Please note: An account is needed only to edit the CC Wiki. If you need an account, please email webmaster at creativecommons org and we'll make you an account.
Sita Sings the Blues is a musical, animated personal interpretation of the Indian epic the Ramayana released under a CC Attribution-Share Alike license.
"I want my film to reach the widest audience. It costs money to run a theater; it costs money to manufacture DVDs; it costs money to make and distribute 35mm film prints. It’s essential I allow people to make money distributing Sita these ways and others; otherwise, no one will do it. So I eschewed the “non commercial” license. Share Alike would “protect” the work from ever being locked up [...] a Share Alike license eliminates the corporate abuse everyone’s so afraid of, while it encourages entrepreneurship and innovation. Everyone wins, especially the artist!" — Nina Paley

Overview

Sita Sings the Blues is an animated feature-length film from Nina Paley. It has achieved wide levels of success, both commercially and in press, without the help of traditional press methods or large studio backing. Released under a CC Attribution-Share Alike license, the film is a prime example of 'open-source cinema'.

You can read more about the film at the .

License Usage

Sita Sings The Blues is released under a [CC Attribution-Share Alike license], a decision Paley came to after her experience trying to license Annette Hanshaw's music. Sita Sings The Blues FAQ

Motivations

Paley describes her motivation for using a CC BY-SA license at length in her featured interview at creativecommons.org:


I want my film to reach the widest audience. It costs money to run a theater; it costs money to manufacture DVDs; it costs money to make and distribute 35mm film prints. It’s essential I allow people to make money distributing Sita these ways and others; otherwise, no one will do it. So I eschewed the “non commercial” license. Share Alike would “protect” the work from ever being locked up. It’s better than Public Domain; works are routinely removed from the Public Domain via privatized derivatives (just try making your own Pinocchio). I didn’t want some corporation locking up a play or TV show based on Sita. They are certainly welcome to make derivative works, and make money from them; in fact I encourage this. But they may not sue or punish anyone for sharing those works.

I looked to the Free Software movement as a model. The CC BY-SA license most closely resembles the GNU GPL, which is the foundation of Free Software. People make plenty of money in Free Software; there’s no reason they can’t do the same in Free Culture, except for those pernicious “non commercial” licenses. A Share Alike license eliminates the corporate abuse everyone’s so afraid of, while it encourages entrepreneurship and innovation. Everyone wins, especially the artist!

Profit Breakdown

via The Wall Street Journal:

  • Total donations from people who appreciate her giving out free content: $23,000
  • Profits from her online store which sells merchandise and DVDs: $19,000
  • Theatrical distribution revenues: $3,000 (out of total box office tally of $22,350)
  • Additional DVD distribution: $3,000
  • Broadcast television distribution: $3,000
  • Revenue from Central Cinema in Seattle which showed the film: $4,000
  • Grand total: $55,000
  • About CC Wiki
  • This page was last modified on 25 October 2012, at 12:03.