daño incidental, consecuente, punitivo”]] he encontrado como traducción al español propuesta por Carolina Lopez Garcia en proz.com la expresión [[“cualquier tipo de daños y perjuicios derivados del uso o mal funcionamiento (...)”. ]] Lo que me lleva a pensar que más que categorías específicas de daños o categorías dogmáticas son una expresión contractual o un formulismo con ese contenido semántico que bien podría traducirse de esa forma y me parece que tendría mayor claridad y sobre todo evitar problemas de interpretación y aplicación. 4)Con respecto al denominado daño ejemplar es también una interesante categoría que en nuestro sustema estaría contemplada de alguna manera en hipótesis de daño moral por compensar el sufrimiento según lo he entendido (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...mplary+damages (pincha aquí para ver definición [[?]]) y que en exemplary damage en UK y punitive damage en EEUU, no tan automático, ni tan cerrado, pero por ahí….(Nota el vinculo de la definición legal no está funcionando pero he incluido la misma definción en el "?" como vínculo interno.)

== '''Denis''' == Amplio y rectifico lo que señalé con anterioridad en el punto (3) sobre los [["incidental, consequential and punitive damages”]] =/≠ [[“daño incidental, consecuente, punitivo”]] y su aplicación en el derecho nacional costarricense. En primer lugar quiero rectificar un craso errror. Dije que pensaba que que categorías específicas de daños o categorías dogmáticas son una expresión contractual. Es un grave error y me disculpo. Sí son categorías docgáticas del derecho contractual y de la teoría de daños, pero pertencen al derecho anglosajón y eran desconocidas para mí. Lo cierto es que no tienen sentido en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico. Eso lo sostengo. '''A)''' El ''"incidental damage"'' responde a una categoría de daños y perjuicios que están razonablemente asociados o relacionados con daños actuales. Esta definiciòn no dice mucho verdad? Bueno, lo importante es que también esta categoría está regulada en la legislación comeracial de EEUU en el Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)— y se trata de los gastos comerciales en los que razonablemente un vendedor haya incurrido en la detención, entrega, transporte y cuidado de los bienes después del incumplimiento del comprador en contrato (Sec. 2-710) o los gastos del comprador razonablemente efectuados para ocuparse de las mercancías después de la vulneración de un vendedor de contrato (Sec. 2-715). Vistas estas definiciones y su origen normativo habría que ver que tan afortunado es su referencia expresa en la licencia nacional. No les encuentro sentido. '''B)''' El ''"consequential damage"'' es una categoría de responsabilidad contractual específica en la que puede incurrir el vendedor, por lo menos en la legislación norteamericana según el Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)— que es un Código que regula todas las transacciones comerciales de los EEUU salvo por algunos artículos no adoptados por el Estado de Louisiana. Tales daños deben incluir cualquier pérdida de requisitos generales o particulares y necesidades del comprador que el vendedor al momento de la contratación tenía motivos para saber y que no podía ser razonablemente evitado por una cubertura, la compra de bienes sustitutivos u otras alternativas. Esto es finalmente lo que en nuesto sistema se llama garantía de evicción y vicios redhibitorios. Se trata de una garantia implícita por vicios que puede tener la cosa objeto de adquisición. En otras palabras quien transmite una cosa por titulo oneroso esta obligado a garantizar el goce pleno, libre y pacífico del derecho que transmite y la integridad de la cosas transmitida. Así la garantía de evicción estña diseñada para defender al adquirente de la perturbación del derecho, mientras que la garantía por vicios redhibitorios no encuentra asiento jurídico en contiendas de derecho (sea que el litigio verse sobre el derecho a la cosa, o sobre un derecho sobre la cosa) sino en una situación netamente fáctica, la cual versa en la existencia de vicios ocultos, que cuando los mismos se manifiestan desvirtúan la finalidad de la cosa, o al menos la finalidad que el adquirente tuvo en miras al realizar la operación. De esa forma puede producirse, con motivo del afloramiento de estos vicios ocultos, la destrucción de la cosa, o tal vez, que la misma se torne inadecuada para su uso. '''C)''' Finalmente los ''punitive damages'' entiendo que son similares a los daños ejemplares que ya analice supra, pero la diferencia radica en la intensidad del daño o lesión (injurie) a reparar. Las más graves reciben compensasiones ejemplares que van más allá de lo simplemente punitivo, previstas, pedidas u otorgadas en casos muy similares cuando la conducta del acusado es especialmente dolosa, sin sentido, maliciosa, vengativa, u opresiva. Los daños punitivos no se les otorgan en concepto de indemnización, sino para castigar al infractor y de actuar como elemento disuasorio para otros que podrían participar en una conducta similar. Como se ve son bastante similares. para mi también entrarían como un tipo de daño moral en Costa Rica, pues aunqe no tengo noticia de semejante tipo de justificación condenatoria en nuestro sistema, el fin teolológico último, como señalaba arriba es de alguna manera compensar el sufrimiento excesivo e injustificado del damnificado. Todos estos conceptos en el free legal diccionary que he puesto de vínculo por ahí en varios puntos de la intervención, y alguna lectura adicional en algunos foros.

Como sea, me parece que estos puntos no son suficientemente claros en su redacción y podrían causar confusión. Además su origen foráneo los vuelve inadecuados para la jurisdicción nacional y extraños a nuestra tradición jurídica. Esto como he indicado es importante porque tendría problemas de aplicación e interpretación del instrumento. Por todo lo expuesto, si se trata de sugerir una redacción optaría por una fórmula simple como la propuesta por la autora española que he citado arriba y esto de [["incidental, consequential and punitive damages”]] lo cambiaría por la expresión [[“cualquier tipo de daños y perjuicios derivados del uso o mal funcionamiento (...)”. Si se quisiera hacer alusiòn expresa a los tipos de daños susceptibles de ser reclamados, creo que deberíamos dar la discusión de cuáles sería teoricamente los posibles de solicitar a la luz de la experiencia judicial y de las categorías de responsabilidad usuales en el derecho costarricense.

No se que opinan????

--> Yo no soy abogada pero he traducido diversos asuntos con respecto a copyright y derechos de autor. Considero que en efecto, se trata de traducciones literales de expresiones, por lo tanto, es mejor buscar alguna redacción general que sea comprensible. Cualquier cosa que suena a "eso no existe en Costa Rica" afectará la adopción de las licencias.

¡Muchas gracias Denis y Andrés! --[[User:Carocr|Carocr]] 22:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

'''[[User:Andrés|Andrés]]:''' Gracias Caro, Denis no ofreció una variante al párrafo, así que he decidido usar un lenguaje más genérico. Propongo que esta sección se lea así:

"Creative Commons Corporation no es una parte de esta Licencia no ofrece garantías acerca de la Obra. En la máxima medida permitida por la legislación aplicable, no será responsable ante Usted ni ante terceros por cualquier daño originado en conexión con esta Licencia."

Talk:Costa Rica/3.0/BY-NC-SA/Draft

2010-09-03T08:21:56Z

Andrés:

User:Andrés

2010-08-07T09:43:53Z

Andrés: Created page with 'Andrés Guadamuz [http://www.technollama.co.uk/ Blog] [http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/staff/andresguadamuz/ University Page]'

Andrés Guadamuz

[http://www.technollama.co.uk/ Blog]

[http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/staff/andresguadamuz/ University Page]

Talk:Costa Rica/3.0/BY-NC-SA/Draft

2010-08-07T09:39:52Z

Andrés: /* Sugerencia 1: */

Talk:Costa Rica/3.0/BY-NC-SA/Draft

2010-08-07T09:39:22Z

Andrés: /* Sugerencia 1: */

Talk:Costa Rica/3.0/BY-NC-SA/Draft

2010-08-07T09:37:16Z

Andrés: /* Sugerencia 1: */